Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Crash.Override posted:

members of the house committee investigating trump and his campaign staff for colluding with the russians now say 'evidence is more than circumstantial.'

republican reply.. it's obama's fault.

 

Probably another load of donkey dung like another item that was supposed to get Trump impeached:

Trump's Washington hotel poses no conflict of interest, agency finds

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-a...flict-194844750.html

I might add that some sources of wire tapped James Rosen state that the use of incidental surveillance of the Trump transition team was improper:

Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News. The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretappedhim in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.

The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.

The key to that conclusion is the unmasking of selected U.S. persons whose names appeared in the intelligence, the sources said, adding that the paper trail leaves no other plausible purpose for the unmasking other than to damage the incoming Trump administration.

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...eam-source-says.html

Trump lies 14 times in interview.... OBAMA!!!

Trump ties to Russia now deemed more than circumstantial.... OBAMA!!!

Trumpcare will price elderly citizens out of the market ..... OBAMA!!!!

Trumpcare may make coverage for essential things like hospitalization, prescriptions, mental health, pregnancy all optional for insurance providers .... OBAMA!!!!

Trumpcare gives a large tax break only to super wealthy investors..... OBAMA!!!!!

Trump misunderstands the way treaties work.... OBAMA!!!

Trump has taken 6 vacations already and already amassed well over 10 million in vacation fees in right at two months.... OBAMA!!!

Trump lawyers send cease & desist letter and threaten legal action to teenage girl whom started a website where a kitty kat scratches Trumps face... OBAMA!!!!

Exactly what are the Russians supposed to have done to support the Trump campaign?  The DNC and RNC were hacked in 2015.  The FBI warned both. The RNC installed anti-hacking software.  The DNC didn't. Hacking started in earnest on DNC servers in April 2016 -- servers still unprotected.  John Podesta fell for a phishing ploy to expose his email password (PASSWORD).  Trump was considered a dark horse until late in the campaign. Even as the Republican candidate, polls showed him as trailing Hillary.  Why would the Russians support such as dark horse? And, exactly what did they do to support him?   

The Russians are masters of disruption and have been since the days of the czar.  Whatever interference they've done was to sow chaos in the US body politic They're doing so in the Ukraine, now.  Recently, their presence was found in a number of EU nations.  Democrats are serving their traditional role as useful idiots assisting the Russians in their campaign of disruption.

This is also coming from the party whom in recent polling almost half said they had a "favorable" impression of Putin.  This shows you how little informed they truly are.   A murderous dictator whom literally has opposition murdered and runs a police state with little freedom and deplorable living conditions, yet they view him favorably.   Amazing!  


OBAMA!!!!

Last edited by MonkeysUncleByMarriage
direstraits posted:

Exactly what are the Russians supposed to have done to support the Trump campaign?  The DNC and RNC were hacked in 2015.  The FBI warned both. The RNC installed anti-hacking software.  The DNC didn't. Hacking started in earnest on DNC servers in April 2016 -- servers still unprotected.  John Podesta fell for a phishing ploy to expose his email password (PASSWORD).  Trump was considered a dark horse until late in the campaign. Even as the Republican candidate, polls showed him as trailing Hillary.  Why would the Russians support such as dark horse? And, exactly what did they do to support him?   

The Russians are masters of disruption and have been since the days of the czar.  Whatever interference they've done was to sow chaos in the US body politic They're doing so in the Ukraine, now.  Recently, their presence was found in a number of EU nations.  Democrats are serving their traditional role as useful idiots assisting the Russians in their campaign of disruption.

The old saying is, where there is smoke, there is fire.   If there seems to be an inappropriate relationship, then it should be investigated.   I don't deny your claims about hacking and how the DNC was careless about their security.   And only the DNC can be held liable for that.  The Trump situation isn't about hacking, it's about willful collusion.   

And it is quite obvious why the Russians would want Trump to win.  He is obviously very easily manipulated, driven insane by television shows, unsure of how treaties work, given to praising Putin, and easily duped by fake news stories that he then in turn tweets out to his mindless subjects.    

OBAMA!!!!

Last edited by MonkeysUncleByMarriage

How can one tell of a Democrat is loose with the truth -- mouth moving, heart beating, breathing.  Unfortunately, brain activity is not a good tell, as its nil, most times.

Conservatives have contrasted Putin, who admitted is the soul of evil, who also attempts to strengthen his weak ramshackle nation, with Obama with his apology tours, deep bows, and general bad mouthing of the US.

 

MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:

This is also coming from the party whom in recent polling almost half said they had a "favorable" impression of Putin.  This shows you how little informed they truly are.   A murderous dictator whom literally has opposition murdered and runs a police state with little freedom and deplorable living conditions, yet they view him favorably.   Amazing!  


