Skip to main content

Finish what I posted jt. You know what I mean, don't act like you think it means something else. You're the one that said if their cameras are turned off or malfunction they are guilty, no questions asked. Don't pretend you care.

-------------------------

You posted, "Cops lives don't matter". I posted that when a cop's camera malfunctions everytime there is an excessive force complaint, he needs to be checked out, and he does need to be checked out. If the camera was working before and started working after the incident, look at him very seriously.  As for the "don't pretend you care" statement, I've got more caring and compassion for my fellowman in my little finger than you do in your entire body.

Yeah, you like your 'fellowman' if they're giving you something or taking something from someone else for you.  I know what you posted, don't try to act like you care.

-------------------------

Truth be known, you probably cost the general public more than me. Don't accuse me of taking when you run some type of sweat shop. If you know what I posted, you know you post LIES about me. 

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Yeah, you like your 'fellowman' if they're giving you something or taking something from someone else for you.  I know what you posted, don't try to act like you care.

-------------------------

Truth be known, you probably cost the general public more than me. Don't accuse me of taking when you run some type of sweat shop. If you know what I posted, you know you post LIES about me. 

================

What kind of sweat shop do I run? Got proof of that? You've said a few times I cost the public money, when I ask how, you run. What lies jt? I only "repeat" what you have posted. You've admitted you will take and take and never say you have enough, even if it means someone else could have a job if you stopped after having more than enough. Your words, not mine. Now, tell me what kind of a sweat shop I run.

Last edited by Bestworking

This is the definition  of a sweat shop. This is what you just accused me of running. I want you to post why you think you can make such false claims.

 ================

Sweatshop (or sweat factory) is a pejorative term for a workplace that has socially unacceptable working conditions. The work may be difficult, dangerous or be paid a wage that is not commensurate. Workers in 'sweatshops' may work long hours for low pay, regardless of laws mandating overtime pay or a minimum wage; child labor laws may also be violated.

Last edited by Bestworking

You've admitted you will take and take and never say you have enough, even if it means someone else could have a job if you stopped after having more than enough. Your words, not mine. 

----------------------

Those are your lying words. I said that I did not have the power to take a pay cut. When I went on the job, the pay and conditions had already been set. I could have quit and someone else would have been hired at the same pay. What I am saying is, when I went to a job, it was take it or leave it. I couldn't set my pay and conditions. Will you ever understand that when you are represented by a union, you take what they negotiate for. Why did I ask if you understand? My bad.

No they are NOT LYING words. You tried the excuse you couldn't take a pay cut and I made it clear that it was a 'what if' question, meaning for the sake of the question let us say you would have been able to refuse raises, there was no union involved. You said you wouldn't refuse money even then. You can take your sweat shop crap and shove it where the sun don't shine. We don't run our business like that. You lefties think everyone is as low down and cheating as you are. People doing the right thing without having to be forced to do it is an outlandish idea to you lefties.

My favorite liberal democrat story.

 

It was revealed today that the Today co-host - who earns $30million a year for his role - will not be saving jobs at the morning show by offering to take slash his salary - despite Matt being one of the reasons the show is in trouble.

A number of employees were handed their pink slips on Monday at the same time it was announced 500 employees, or 1.5 per cent of its work force, will be cut.

 

A source told RadarOnline:'It's only a matter of time before job cuts are made in the NBC news division, which includes the Today show.

'Staffers are convinced there will be significant job  losses because of the cost-cutting measures that are being done across  the board by Comcast, which now owns a majority stake in NBC.

'The crew believes that some of the  potential cuts could be avoided if Matt agreed to a pay cut. His salary  is a whopping $30 million dollars a year, and it’s  seriously crippling the show.

 

 

'But he has made it pretty clear that he  won’t take a pay decrease, so instead the staffers are in line for the  chop.'

 

Two months ago, The Tonight Show with Jay Leno eliminated about two dozen of its crew in an effort to reduce  the late-night program's budget.

 

Leno took a voluntary 50 per cent pay cut, which single-handedly slimmed the show's overall budget by 20 per  cent. Even with this, 20 staff members lost their jobs.

