Two words that may mean bad news

I'll be one of the most surprised persons around IF the FBI or Justice Department does indicte Hillary.  If she was a Republican or anyone else she would have long been held accountable before but given who she is and the fact that she is the chief hope of the Democratic party for 2016 there is no way that she will be held accountable.  Anymore there can be no honest dialog that reflects guilt or ends up being negative if the recipitant is female or of a minority status because any more the rationale behind any discussion is corrupted and assumed to be racist or sexist rather than substantial. 

If Hillary is elected President then the Republicans can go ahead and make a blanket statement that they are removing impeachment off the table for the next four to eight years, with regards to anything Hillary might do, account whatever reason there might be to consider impeachment would be seen to be sexist just as with Obama it would be considered racist.  There could be no way that any group consisting of a majority of white men could negatively impact Americas first and only black, minority, President and likewise the same will apply to the first and only Woman President when and if that person is elected. 

It's essentially a recipe and mandate to violate any and all laws and instructions associated with the office.  The constitution is no longer valid and the defining document with respect to governing our nation and defining the powers that reside within each office.  We, in America, are at a defining and dangerous time and liberals should take note as much as anyone else.

With this next Supreme Court appointment along with the FACT that we now have a political Supreme Court we are at a point in our Nation's history that the constitution becomes obsolete and ineffective.  The nine Justices, that we have now, have as much as demonstrated that interpretation of the constitution is no longer their emphasis but rather the political leanings of the Justices themselves.  Judicial  precedent is no longer a valid guideline and we have reached a point where politicians rather than justices seek to legislate from the judicial bench rather than seek to interpret meaning and original intent. 

With the 9th Justice appointed and confirmed, if that appointment is made by Hillary or a Democrat then the 2nd amendment is very much in play and in doubt and subject to alteration and change.  If 5 of the 9 justices decide that given our current society is so different from that which brought about the original 2nd amendment then they can just rule and decide that the original intent of the founders was flawed and based upon a situation and condition that no longer applies or is relevant and thus change the interpretation to meet and favor more stringent or punitive gun control laws. 

It's not beyond speculation that a liberal, political, Court would even rule that possession of firearms of a certain type would be unconstitutional and pave the way for the federal Government to require certain types of firearms to be turned in an no longer possessed by citizens.  I know that sounds impossible and impractical but the Supreme Court is the ultimate stopping point for laws.  Congress may make the laws and the President sign off on them and make them law and the Constitution can only change an amendment or create one by a lengthy and difficult procedure but a 5 justice liberal bloc on the Supreme Court can just CHANGE the way that a current amendment is viewed or defined and thus change and alter it by decision of 5 people rather than the process defined by the constitution itself for changing it.

I very much believe that with this Supreme Court vacancy and the potential that it may be a political appointment that we are at a point in our Nation's history that it's very possible that we may and can see a citizen revolt.  I expected to see such a revolt over the Healthcare decision and possibly the only reason one did not come was that Justice Roberts was considered a conservative Judge and was responsible for the ultimate decision to make it legal even though it is surely evident that it gives the Federal Government unprecedented power that the founders never intended the Government to have.  Even a non-legal type person can realize that Democratic Healthcare gives the Federal Government powers and control that the founders cautioned against yet we now have it as law based upon defining it as a tax when only the court itself calls and defines it as a tax. 

In similar form and process any area of our Government the Constitution is at risk of being redefined or changed and altered from the original intent. It is or can be a dangerous and volatile time. 

NOTHING will happen to the criminal hilliary. The demoslops in power will see to that.

Hopefully, the Dems won't be in power next year.