OBAMA!!!!

Putin is the murderous dictator the hypocritical left didn't mind Hellery Clinton selling 20% of our Uranium reserves for Bubba's speaking fees and foundation gifts. Putin is also the guy whose hackers had free access to the servers of the US along with the Chinese without the present histrionics until Clinton lost. Putin is also the guy who made Obama look like a wuss.

Putin is also a guy with a large nuclear arsenal and a failing economy because oil prices tanked. If stoopid Trump can scare the other NATO members into investing in their militaries even if his language is imprecise, he can prevent Putin from using the invasion economic stimulus. 

Last edited by Stanky
Stanky posted:
MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:

This is also coming from the party whom in recent polling almost half said they had a "favorable" impression of Putin.  This shows you how little informed they truly are.   A murderous dictator whom literally has opposition murdered and runs a police state with little freedom and deplorable living conditions, yet they view him favorably.   Amazing!  


OBAMA!!!!

Putin is the murderous dictator the hypocritical left didn't mind Hellery Clinton selling 20% of our Uranium reserves for Bubba's speaking fees and foundation gifts. Putin is also the guy whose hackers had free access to the servers of the US along with the Chinese without the present histrionics until Clinton lost. Putin is also the guy who made Obama look like a wuss.

Putin is also a guy with a large nuclear arsenal and a failing economy because oil prices tanked. If stoopid Trump can scare the other NATO members into investing in their militaries even if his language is imprecise, he can prevent Putin from using the invasion economic stimulus. 

Stanky posted:
MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:

This is also coming from the party whom in recent polling almost half said they had a "favorable" impression of Putin.  This shows you how little informed they truly are.   A murderous dictator whom literally has opposition murdered and runs a police state with little freedom and deplorable living conditions, yet they view him favorably.   Amazing!  


OBAMA!!!!

Putin is the murderous dictator the hypocritical left didn't mind Hellery Clinton selling 20% of our Uranium reserves for Bubba's speaking fees and foundation gifts. Putin is also the guy whose hackers had free access to the servers of the US along with the Chinese without the present histrionics until Clinton lost. Putin is also the guy who made Obama look like a wuss.

Putin is also a guy with a large nuclear arsenal and a failing economy because oil prices tanked. If stoopid Trump can scare the other NATO members into investing in their militaries even if his language is imprecise, he can prevent Putin from using the invasion economic stimulus. 

1. ) Again continuing with another false narrative put forward by the Trump campaign (as I said, he shovels it in, they eat it up.)    Clinton simply did not sell 20% of the uranium to Russia.  There is simply no factual basis for yet another salacious Trump Idiocracy claim.

No, Hillary Clinton did not "give Russia 20 percent of the uranium” in the US

http://www.vox.com/world/2017/...inton-russia-uranium

 

"Trump is referring to Russia’s nuclear power agency purchasing a majority stake in a Toronto-based energy company between 2009 and 2013. The company had mines and land in a number of US states with huge uranium production capacity — a move the USState Department signed off on. But PolitiFact did a thorough fact-check of the claim last year when Trump first made it on the campaign trail, and found the following faults with it:

  1. The mines, mills, and land the company holds in the US account for 20 percent of the US’s uranium production capacity, not actual produced uranium.
  2. The State Department was one of nine federal agencies and a number of additional independent federal and state regulators that signed off on the deal.
  3. President Obama, not Secretary Clinton, was the only person who could’ve vetoed the deal.
  4. Since Russia doesn’t have the legal right to export uranium out of the US, its main goal was likely to gain access to the company’s uranium assets in Kazakhstan.
  5. Crucially, the main national security concern was not about nuclear weapons proliferation, as Trump suggests, but actually ensuring the US doesn’t have to depend too much on uranium sources from abroad, as the US only makes about 20 percent of the uranium it needs. An advantage in making nuclear weapons wasn’t the main issue because, as PolitiFact notes, “the United States and Russia had for years cooperated on that front, with Russia sending enriched fuel from decommissioned warheads to be used in American nuclear power plants in return for raw uranium.”

 

Republicans never let facts or research get in the way of a good argument.

 

2.) Russian hackers were an issue well before Clinton lost.   In fact, Trump and Clinton both spoke on it numerous times during the campaign and well before the election. But I am sure you are referring to the Commander-In-Tweets ignorant tweet of "Unless you catch "hackers" in the act, it is very hard to determine who was doing the hacking. Why wasn't this brought up before election?" on December 12th."   As I have stated MANY times, Trump tweets recklessly and his mindless subjects eat it up as fact.

