obviously you can't defend every one of trump's actions - Crash
Which at this point can only be summed up as assumptions and assertions based ostensibly forwarded by a single news source. How can anyone defend a hogdge podge of this, that or other. No one can but the detail sent to investigate and to sort it out. Remember, WikiLeaks had already done Clumsy's job. All he had to do was proofread for accuracy. And when he found the fact, was clueless as how to handle a political football. The Democrates were the first to recognize this and but that was before they recognized he could. Flip. Flop.
Here, we've no evidence. No evidence under sworn testimony. Eventually we may get to it by surprise disclosures of secret tapes during the Nixon Watergate hearing. Or instead a wet spot will literally be dropped in our laps as was done during the Clinton impeachment. Or may lacking substance, it will not.
So go ahead and let the social medial be your guide, liberals. No on is going to defend all the wild machinations you can come up with, not even your own special prosecutor, even if there was such a thing, would even attempt to do so. Well, maybe Timothy Leary back in the day.
Congratulations, you've outsmarted yourselves. You come up with stuff you can proof, and I will be waiting at the finish line where only the proof of the truth prevails and smacks you right between the running lights.
Worse case scenario for me, like Clinton, Trump is impeached and finishes out his second term.
Best case, Trump is not impeached, Sessions indicts the Clintons, Trump completes his second term, and all liberals go live in sanctuary cities where by popular vote to elect another loser.
In the mean time, its jobs, jobs, jobs for the American blue collar worker.