The beat Trump to the punch with their lawsuit:
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Contendahh posted:The beat Trump to the punch with their lawsuit:
"The" beat?
giftedamateur posted:Contendahh posted:The beat Trump to the punch with their lawsuit:
"The" beat?
_____
Obviously--to all but the cognitively impaired, the intended word was "They."
Now do you have any substantive comment?
Condie loves to correct others. But, gets prissy when others correct him.
This suit will probably be dismissed as those suing have no standing -- can't show how they would be harmed. Remember Trump stated he could sue because he had standing.
direstraits posted:Condie loves to correct others. But, gets prissy when others correct him.
This suit will probably be dismissed as those suing have no standing -- can't show how they would be harmed. Remember Trump stated he could sue because he had standing.
_____
We will see whether YOUR opinion of standing prevails. The court could rule that any citizen who is registered to vote has standing to object to someone running for an office for which said citizen is qualified to vote, but who is not constitutionally qualified to do so, but others see it differently as below:
.http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/15/lawsuit-questions-ted-cruzs-eligibility-to-be-president/
Additional information; here is a copy of the lawsuit: http://www.scribd.com/doc/2991...inst-Ted-Cruz#scribd
Contendahh posted:direstraits posted:Condie loves to correct others. But, gets prissy when others correct him.
This suit will probably be dismissed as those suing have no standing -- can't show how they would be harmed. Remember Trump stated he could sue because he had standing.
_____
We will see whether YOUR opinion of standing prevails. The court could rule that any citizen who is registered to vote has standing to object to someone running for an office for which said citizen is qualified to vote, but who is not constitutionally qualified to do so, but others see it differently as below:
.http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/15/lawsuit-questions-ted-cruzs-eligibility-to-be-president/
Contenduhh, the courts shot the birthers contesting Obama down for exactly the reason I stated for those supporting Trump. Have you forgotten already? There are some treatments for that, now.
direstraits posted:Contendahh posted:direstraits posted:Condie loves to correct others. But, gets prissy when others correct him.
This suit will probably be dismissed as those suing have no standing -- can't show how they would be harmed. Remember Trump stated he could sue because he had standing.
_____
We will see whether YOUR opinion of standing prevails. The court could rule that any citizen who is registered to vote has standing to object to someone running for an office for which said citizen is qualified to vote, but who is not constitutionally qualified to do so, but others see it differently as below:
.http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/15/lawsuit-questions-ted-cruzs-eligibility-to-be-president/
Contenduhh, the courts shot the birthers contesting Obama down for exactly the reason I stated for those supporting Trump. Have you forgotten already? There are some treatments for that, now.
___
Not "exactly the same reason." Too bad you can't see the difference, but I can accept your cognitive limitations as impairing your analytical capabilities.
Contendahh posted:direstraits posted:Contendahh posted:direstraits posted:Condie loves to correct others. But, gets prissy when others correct him.
This suit will probably be dismissed as those suing have no standing -- can't show how they would be harmed. Remember Trump stated he could sue because he had standing.
_____
We will see whether YOUR opinion of standing prevails. The court could rule that any citizen who is registered to vote has standing to object to someone running for an office for which said citizen is qualified to vote, but who is not constitutionally qualified to do so, but others see it differently as below:
.http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/15/lawsuit-questions-ted-cruzs-eligibility-to-be-president/
Contenduhh, the courts shot the birthers contesting Obama down for exactly the reason I stated for those supporting Trump. Have you forgotten already? There are some treatments for that, now.
___
Not "exactly the same reason." Too bad you can't see the difference, but I can accept your cognitive limitations as impairing your analytical capabilities.
The circumstances are almost identical.