13 Times Russian Hacking Came up in the Presidential Campaign 

http://www.npr.org/2016/12/12/...residential-campaign

 

3.) Trump isn't going to "scare" anyone into using their money properly.   We (The US) have been in an ongoing effort to get the other countries to increase their spending to the agreed upon 2% GDP.   Countries have made efforts, but it is a process and with time, they will achieve it.

But the other countries have leaders whom understand how treaties and governments work and simply view Trump as a meandering buffoon, a standard caricature of American Politics.

 

Oh and I almost forgot.. for good measure   OBAMA!!!!

Last edited by MonkeysUncleByMarriage
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Crash, our village idiot, should not use the phrase "low info" in a defammatory manner as he only insults himself.  Of course, we should expect an idiot to act in such a mannner.

The cancer of our country are liberals, Trump is the cure.  #winningfeelsgood!

there you have it... all anyone has to do is read your posts. you prove my point with every little click. ha!

the 'cancers of our country' are hypocrisy and stupidity... and you belong to the party of both. #lowinfohoob 

 

thanks obama!

Last edited by Crash.Override
MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:
Stanky posted:
MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:

This is also coming from the party whom in recent polling almost half said they had a "favorable" impression of Putin.  This shows you how little informed they truly are.   A murderous dictator whom literally has opposition murdered and runs a police state with little freedom and deplorable living conditions, yet they view him favorably.   Amazing!  


OBAMA!!!!

Putin is the murderous dictator the hypocritical left didn't mind Hellery Clinton selling 20% of our Uranium reserves for Bubba's speaking fees and foundation gifts. Putin is also the guy whose hackers had free access to the servers of the US along with the Chinese without the present histrionics until Clinton lost. Putin is also the guy who made Obama look like a wuss.

Putin is also a guy with a large nuclear arsenal and a failing economy because oil prices tanked. If stoopid Trump can scare the other NATO members into investing in their militaries even if his language is imprecise, he can prevent Putin from using the invasion economic stimulus. 

1. ) Again continuing with another false narrative put forward by the Trump campaign (as I said, he shovels it in, they eat it up.)    Clinton simply did not sell 20% of the uranium to Russia.  There is simply no factual basis for yet another salacious Trump Idiocracy claim.

No, Hillary Clinton did not "give Russia 20 percent of the uranium” in the US

http://www.vox.com/world/2017/...inton-russia-uranium

 

"Trump is referring to Russia’s nuclear power agency purchasing a majority stake in a Toronto-based energy company between 2009 and 2013. The company had mines and land in a number of US states with huge uranium production capacity — a move the USState Department signed off on. But PolitiFact did a thorough fact-check of the claim last year when Trump first made it on the campaign trail, and found the following faults with it:

  1. The mines, mills, and land the company holds in the US account for 20 percent of the US’s uranium production capacity, not actual produced uranium.
  2. The State Department was one of nine federal agencies and a number of additional independent federal and state regulators that signed off on the deal.
  3. President Obama, not Secretary Clinton, was the only person who could’ve vetoed the deal.
  4. Since Russia doesn’t have the legal right to export uranium out of the US, its main goal was likely to gain access to the company’s uranium assets in Kazakhstan.
  5. Crucially, the main national security concern was not about nuclear weapons proliferation, as Trump suggests, but actually ensuring the US doesn’t have to depend too much on uranium sources from abroad, as the US only makes about 20 percent of the uranium it needs. An advantage in making nuclear weapons wasn’t the main issue because, as PolitiFact notes, “the United States and Russia had for years cooperated on that front, with Russia sending enriched fuel from decommissioned warheads to be used in American nuclear power plants in return for raw uranium.”

 

Republicans never let facts or research get in the way of a good argument.

 

2.) Russian hackers were an issue well before Clinton lost.   In fact, Trump and Clinton both spoke on it numerous times during the campaign and well before the election. But I am sure you are referring to the Commander-In-Tweets ignorant tweet of "Unless you catch "hackers" in the act, it is very hard to determine who was doing the hacking. Why wasn't this brought up before election?" on December 12th."   As I have stated MANY times, Trump tweets recklessly and his mindless subjects eat it up as fact.

13 Times Russian Hacking Came up in the Presidential Campaign 

http://www.npr.org/2016/12/12/...residential-campaign

 

3.) Trump isn't going to "scare" anyone into using their money properly.   We (The US) have been in an ongoing effort to get the other countries to increase their spending to the agreed upon 2% GDP.   Countries have made efforts, but it is a process and with time, they will achieve it.

But the other countries have leaders whom understand how treaties and governments work and simply view Trump as a meandering buffoon, a standard caricature of American Politics.

 

Oh and I almost forgot.. for good measure   OBAMA!!!!

You might want to give a right wing rag a piece of your mind then:

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/0...um-company.html?_r=0

OBAMA (Same as Nixon!)

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×