 

Not pleased: Though Matt Lauer tried to assure Curry of her contributions to the show, it was clear to viewers that she was shown the door

See more of it.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...efusing-pay-cut.html

 

Let me get this straight. Best and Jack/Vic are saying that people who make millions of dollars and don't share the wealth with the lower income workers in their field are bad? If they don't take a pay cut to save the jobs of other workers then they are low down cheaters. Wow... we might actually agree on something. Have they suddenly become liberals?

 

You are right Jack! He should take a pay cut if it would save the jobs of others. No one that sits on a couch and discusses current events, and the latest movie premiere is worth 30 million a year. Neither is the fat cat CEO's that spend their days at the country club playing golf and having martinis. Income inequality is out of control in this country. 

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

Let me get this straight. Best and Jack/Vic are saying that people who make millions of dollars and don't share the wealth with the lower income workers in their field are bad? If they don't take a pay cut to save the jobs of other workers then they are low down cheaters. Wow... we might actually agree on something. Have they suddenly become liberals?

 

You are right Jack! He should take a pay cut if it would save the jobs of others. No one that sits on a couch and discusses current events, and the latest movie premiere is worth 30 million a year. Neither is the fat cat CEO's that spend their days at the country club playing golf and having martinis. Income inequality is out of control in this country. 

________________________________________________________

Not arguing the worth of a TV show which is one of many not attracting the number of viewers it once did and, thus, the ability to attract advertisers willing to pay more for the d slots. That is a gven.

 

However, with Jank's snide little remarks about what CEOs do for a living, she does present one true thing -- that she knows absolutely nothing about business, which I suspected, already.

Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

Let me get this straight. Best and Jack/Vic are saying that people who make millions of dollars and don't share the wealth with the lower income workers in their field are bad? If they don't take a pay cut to save the jobs of other workers then they are low down cheaters. Wow... we might actually agree on something. Have they suddenly become liberals?

 

You are right Jack! He should take a pay cut if it would save the jobs of others. No one that sits on a couch and discusses current events, and the latest movie premiere is worth 30 million a year. Neither is the fat cat CEO's that spend their days at the country club playing golf and having martinis. Income inequality is out of control in this country. 

________________________________________________________

Not arguing the worth of a TV show which is one of many not attracting the number of viewers it once did and, thus, the ability to attract advertisers willing to pay more for the d slots. That is a gven.

 

However, with Jank's snide little remarks about what CEOs do for a living, she does present one true thing -- that she knows absolutely nothing about business, which I suspected, already.

______________________

 

LOL Yeah, because CEO's NEVER do that. Right.... And I'm the one that knows nothing? Maybe you haven't ever been invited along for these "business meetings". As a sales rep I spent a lot of years dealing with CEO's. I spent a good bit of my time in restaurants, clubs, on golf courses, and on boats. They would spend 15 minutes talking business and then they were done for the day. Tough job, but someone has to do it, right?

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

Let me get this straight. Best and Jack/Vic are saying that people who make millions of dollars and don't share the wealth with the lower income workers in their field are bad? If they don't take a pay cut to save the jobs of other workers then they are low down cheaters. Wow... we might actually agree on something. Have they suddenly become liberals?

 

You are right Jack! He should take a pay cut if it would save the jobs of others. No one that sits on a couch and discusses current events, and the latest movie premiere is worth 30 million a year. Neither is the fat cat CEO's that spend their days at the country club playing golf and having martinis. Income inequality is out of control in this country. 

________________________________________________________

Not arguing the worth of a TV show which is one of many not attracting the number of viewers it once did and, thus, the ability to attract advertisers willing to pay more for the d slots. That is a gven.

 

However, with Jank's snide little remarks about what CEOs do for a living, she does present one true thing -- that she knows absolutely nothing about business, which I suspected, already.

