quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Look who will be moving in big-time:
http://www.time.com/time/world...id=newsletter-weeklyEverybody's favorite Shiite! Heah come de ayatollah! A big buddy of Iran powerfully poised to become a big player in the Iraqi government!
What have the neocons wrought?
Would you prefer Saddam still in charge? Only an idiot would not think Iran would try to move in. Who is the lame brain who keeps posting our date of withdrawal?
I thought the libs were against us talking charge. It was not a 'nation building or an occupation' remember?
What do you want bitter?
Actually YES, I would prefer for Saddam to be in charge and bottled up like he was.
The world was better off.
My personal problems with the Bush crime family and especially GHW does not deflect the fact that he (GHW) was right about Iraq becoming a power vacuum if Saddam were to be taken out.
W should have consulted his father on this matter. GHW may have been a sorry individual, but he was at least smart. The dumb one screwed up Iraq and may well have screwed up the world for some time to come.
There is NO statute of limitations on who to blame for this mess in Iraq and by extension Iran. Iran was trying to become allies with the US when W declared them in the "axis of evil".
Now look where all that has left us.
It may take another generation to straighten out what W messed up, if it ever does.