Trump spokesperson

Many who wanted to attend probably did not out of fear of physical violence/injury being perpetuated by the left.  I would not have taken my family to DC knowing full well the left was planning to "disrupt" the inauguration.  The thuggery of the left was on full display for all the nation to see. 

Jack Flash posted:
Crash.Override posted:

turns out you can have your 'own facts'.. if you're a republican.

Facts are facts, we don't lie or cheat like the dems, so having
our own facts is handy.

thanks.... i needed a good laugh , today.... trump has done nothing but lie , but no way a republicon could see it.... not with their head so far up their ass, anyway.

Crash.Override posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Crash.Override posted:

turns out you can have your 'own facts'.. if you're a republican.

Namely?

   nobody is this stupid.  maybe if i said 'alternative facts' you'd understand.

Certainly appears you can, in fact, be that stupid.  I ask a simple question and you give a stupid answer.

uandurine posted:
Whoa there, please settle down before this escalates into capital letters and exclamation points.

The thing about snowflakes is, if you ask them to support their allegations, they usually respond with questions as to your level of education (or lack thereof) and/or how stupid you are.  A tired and overplayed tactic that has no more substance than the allegations they made in the first place.  Actions speak far louder than words, and their actions have shown that they have no idea what they are even talking about.

Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Crash.Override posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Crash.Override posted:

turns out you can have your 'own facts'.. if you're a republican.

Namely?

   nobody is this stupid.  maybe if i said 'alternative facts' you'd understand.

Certainly appears you can, in fact, be that stupid.  I ask a simple question and you give a stupid answer.

so far, you've ignored the fact that trump has lied about the inauguration numbers, signed executive orders that raise mortgages guaranteed by the FHA, not to mention , just yesterday, he gave china a HUGE upper hand by doing away with the TPP. he's filled his cabinet with execs from goldman sacks after railing about hillary and goldman sacks. refused to release his tax returns. his staff is under investigation for illegal communications with russia.... and the list grows daily.. but, that's perfectly fine for the low information voters..... as witnessed in the above posts.

when you ask a stupid question, i try to keep my response at a level you're capable of understanding.

Crash says, "he's filled his cabinet with execs from goldman sacks after railing about hillary and goldman sacks"

First off, it's not "Sacks", it is Sachs.

See below for who Trump has picked to fill cabinet level positions. 

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...net-white-house.html

Your statement regarding China having an upper hand by doing away with the TPP is speculation, not a fact.

Being under investigation does not mean you are guilty of anything, per the law.  Clinton would be buried under the prison if that were true.

The FHA reduction you speak of was amounted to a quarter of a percentage point that was enacted by BO during his last weeks in office.  Purely political and had nothing to do with helping anyone out.

Seeing as how you don't even understand the words that leave your mouth, you may want to dumb it down a little more so that maybe you'll understand.

 

Crash.Override posted:

and there you have it... low information voter spewing rt. wingnut 'alternative facts'... but, trump  loves his uneducated voters.

No problem with Flynn's phone call, the goobermint even listened in on the conversation: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...ynn-post-Russia.html

China isn't part of the TPP deal, but other countries will happily ream our middle class including another communist country: 

Study: Trans-Pacific Trade Pact to Favor Japan, Vietnam and Malaysia 

http://www.sdcexec.com/news/12...vietnam-and-malaysia

Also the FHA is still putting people in houses they can't afford as I have seen close to home. At least the banks learned the lesson of the 2008 crash and burn.

Crash.Override posted:

and there you have it... low information voter spewing rt. wingnut 'alternative facts'... but, trump  loves his uneducated voters.

Take a breather tadpole, obviously you aren't aware of the
demographics concerning the American voter and the other
voters that vote in America.

two of the largest bigots and dumbest posters to ever visit these forums are hurling insults at me.. wow. i must be doing something right. 

stanky, the results of our backing out of the TPP will be obvious, shortly.. watch how china uses this to their advantage and the US loses bigly.

Hoob, I'm sorta surprised that you would post all the nominees. A lot of them are members of one or the other "B" club. (supply your own meaning)

Crash, I think you are gonna lose, these guys really have good sources, Russian officials and Fox news. I don't know which is the most reliable.

JT, the reason crash always loses is the same reason condie
always lost, no defendable leg to stand on and the reason you
can't help him is you're both a cnn/msnbc slave...... When a
person is detached to the point they don't know hellery at
this point in time,,,, they are too stupid to vote... 
Crash.Override posted:

two of the largest bigots and dumbest posters to ever visit these forums are hurling insults at me.. wow. i must be doing something right. 

stanky, the results of our backing out of the TPP will be obvious, shortly.. watch how china uses this to their advantage and the US loses bigly.

The only potentially positive thing to come from TPP would be if you owned Nike stock and that would only last a little while. Vietnam would eat China's lunch up until the PLA overrun the sneaker factories or the Chinese navy blockades the ports.