______________________

 

LOL Yeah, because CEO's NEVER do that. Right.... And I'm the one that knows nothing? Maybe you haven't ever been invited along for these "business meetings". As a sales rep I spent a lot of years dealing with CEO's. I spent a good bit of my time in restaurants, clubs, on golf courses, and on boats. They would spend 15 minutes talking business and then they were done for the day. Tough job, but someone has to do it, right?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jank, you seem to have spent quite a bit of time wining, dining and playing games or were you a cook, bartender, dishwasher and caddy?  I've had contact with many medium sized corporations and that was not their CEOs lifestyle. 

I have been all those things at different times in my life, except a caddy. But, no I stated I was a sales rep. It's right there in plain English. 

 

Since we are talking million dollar salaries then I doubt we are talking about the same kind of CEO's. Just because you haven't experienced it doesn't mean its not reality Dire. That seems to be a big problem you have. If you didn't see it or live it then it just isn't true. Pretty small bubble you live in. 

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

I have been all those things at different times in my life, except a caddy. But, no I stated I was a sales rep. It's right there in plain English. 

 

Since we are talking million dollar salaries then I doubt we are talking about the same kind of CEO's. Just because you haven't experienced it doesn't mean its not reality Dire. That seems to be a big problem you have. If you didn't see it or live it then it just isn't true. Pretty small bubble you live in. 

______________________________________________________

The corporations we audited has income in the low billions.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

No they are NOT LYING words. 

----------

sure they are. They are your words.

No, they are your words reposted by me.

=============================

You should tell it all, my words reposted and reworded by you.

===================

Oh, so you really said, "I would be ever so glad to give up any raise when I felt I had more than enough to live on to allow someone else to have a job"? Naw, you didn't say that. You said the other thing. You wouldn't turn down money. But you think others should.

BTW jt, how much do you think the lefties favorite politicians and crap stirrers make? Let's discuss them for a while and give the CEOs a break. Start with the clintons. Then move on to kerry, obama, gore, reid, pelosi, sharpton, jackson etc. I would add soros, but of course you avoid discussing him like the plague!! Oh what the heck, soros. We'll touch on the rich stars and sports figure lefties later on.

Best, I will repeat this one last time.  

I worked temporary work out of a union hall. The union would offer me the chance to go to a temporary job. The wages and benefits were already set. I could take it or leave it. I did not have the power to ask for more or less money. I could not make them hire more workers. I could quit and the contractor would call the hall and get one person to replace me. 

This is several times I have posted this. Now, you can twist these words and  show everyone your true colors.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Best, I will repeat this one last time.  

I worked temporary work out of a union hall. The union would offer me the chance to go to a temporary job. The wages and benefits were already set. I could take it or leave it. I did not have the power to ask for more or less money. I could not make them hire more workers. I could quit and the contractor would call the hall and get one person to replace me. 

This is several times I have posted this. Now, you can twist these words and  show everyone your true colors.

=================

Jt, that is the excuse you always made. What's wrong with you? Why do you keep posting that bull about the union and how you 'had' to take it. You know darn well I said for the sake of the discussion we'd pretend you didn't have to take it, no unions, no nothing, and you did have the power to turn it down. You said you still wouldn't turn down any money. No twisting involved. It's just a fact, you lefties would never turn down a dime, but you sure as heck love to attack SOME rich people. Of course you don't attack the rich lefties. I think it's you that people see 'how you are'.

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by jtdavis:

BTW jt, how much do you think the lefties favorite politicians and crap stirrers make? Let's discuss them for a while and give the CEOs a break. 

------------------

You are the one who has started naming political parties. I said get the big money out. All of it.

===========================

BS, you say get the Koch brothers out of it. Show me ONE place you've said to get soros out of it.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

BS, you say get the Koch brothers out of it. Show me ONE place you've said to get soros out of it.

-----------------------

Refresh my memory. Please tell me when I have said get the Koch money out of politics? I know I have said get the big money out of politics, both parties.

====================

Jt goes into his dumb act. Well, I don't think it is an act.

BS, you say get the Koch brothers out of it. Show me ONE place you've said to get soros out of it.

-----------------------

Refresh my memory. Please tell me when I have said get the Koch money out of politics? I know I have said get the big money out of politics, both parties.

====================

Jt goes into his dumb act. Well, I don't think it is an act.

--------------------------------

Can't do it can you?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×