Skip to main content

http://www.history.com/topics/selma-montgomery-march

 

In early 1965, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) made Selma, Alabama, the focus of its efforts to register black voters in the South. That March, protesters attempting to march from Selma to the state capital of Montgomery were met with violent resistance by state and local authorities. As the world watched, the protesters (under the protection of federalized National Guard troops) finally achieved their goal, walking around the clock for three days to reach Montgomery. The historic march, and King's participation in it, greatly helped raise awareness of the difficulty faced by black voters in the South, and the need for a Voting Rights Act, passed later that year.

 

Voter Registration Efforts In Selma

Even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbade discrimination in voting on the basis of race, efforts by civil rights organizations such as the Southern Christian Leadership Council (SCLC) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) to register black voters met with fierce resistance in southern states such as Alabama. In early 1965, Martin Luther King Jr. and SCLC decided to make Selma, located in Dallas County, Alabama, the focus of a voter registration campaign. Alabama Governor George Wallace was a notorious opponent of desegregation, and the local county sheriff in Dallas County had led a steadfast opposition to black voter registration drives. As a result, only 2 percent of Selma's eligible black voters (300 out of 15,000) had managed to register. 

King had won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, and his higher profile would help draw international attention to Selma during the eventful months that followed. On February 18, white segregationists attacked a group of peaceful demonstrators in the nearby town of Marion. In the ensuing chaos, an Alabama state trooper fatally shot Jimmie Lee Jackson, a young African-American demonstrator. In response to Jackson's death, King and the SCLC planned a massive protest march from Selma to the state capitol of Montgomery, 54 miles away. A group of 600 people set out on Sunday, March 7, but didn't get far before Alabama state troopers wielding whips, nightsticks and tear gas rushed the group at the Edmund Pettis Bridge and beat them back to Selma. The brutal scene was captured on television, enraging many Americans and drawing civil rights and religious leaders of all faiths to Selma in protest.

 

A Historic March

King himself led another attempt on March 9, but turned the marchers around when state troopers again blocked the road. That night, a group of segregationists beat another protester, the young white minister James Reeb, to death. Alabama state officials (led by Walllace) tried to prevent the march from going forward, but a U.S. district court judge ordered them to permit it. President Lyndon Johnson also backed the marchers, going on national television to pledge his support and lobby for passage of new voting rights legislation he was introducing in Congress. Some 2,000 people set out from Selma on March 21, protected by U.S. Army troops and Alabama National Guard forces that Johnson had ordered under federal control. After walking some 12 hours a day and sleeping in fields along the way, they reached Montgomery on March 25.

Nearly 50,000 supporters--black and white--met the marchers in Montgomery, where they gathered in front of the state capitol to hear King and other speakers including Ralph Bunche (winner of the 1950 Nobel Peace Prize) address the crowd. "No tide of racism can stop us," King proclaimed from the building's steps, as viewers from around the world watched the historic moment on television.

Lasting Impact

On March 17, 1965, even as the Selma-to-Montgomery marchers fought for the right to carry out their protest, President Lyndon Johnson addressed a joint session of Congress, calling for federal voting rights legislation to protect African Americans from barriers that prevented them from voting. That August, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, which guaranteed the right to vote (first awarded by the 15th Amendment) to all African Americans. Specifically, the act banned literacy tests as a requirement for voting, mandated federal oversight of voter registration in areas where tests had previously been used, and gave the U.S. attorney general the duty of challenging the use of poll taxes for state and local elections. 

Along with the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act was one of the most expansive pieces of civil rights legislation in American history. Its effects greatly reduced the disparity between black and white voters in the U.S. and allowed a greater number of African Americans to enter political life at the local, state and national level.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I thought that was the job of Jessie Jackson and Al Sharptongue.....Oh wait.....they are just the court jesters (ie, clowns) and have not worked their way up to king status as of yet.....

 

When will people learn that continuing to throw the race card is a defeating purpose.  It is ridiculous to think that racial inequality is anywhere near what was seen in the 1960's.

Who was throwing in the race card? Today is MLK day and I thought it would be nice to recognize what he did here in our own state. I do think we need a lot more people like MLK. This world would be a much nicer place. 

 

 

“An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity.”- MLK

 

“People fail to get along because they fear each other; they fear each other because they don't know each other; they don't know each other because they have not communicated with each other.”-MLK

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Quaildog:

We have students of MLK and they must stay in the faces of racists like we have on this forum.

The two Revs come to mind. Obama must stand fast in his efforts to have a level playing ground for all citizens.

Liberals wouldn't recognize a 'level playing field' if they fell flat on their collective asses in one.

quote:   Originally Posted by Quaildog:

We have students of MLK and they must stay in the faces of racists like we have on this forum.   The two Revs come to mind. Obama must stand fast in his efforts to have a level playing ground for all citizens.

Hi Quail,

 

Does that mean a level playing field for both union and non-union workers?  If so, I agree with you.  

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Obama-Smoking

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Obama-Smoking
Last edited by Bill Gray
Originally Posted by Quaildog:

We have students of MLK and they must stay in the faces of racists like we have on this forum.

The two Revs come to mind. Obama must stand fast in his efforts to have a level playing ground for all citizens.


The playing field is not level QuailClown. The level playing field is skewed by little things such as Affirmative Action.  When a man is too be judged by what he can do and his knowledge of how to do a job, that is an even playing field.  When one requires such things as Affirmative Action in order to get ahead and put people who do not know how to do the job in  paying position, that is the true statement of inequality. And it happens everyday in the US, especially in government jobs.

