What happened over here?

I think, unfortunately, the forum had descended into more of a running and reoccurring argument and verbal sparing between Bill and a few others.  With Bill being banned, after a while, some of the others just ceased stopping by or left all together and thus just no one seems to keep it active.

All along there really wasn't the use that many would like to have seen.  A real source of dialog and diverse opinions on various topics around Christ or other religions.  Frankly I don't know if it will ever revive it's hay day of activity it had when Bill was in his element and sparing with most everyone.

Now I guess he just uses his Facebook page to slander us as heathen or liberals or whatever false judgements he has to label us with on that particular day but I'd say he does wander by from time to time to sample what's going on and to see if someone resurrects his name.  Ironic that when Bill left some of the others whom seemed to detest him most also left or found  reason to avoid being here anymore.

  There was never a need for a religion forum anyway. A certain person wanted it and pushed for it, and when it was created for ALL to post on, he took it over as his, like a dog with a bone, and growled at, and attacked, everyone he felt shouldn't be posting on the forum. It's no secret a few were here simply to argue with him, and so what? He got worse and worse and some people weren't going to let him use a public forum for his own private "church" using it to exclude and belittle every other church member that didn't share his beliefs, A few others used it for that with him, to attack Catholics and Mormons and non-believers shamelessly. He got too full of himself and over estimated his importance, and was banned. IMO the banning was long overdue, but I don't think people were reporting him as much as they should/could have been. I know I let a lot of things slide with him. He had no problem running and reporting people for the slightest things, even though to their credit, the mods for the most part ignored his reports. I think he did manage to get one really nice guy banned, but I think he had help with that from other Mormon haters. Had he been reported himself when he deserved to be, he'd been long gone.

 

Let's get to the root cause.  Bill ran off everyone who didn't agree with him, or who just found it easier to go elsewhere than to call BS on his nonsense.  They haven't come back to restart the discussion.  Those that have tried were wrongfully attacked as frauds.

 

CrustyMac posted:

Let's get to the root cause.  Bill ran off everyone who didn't agree with him, or who just found it easier to go elsewhere than to call BS on his nonsense.  They haven't come back to restart the discussion.  Those that have tried were wrongfully attacked as frauds.

 

_____

Not quite "everyone," Crusty.  I often disagreed with Bill and he did not run me off.  If I remember correctly, YOU disagreed with him from time to time and though you sort of come and go on this forum, I doubt that your movements can be traced to disagreement with Bill.  Watch out for those absolutes. Leave them to the ultra-absolutist--Bestworking.  She has mastered the dubious craft of absolutism.

absolutist

1.
the principle or the exercise of complete and unrestrictedpower in government.
1 a : a political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulers b : government by an absolute ruler or authority : despotism.
 
 
Hmmmmmmm, sure sounds like you demoslops to me.
Bestworking posted:

I would like to see a "Science" forum.

Jack Flash posted:
I agree Bill was a closed mind and ran a group of good people
away, but my vote for the one who tops him in the hate and
discussion killer of them all is contenduh. Hands down.

As far as this forum is concerned, it was not a "religious" forum at all, and should have died. As for bill being banned, as the saying goes, "cut off the head of the snake and the body will die".

Jack Flash posted:
I agree Bill was a closed mind and ran a group of good people
away, but my vote for the one who tops him in the hate and
discussion killer of them all is contenduh. Hands down.

______

What a LOON you show your warped self to be!  "Discussion killer?"!  Well, Jack, you seem to be very much active in making your childish and inane REPLIES to many topics I initiate or comment upon.  I seem to have done nothing to "kill" your penchant for posting all kinds of drivel in your impotent efforts to counter what I post. Your dubious contributions to this forum are often initiated in response to discussions that I either start or in which I am a major participant.

I just have to conclude that reports of the deaths of discussions at my murderous hand are solely a figment of your perverse imagination.


 

Bestworking posted:

absolutist

1.
the principle or the exercise of complete and unrestrictedpower in government.
1 a : a political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulers b : government by an absolute ruler or authority : despotism.
 