Anyway, free trade only works for all parties if is fair trade among equals. It would be possible to cut good trade deals with countries like Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and some British Commonwealth countries in the region, but not when those countries are expecting the same deals offered by the Obama administration's congenital idiots. 

Crash.Override posted:

two of the largest bigots and dumbest posters to ever visit these forums are hurling insults at me.. wow. i must be doing something right. 

stanky, the results of our backing out of the TPP will be obvious, shortly.. watch how china uses this to their advantage and the US loses bigly.

Not to worry, as long as you're posting, we'll always be at worst #2 and #3 in the list of bigots and dummies.  Keep posting from your little hate filled heart, it suits you well!

Am I mistaken or was the TPP still sitting on Obama's desk?  It had never been ratified because the Congress had backed off of it, since it was such a bad deal.  Obama was supporting it, but it had no support in the legislature, and therefore was going to die anyways.  These one sided trade deals are killing the middle class, and at least Trump has enough business acumen to see it and enough testicular fortitude to do something about it.

Are there any trade pacts where the US is not disadvantaged?  The trade deficit with Mexico alone is in the 10's of Billions of dollars.  I'd hate to know what it is with China.

We finally have a president who is going to put the needs of Americans first.  Been a long time since that has happened.

Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Crash.Override posted:

two of the largest bigots and dumbest posters to ever visit these forums are hurling insults at me.. wow. i must be doing something right. 

stanky, the results of our backing out of the TPP will be obvious, shortly.. watch how china uses this to their advantage and the US loses bigly.

Not to worry, as long as you're posting, we'll always be at worst #2 and #3 in the list of bigots and dummies.  Keep posting from your little hate filled heart, it suits you well!

Trump starts draining the swamp and sure enough, crash crawls out.

Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:

I would point out that Hillary came out against it as well.

And she was for it before it was politically expedient to be against it. If she won, it would've taken just a small donation to the Clinton Foundation to give the TPP a name change to make the new TPP the best thing since the 1999 China deal.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...illary-clinton-open/

No, doubt. However, its a good argument to use against Democrats.  Catches them in a dilemma, either Hillary agreed with Trump, or Hillary's a lying opportunist.

direstraits posted:
Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:

I would point out that Hillary came out against it as well.

And she was for it before it was politically expedient to be against it. If she won, it would've taken just a small donation to the Clinton Foundation to give the TPP a name change to make the new TPP the best thing since the 1999 China deal.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...illary-clinton-open/

No, doubt. However, its a good argument to use against Democrats.  Catches them in a dilemma, either Hillary agreed with Trump, or Hillary's a lying opportunist.

Actually both statements are true, Hillary agreed with Trump (and Bernie Sanders) and she's a lying opportunist. No dilemma there!

Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:
Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:

I would point out that Hillary came out against it as well.

And she was for it before it was politically expedient to be against it. If she won, it would've taken just a small donation to the Clinton Foundation to give the TPP a name change to make the new TPP the best thing since the 1999 China deal.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...illary-clinton-open/

No, doubt. However, its a good argument to use against Democrats.  Catches them in a dilemma, either Hillary agreed with Trump, or Hillary's a lying opportunist.

Actually both statements are true, Hillary agreed with Trump (and Bernie Sanders) and she's a lying opportunist. No dilemma there!

The proposed dilemma would exist in the Democrat's brain  -- an organ of limited functionality.

Bestworking posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Crash.Override posted:

two of the largest bigots and dumbest posters to ever visit these forums are hurling insults at me.. wow. i must be doing something right. 

stanky, the results of our backing out of the TPP will be obvious, shortly.. watch how china uses this to their advantage and the US loses bigly.

Not to worry, as long as you're posting, we'll always be at worst #2 and #3 in the list of bigots and dummies.  Keep posting from your little hate filled heart, it suits you well!

Trump starts draining the swamp and sure enough, crash crawls out.

you're a **** fool... trump filled his cabinet with bigger gators, but you trump supporters are too stupid to see. 'draining the swamp' means hiring Goldman Sachs to run our country.... after vilifying hillary for 'being run by goldman sachs'. at some point the bubble will finally bust and republicans will make a run on anti-depressants.

when exactly are the republicans gonna launch an investigation into trump's staff using a private email server?  or when's the republican investigation of trump using an unsecured telephone and email address, since taking office?  it sure was a big deal, before the election... seems to not be such an issue, now.

Crash.Override posted:

when exactly are the republicans gonna launch an investigation into trump's staff using a private email server?  or when's the republican investigation of trump using an unsecured telephone and email address, since taking office?  it sure was a big deal, before the election... seems to not be such an issue, now.

I thought you knew about Trump signing a executive order
giving him a pass for email, fones and all other items he deems
bothersome. Do you know the difference between a flip and the
E/I and smart phones.? Didn't think so, but that doesn't mean
I don't appreciate your brilliance.   

 

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×