 

MLK preached and spoke out for equality.  He wanted it to be fair for everyone. He did not go around falsely accusing white boys of rape, disgracing their names, and causing public humiliation when there was no proof that they were guilty.  He did not steal money from his organization and set up housekeeping for younger women.  he did not go on the news programs and call for lynching Hispanic men because they were involved in the shooting of a young black man who was engaged in fighting.

He really was concerned with equality.  I think MLK would be amazed at how his actions changed the face of the country for good, and the things that he accomplished in a mere 40 years, including the election of  the black POTUS. His actions spoke more about loving one another instead of the action and speeches brought about my the modern day representatives of the black race, who trained in his shadows, who talk with hate and disdain.

Equal opportunity, yes!  Level playing field, no!  To equalize opportunity, one must assure all have the same access to success -- education, mentored how to succeed, and lessening of prejudice,  Leveling the playing field means that those who possess a natural ability must be hobbled.  The great runner forced to run hobbled.  The greater IQ denied an education equal to their reach.  Progressives act like crabs in a bucket. 

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

I'm undecided about school vouchers Kenny. I have seen studies done in favor and against the practice. I will say that one of the biggest local Republican supporters, who also sat on the Florence school board, is 100% against them. 

 

He would be surprised to be lumped in with us Liberals.  

 

 

I have not lived in Florence in nearly 10 years so I do not now who that is. However, I would always remind you to consider the source of an opinion. 

 

"Lifers" in the public education system are mostly going to be against school vouchers regardless of their political party affiliation because they might upset the apple cart. School vouchers will force public education to raise the quality of their product to compete for students in the marketplace. 

 

The current system is obviously not working. We spend more per capita on education than any other country in the world. So it is not a money issue.

Competition is required, especially in school districts where students are failing at a high rate.  Florence is doing well and may forego vouchers or other methods of ensuring students have opportunities for success.  Birmingham, Montgomery and Mobile would be good examples where vouchers or alternative schools would be good measures. 

Originally Posted by teyates:

MLK preached and spoke out for equality.  He wanted it to be fair for everyone. He did not go around falsely accusing white boys of rape, disgracing their names, and causing public humiliation when there was no proof that they were guilty. 

 

Why are you singling out white boys? Do you think no young black men have been wrongly accused of such things? How about other races? Is it some how more upsetting and unfair when its "white boys"?

 

He did not steal money from his organization and set up housekeeping for younger women. 

 

Huh?

 

he did not go on the news programs and call for lynching Hispanic men because they were involved in the shooting of a young black man who was engaged in fighting.

 

Lynching? Really? He would have been right there with the rest of us that wanted to see Zimmer prosecuted for targeting a young man that was not breaking the law, and then killing him when he tried to defend himself against a stranger stalking him through the neighborhood.

 

He really was concerned with equality.  I think MLK would be amazed at how his actions changed the face of the country for good, and the things that he accomplished in a mere 40 years, including the election of  the black POTUS.

 

I think he would be happy with the President. He would be saddened that after 40 years there are still so many that attack the President, for things that other Presidents were never even questioned about. 

I think he would be saddened by the fact that this President is still being called unexperienced after 5 years of leading the most powerful country in the world. Why? That is a question I wish someone would answer for me. 

 

His actions spoke more about loving one another instead of the action and speeches brought about my the modern day representatives of the black race, who trained in his shadows, who talk with hate and disdain. 

 

Has the "black race" named representatives? I think many of them would be surprised to hear that. 

Originally Posted by teyates:

And you are surprised that someone who sits on a school board would be against these vouchers, regardless of what "denomination" they have behind their name?  When are you going to learn that you judge these politicians by their actions, not by the party to which they belong.

_________________

 

 I was actually pointing out the fact that it is not an "elitist liberal" issue. I completely understand that people can't be defined simply by their party affiliation. It went right over your head. 

Originally Posted by Kenny Powers:
Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

I'm undecided about school vouchers Kenny. I have seen studies done in favor and against the practice. I will say that one of the biggest local Republican supporters, who also sat on the Florence school board, is 100% against them. 

 

He would be surprised to be lumped in with us Liberals.  

 

 

I have not lived in Florence in nearly 10 years so I do not now who that is. However, I would always remind you to consider the source of an opinion. 

 

"Lifers" in the public education system are mostly going to be against school vouchers regardless of their political party affiliation because they might upset the apple cart. School vouchers will force public education to raise the quality of their product to compete for students in the marketplace. 

 

The current system is obviously not working. We spend more per capita on education than any other country in the world. So it is not a money issue.

________________

 

He actually does not sit on the board anymore but he is still opposed to vouchers. As I said i am undecided on the issue. I see the pros and cons for both arguments. I also agree that our education problems are not money related. I don't have the answers but I think changes are definitely in order.

This repsonse is so reidulous it does not even bear a repsonse.  When people such as yourslef and Crash puclically chastised GWB for his actions, yet you cannot bear someone talking ill of a man who currently sits in the same position, it is called hypocrisy.  Look it up and get he jest of the meaning.

To my knowledge there is no self appointed leader of the Cracker Clan who stick their noses in race relation issues like Sharpton.  As far as stealing from the organizations, do a little research into the less than legal dealings of the Rev. Jessie a few years ago.

Originally Posted by teyates:

This repsonse is so ridiculous, it does not even bear a response.  When people such as yourseff and Crash pubically chastised GWB for his actions, yet you cannot bear someone talking ill of a man who currently sits in the same position, it is called hypocrisy.  Look it up and get he jest of the meaning.

To my knowledge there is no self appointed leader of the Cracker Clan who stick their noses in race relation issues like Sharpton.  As far as stealing from the organizations, do a little research into the less than legal dealings of the Rev. Jessie a few years ago.

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×