 
Hmmmmmmm, sure sounds like you demoslops to me.
ab·so·lut·ism
[ˈabsəl(y)o͞oˌtizəm]
 

NOUN

  1. the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters.
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries · © Oxford University Press ·
 
Hm-m-m..Sounds like Best to me.
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:

absolutist

1.
the principle or the exercise of complete and unrestrictedpower in government.
1 a : a political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulers b : government by an absolute ruler or authority : despotism.
 
 
Hmmmmmmm, sure sounds like you demoslops to me.
ab·so·lut·ism
[ˈabsəl(y)o͞oˌtizəm]
 

NOUN

  1. the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters.
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries · © Oxford University Press ·
 
Hm-m-m..Sounds like Best to me.

No, still you demoslops.

Contendahh posted:

Not quite "everyone," Crusty.  I often disagreed with Bill and he did not run me off.  If I remember correctly, YOU disagreed with him from time to time and though you sort of come and go on this forum, I doubt that your movements can be traced to disagreement with Bill.  Watch out for those absolutes. Leave them to the ultra-absolutist--Bestworking.  She has mastered the dubious craft of absolutism.

________________

"Everyone" was a bit of an exaggeration.  GBRK is also still trying to have a civil discussion. 

As for Best she has me on block because I disagreed with Bill so much.  Her piping in on every one of your posts far exceeds anything I did.  I wonder why she doesn't just block you, too. 

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Thanks konndie, you nailed what I previously said about you
above, you don't discuss what scares you or what you hate to
see in print. No one here will said "because it's not true, or some
ludicrous babble about what you think is ludicrous.
 
You and your asinine and idiotic Fr. Joe have never proven,
disproved or discussed. So, go inane yourself.
Jack Flash posted:
Thanks konndie, you nailed what I previously said about you
above, you don't discuss what scares you or what you hate to
see in print. No one here will said "because it's not true, or some
ludicrous babble about what you think is ludicrous.
 
You and your asinine and idiotic Fr. Joe have never proven,
disproved or discussed. So, go inane yourself.

___________

Do you actually consider THIS to be in the English language, Jack? Do you actually believe that this drivel makes any sense at all? From your impaired keyboard:

"No one here will said 'because it's not true, or some
ludicrous babble about what you think is ludicrous."

 

CrustyMac posted:
Contendahh posted:

Not quite "everyone," Crusty.  I often disagreed with Bill and he did not run me off.  If I remember correctly, YOU disagreed with him from time to time and though you sort of come and go on this forum, I doubt that your movements can be traced to disagreement with Bill.  Watch out for those absolutes. Leave them to the ultra-absolutist--Bestworking.  She has mastered the dubious craft of absolutism.

________________

"Everyone" was a bit of an exaggeration.  GBRK is also still trying to have a civil discussion. 

As for Best she has me on block because I disagreed with Bill so much.  Her piping in on every one of your posts far exceeds anything I did.  I wonder why she doesn't just block you, too. 

____

She could not long survive on this forum if she blocked me, because making futile little efforts to gig me is her favorite indoor sport.

Jack Flash posted:

And kondopy keeps dancing around a response,

he act a fool.....  

_____

As usual, Jerk, you are clueless. There is nothing in this string that can responsibly be characterized as unresponsiveness on my part. If you disagree, then state your case with some specificity.

Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Why on earth would I bump his threads for his benefit?  Your memory is about as bad as his.

CrustyMac posted:
Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Why on earth would I bump his threads for his benefit?  Your memory is about as bad as his.

_______

Well, I certainly did not agree to Best's proposed cease fire.  To do so would have been to abandon a source of constant amusement provided by the Queen of Dingbat Absolutism!

Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Let's see, you blocked Crusty because he answered Bill, even though "people" had agreed not to reply. First, we'e at a loss as to how that hurt Crusty. Second, does everyone have to agree on something if a few do. I can certainly guess who two of the people were.

Kate Colombo posted:
Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Let's see, you blocked Crusty because he answered Bill, even though "people" had agreed not to reply. First, we'e at a loss as to how that hurt Crusty. Second, does everyone have to agree on something if a few do. I can certainly guess who two of the people were.

____

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

Contendahh posted:
Kate Colombo posted:
Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Let's see, you blocked Crusty because he answered Bill, even though "people" had agreed not to reply. First, we'e at a loss as to how that hurt Crusty. Second, does everyone have to agree on something if a few do. I can certainly guess who two of the people were.

