Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think, unfortunately, the forum had descended into more of a running and reoccurring argument and verbal sparing between Bill and a few others.  With Bill being banned, after a while, some of the others just ceased stopping by or left all together and thus just no one seems to keep it active.

All along there really wasn't the use that many would like to have seen.  A real source of dialog and diverse opinions on various topics around Christ or other religions.  Frankly I don't know if it will ever revive it's hay day of activity it had when Bill was in his element and sparing with most everyone.

Now I guess he just uses his Facebook page to slander us as heathen or liberals or whatever false judgements he has to label us with on that particular day but I'd say he does wander by from time to time to sample what's going on and to see if someone resurrects his name.  Ironic that when Bill left some of the others whom seemed to detest him most also left or found  reason to avoid being here anymore.

  There was never a need for a religion forum anyway. A certain person wanted it and pushed for it, and when it was created for ALL to post on, he took it over as his, like a dog with a bone, and growled at, and attacked, everyone he felt shouldn't be posting on the forum. It's no secret a few were here simply to argue with him, and so what? He got worse and worse and some people weren't going to let him use a public forum for his own private "church" using it to exclude and belittle every other church member that didn't share his beliefs, A few others used it for that with him, to attack Catholics and Mormons and non-believers shamelessly. He got too full of himself and over estimated his importance, and was banned. IMO the banning was long overdue, but I don't think people were reporting him as much as they should/could have been. I know I let a lot of things slide with him. He had no problem running and reporting people for the slightest things, even though to their credit, the mods for the most part ignored his reports. I think he did manage to get one really nice guy banned, but I think he had help with that from other Mormon haters. Had he been reported himself when he deserved to be, he'd been long gone.

 

Last edited by Bestworking
CrustyMac posted:

Let's get to the root cause.  Bill ran off everyone who didn't agree with him, or who just found it easier to go elsewhere than to call BS on his nonsense.  They haven't come back to restart the discussion.  Those that have tried were wrongfully attacked as frauds.

 

_____

Not quite "everyone," Crusty.  I often disagreed with Bill and he did not run me off.  If I remember correctly, YOU disagreed with him from time to time and though you sort of come and go on this forum, I doubt that your movements can be traced to disagreement with Bill.  Watch out for those absolutes. Leave them to the ultra-absolutist--Bestworking.  She has mastered the dubious craft of absolutism.

Bestworking posted:

I would like to see a "Science" forum.

Jack Flash posted:
I agree Bill was a closed mind and ran a group of good people
away, but my vote for the one who tops him in the hate and
discussion killer of them all is contenduh. Hands down.

As far as this forum is concerned, it was not a "religious" forum at all, and should have died. As for bill being banned, as the saying goes, "cut off the head of the snake and the body will die".

Jack Flash posted:
I agree Bill was a closed mind and ran a group of good people
away, but my vote for the one who tops him in the hate and
discussion killer of them all is contenduh. Hands down.

______

What a LOON you show your warped self to be!  "Discussion killer?"!  Well, Jack, you seem to be very much active in making your childish and inane REPLIES to many topics I initiate or comment upon.  I seem to have done nothing to "kill" your penchant for posting all kinds of drivel in your impotent efforts to counter what I post. Your dubious contributions to this forum are often initiated in response to discussions that I either start or in which I am a major participant.

I just have to conclude that reports of the deaths of discussions at my murderous hand are solely a figment of your perverse imagination.


 

Bestworking posted:

absolutist

1.
the principle or the exercise of complete and unrestrictedpower in government.
1 a : a political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulers b : government by an absolute ruler or authority : despotism.
 
 
Hmmmmmmm, sure sounds like you demoslops to me.
ab·so·lut·ism
[ˈabsəl(y)o͞oˌtizəm]
 

NOUN

  1. the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters.
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries · © Oxford University Press ·
 
Hm-m-m..Sounds like Best to me.
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:

absolutist

1.
the principle or the exercise of complete and unrestrictedpower in government.
1 a : a political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulers b : government by an absolute ruler or authority : despotism.
 
 
Hmmmmmmm, sure sounds like you demoslops to me.
ab·so·lut·ism
[ˈabsəl(y)o͞oˌtizəm]
 

NOUN

  1. the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters.
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries · © Oxford University Press ·
 
Hm-m-m..Sounds like Best to me.

No, still you demoslops.

Contendahh posted:

Not quite "everyone," Crusty.  I often disagreed with Bill and he did not run me off.  If I remember correctly, YOU disagreed with him from time to time and though you sort of come and go on this forum, I doubt that your movements can be traced to disagreement with Bill.  Watch out for those absolutes. Leave them to the ultra-absolutist--Bestworking.  She has mastered the dubious craft of absolutism.

________________

"Everyone" was a bit of an exaggeration.  GBRK is also still trying to have a civil discussion. 

As for Best she has me on block because I disagreed with Bill so much.  Her piping in on every one of your posts far exceeds anything I did.  I wonder why she doesn't just block you, too. 

Yes crusty, I blocked you because you ran in and bumped every thread bill made, even when you saw no one was responding to the thread, or knew people had agreed not to respond. I'm not the only one that thought you were bumping his threads for his benefit. Now go through the threads and see how many of beternnuns I have actually responded to as opposed to him having something to say on my threads, or in reply when I post on someone else's thread, or the threads he makes about me. I told him a long time ago that I would stop responding to him if he stopped responding to me, but he can't do that, just like you wouldn't block bill, for whatever reason you had. Now you can go on block again and suck up to beternnun in private.

Last edited by Bestworking
Thanks konndie, you nailed what I previously said about you
above, you don't discuss what scares you or what you hate to
see in print. No one here will said "because it's not true, or some
ludicrous babble about what you think is ludicrous.
 
You and your asinine and idiotic Fr. Joe have never proven,
disproved or discussed. So, go inane yourself.
Jack Flash posted:
Thanks konndie, you nailed what I previously said about you
above, you don't discuss what scares you or what you hate to
see in print. No one here will said "because it's not true, or some
ludicrous babble about what you think is ludicrous.
 
You and your asinine and idiotic Fr. Joe have never proven,
disproved or discussed. So, go inane yourself.

___________

Do you actually consider THIS to be in the English language, Jack? Do you actually believe that this drivel makes any sense at all? From your impaired keyboard:

"No one here will said 'because it's not true, or some
ludicrous babble about what you think is ludicrous."

 

CrustyMac posted:
Contendahh posted:

Not quite "everyone," Crusty.  I often disagreed with Bill and he did not run me off.  If I remember correctly, YOU disagreed with him from time to time and though you sort of come and go on this forum, I doubt that your movements can be traced to disagreement with Bill.  Watch out for those absolutes. Leave them to the ultra-absolutist--Bestworking.  She has mastered the dubious craft of absolutism.

________________

"Everyone" was a bit of an exaggeration.  GBRK is also still trying to have a civil discussion. 

As for Best she has me on block because I disagreed with Bill so much.  Her piping in on every one of your posts far exceeds anything I did.  I wonder why she doesn't just block you, too. 

____

She could not long survive on this forum if she blocked me, because making futile little efforts to gig me is her favorite indoor sport.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×