Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Stanky posted:

It's certainly obvious that the Old Communist Party got most of it's agenda enacted, especially item 17. The education system is failing our children.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1561529/posts

 

______

Those alleged 45  goals were ginned up by a theocratic extremist Mormon NUT, W. Cleon Skousen.  

See all images

Cleon Skousen

"Willard Cleon Skousen was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist who believed that the United States Constitution creates a christian theocracy. He was also a prolific popularizer among Latter-day Saints of their theology. A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society, Skousen's works involved a wide range of subjects including the Six-Day War, Mormon eschatology, New World Order conspiracies, and parenting. His most popular works are The 5,000 Year Leap and The Naked Communist. A book by Skousen on end times prophecy, The Cleansing of America, was published by Valor Publishing Group in 2010, four years after his death."
 
A Florida Congressman and Skousen disciple  read this junk into the Congressional Record, which gives it no status in particular, since Congressional representatives introduce all kinds of absurd stuff  into the Record.
 
Read more about this deranged John  Bircher here:

It sure seems those Mormons found the liberal "To Do" list more than five decades ago; but they missed the election proselytizing of Kerry. Well maybe it's in an appendix somewhere. Most commencement speeches that I remember from the past were apolitical. Even with the possible Kerry omission, mebbe Mormons are the chosen ones after all and have foreseen the election of the devil's sister. 

Last edited by Stanky

Frankly I wish the Democrats had someone to run like Evan Bayh whom I think would have been a terrific candidate.  Although I have a lot to dislike regarding some Republicans  I cannot possibly see anyone finding Hillary acceptable.  The main problem that I have with her revolves around Benghazi and her performance prior to it as well as how she handled it and especially the way she has treated and approached the family members of those that died in the battle.

First of all there should be no way that anyone would consider her qualified to hold the highest office in the land when she called the relatives, of those killed, liars regarding what they reported she said, to them, about why their relatives that were killed in the attack on the compound there.  When their bodies were brought back and at the ceremony I have no doubt that Hillary said exactly what each family member said she said which was that a YouTube video was responsible for the attacks all the while knowing different.  EVERY family member recounted exactly what they were told and EVERY family member's account matched the other families exactly.  Hillary though says they ALL are lying about what she said and that she did not say what they reported she said. 

I have no doubt she said that because she, and the Obama administration, allowed, if not dictated, Susan Rice to go on the Sunday morning talk shows peddling the same lie about the cause of the attack all the while knowing different.   Now what she's doing may not be illegal but it's totally immoral and horrendus to do that and continue to do that to the families who already paid such a huge price.  Additionally it was Hillary's responsibility to arrange for and approve security for each compound and she totally failed in doing that, on of all days, September 11th.  There has been so much deceit and coverup and secrecy as surrounding Benghazi that even staunch Democratic supporters should want to know why and how it happened and why a lie was allowed to be spent to the American people without repercussions to those who perpetrated it.   

Other, still, unknowns was where was Obama and why wasn't he more involved in decisions to respond to the attack?  Exactly who made the stand down order to stop troops and responses that could have possibly saved at least two of the lives that were lost if not more?  This colossal failure would have never been allowed to go without complete investigation and accountability IF it had been under Republican leadership and responsibility.  Failure for any Democrat to hold their own people to accountability is inconceivable in any democracy and totally hypocritical on anyone's part that agrees with what has happened.

While most all of it has been allowed to be swept under the rug and covered up the least that we, ordinary  Americans, can do is see that the chief one in direct command over Benghazi is not further rewarded by allowing her election to the Presidency.  She surely doesn't deserve it but more than that has proven herself unqualified for leadership and incapable of doing the job of Secretary of State.  Hers should have been the first  job terminated or resigned followed by several more.  I dare say IF this had been under a Republican administration and the Democrats held the house that there would have been impeachment proceedings generated and most likely the President would have been impeached if he was Republican.  Failure to get to the bottom of things rest on the Republicans totally and their agreement to remove impeachment off the table shows their own incapability for leadership.  They are so afraid of being called racist that they are willing to circumvent the checks and balances provided them in the Constitution as well as putting politics above any other part of their job's requirements.  Even if they do come forward with additional information regarding Benghazi at this time it's evident that they are playing politics with it rather than doing their job as it should have been done some three to four years ago.  They are detestable in the way they are handling it as well as the Democrats were in their own cover-ups. 

It's politics and politicians at their worst and a cooperative media going along with it.  The American people, with their acceptance and reluctance to complain as well as their complacency about being lied to with the YouTube video story has it to their shame but the Families of those killed are the real ultimate losers for they not only have lost loved ones but still have no solid answers to provide any measure of closure for what more and more appears as useless and preventable ultimate losses.   And that's why at the very least, even Democrats, should not allow Hillary to be their parties candidate for President.  Not even considering the email situation, Benghazi should prevent her from even getting out of the primary's as the candidate.  But that's my own opinion, I'm still upset over Democratic Healthcare ( that UN-affordable healthcare bill that the Democrats solely forced upon everyone that even to today no one knows how bad it is nor what all it saddles us with).

Last edited by gbrk
Stanky posted:

It sure seems those Mormons found the liberal "To Do" list more than five decades ago; but they missed the election proselytizing of Kerry. Well maybe it's in an appendix somewhere. Most commencement speeches that I remember from the past were apolitical. Even with the possible Kerry omission, mebbe Mormons are the chosen ones after all and have foreseen the election of the devil's sister. 

____

And maybe "those Mormons" just have an inherent tendency to produce theocratic crackpots. After all, they were founded by a world-class crackpot, Joseph Smith

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×