____

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

So said condopy the dancer and king of asterisks.

I think, **** ***, would be a good start. Were you ready..??

Jack Flash posted:
Contendahh posted:
Kate Colombo posted:
Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Let's see, you blocked Crusty because he answered Bill, even though "people" had agreed not to reply. First, we'e at a loss as to how that hurt Crusty. Second, does everyone have to agree on something if a few do. I can certainly guess who two of the people were.

____

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

So said condopy the dancer and king of asterisks.

I think, **** ***, would be a good start. Were you ready..??

___

I think your deranged and incompetent status becomes ever more obvious with each successive load of drivel you post.

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

===================

Just what did I try to organize professor DA? What "guff" did I try to give crusty or anyone else? As you were told, you could use a few asterisks too. I never asked crusty or anyone to do anything. No one can claim that I ever asked them to do a darn thing on this forum. I didn't play those games, and when they attempted to drag me into the middle of it, that karma mess or whatever it was,  that was going on when I joined, and got upset when I wouldn't join the fracas, and started attacking me, I blocked them. I don't go for those childish games.

I myself was asked to please not respond to bill, which was no problem to do, since I had him blocked anyway, and it was posted to ME that crusty seemed to bump bills threads for his (bill's) benefit, and I was asked if  I agreed, and I said it certainly seemed that way. It was one reason I blocked him. I blocked crusty so I really didn't care what he did, and I still don't. What would I be frustrated about professor? Certainly not your imaginary "desertion" of my imaginary "followers", and you sure as heck aren't capable of frustrating or bothering me. I didn't run and report everyone either. No professor, I think it's the other way round, you have become frustrated and even more bitter, and many that have noticed your further descent into madness. I think the truth of the matter is YOU are the one that lost all your support and "control", and people and especially I, don't take any guff from you. You don't like being "slapped" by an uppity woman. People are just tired of your condescending and priggish ***.

She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum

==================

No idea who the "guff takers" are/were, but the "crow eater" is still here, and still eating the crow I feed him! Maybe that's why HE is so upset lately.

Contendahh posted:
Jack Flash posted:
Contendahh posted:
Kate Colombo posted:
Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Let's see, you blocked Crusty because he answered Bill, even though "people" had agreed not to reply. First, we'e at a loss as to how that hurt Crusty. Second, does everyone have to agree on something if a few do. I can certainly guess who two of the people were.

____

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

So said condopy the dancer and king of asterisks.

I think, **** ***, would be a good start. Were you ready..??

___

I think your deranged and incompetent status becomes ever more obvious with each successive load of drivel you post.

I think you like me condie....

Bestworking posted:

She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum

==================

No idea who the "guff takers" are/were, but the "crow eater" is still here, and still eating the crow I feed him! Maybe that's why HE is so upset lately.

Bestworking posted:

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

===================

Just what did I try to organize professor DA? What "guff" did I try to give crusty or anyone else? As you were told, you could use a few asterisks too. I never asked crusty or anyone to do anything. No one can claim that I ever asked them to do a darn thing on this forum. I didn't play those games, and when they attempted to drag me into the middle of it, that karma mess or whatever it was,  that was going on when I joined, and got upset when I wouldn't join the fracas, and started attacking me, I blocked them. I don't go for those childish games.

I myself was asked to please not respond to bill, which was no problem to do, since I had him blocked anyway, and it was posted to ME that crusty seemed to bump bills threads for his (bill's) benefit, and I was asked if  I agreed, and I said it certainly seemed that way. It was one reason I blocked him. I blocked crusty so I really didn't care what he did, and I still don't. What would I be frustrated about professor? Certainly not your imaginary "desertion" of my imaginary "followers", and you sure as heck aren't capable of frustrating or bothering me. I didn't run and report everyone either. No professor, I think it's the other way round, you have become frustrated and even more bitter, and many that have noticed your further descent into madness. I think the truth of the matter is YOU are the one that lost all your support and "control", and people and especially I, don't take any guff from you. You don't like being "slapped" by an uppity woman. People are just tired of your condescending and priggish ***.

___

Any attempted "slap" by you was too feathery light even to be noticed, Best.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bestworking posted:

She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum

==================

No idea who the "guff takers" are/were, but the "crow eater" is still here, and still eating the crow I feed him! Maybe that's why HE is so upset lately.

_____

I don't mind being the object of your fantasies, Best, because they are so flagrantly false and self-serving on their face. But for my convenience, would you lease consider posting only one feeble reply at a time instead of two replies in swift succession to the same post?  Assuming, of course, that your thought processes are capable of handling any such  degree of difficulty.

Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:

She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum

==================

No idea who the "guff takers" are/were, but the "crow eater" is still here, and still eating the crow I feed him! Maybe that's why HE is so upset lately.

Bestworking posted:

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

===================

Just what did I try to organize professor DA? What "guff" did I try to give crusty or anyone else? As you were told, you could use a few asterisks too. I never asked crusty or anyone to do anything. No one can claim that I ever asked them to do a darn thing on this forum. I didn't play those games, and when they attempted to drag me into the middle of it, that karma mess or whatever it was,  that was going on when I joined, and got upset when I wouldn't join the fracas, and started attacking me, I blocked them. I don't go for those childish games.

I myself was asked to please not respond to bill, which was no problem to do, since I had him blocked anyway, and it was posted to ME that crusty seemed to bump bills threads for his (bill's) benefit, and I was asked if  I agreed, and I said it certainly seemed that way. It was one reason I blocked him. I blocked crusty so I really didn't care what he did, and I still don't. What would I be frustrated about professor? Certainly not your imaginary "desertion" of my imaginary "followers", and you sure as heck aren't capable of frustrating or bothering me. I didn't run and report everyone either. No professor, I think it's the other way round, you have become frustrated and even more bitter, and many that have noticed your further descent into madness. I think the truth of the matter is YOU are the one that lost all your support and "control", and people and especially I, don't take any guff from you. You don't like being "slapped" by an uppity woman. People are just tired of your condescending and priggish ***.

___

Any attempted "slap" by you was too feathery light even to be noticed, Best.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear lord!  What happened over here?

Pardon this script . . . I can't find the beginning.

What just happen here?

Seriously, Condendahh, do you ever proofread a dam thing you write?

For someone who professes to be smart and athletically inclined, Bo you sure are one lazy dude.

 

Jack Flash posted:
Contendahh posted:
Jack Flash posted:
Contendahh posted:
Kate Colombo posted:
Bestworking posted:

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Let's see, you blocked Crusty because he answered Bill, even though "people" had agreed not to reply. First, we'e at a loss as to how that hurt Crusty. Second, does everyone have to agree on something if a few do. I can certainly guess who two of the people were.

____

Best, the control freak, came unglued when she was unable to organize others on the forum because they chose not to follow her lead on responding or "bumping ." You probably know Crusty well enough to know that he takes no guff from Best.  She prefers the guff takers and is obviously frustrated by the absence of them on this forum.  Her frustration lately has resulted in certain stylistic changes in composition, most notably her prolific use of asterisks as surrogates for filthy epithets. It is indeed a sad and sorry decline and one that seems to find ever steeper slopes.  Now get ready for some more asterisks.

So said condopy the dancer and king of asterisks.

I think, **** ***, would be a good start. Were you ready..??

___

I think your deranged and incompetent status becomes ever more obvious with each successive load of drivel you post.

I think you like me condie....

He can't live without us.

Any attempted "slap" by you was too feathery light even to be noticed, Best.

========================

That's why you whine, lie and start threads about me, and won't block me, instead running to my threads and posts to make your snarky replies. Then you act all insulted/surprised by what you get back. 

Bestworking posted:

Any attempted "slap" by you was too feathery light even to be noticed, Best.

========================

That's why you whine, lie and start threads about me, and won't block me, instead running to my threads and posts to make your snarky replies. Then you act all insulted/surprised by what you get back. 

_______

I don't block anyone and never have.  I am not so tenderly sensitive as to have my feelings hurt by the likes of absolutist you, and besides, your arrogant misplaced self-confidence is good for a lot of laughs. To you, my disagreement with your narrow, truncated ideology is whining by your perverted definition of the term.  I don't buy that nuttiness.

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×