Why is there no media outrage about affecting American elections?

Oh, wait there is outrage over the thought that MAYBE the Russians or someone had some minuscule effect on the election that might have caused Hillary to be defeated by Donald Trump.  The Democrats have such a hard time admitting that she was such a horrible candidate that if anyone could actually lose to Donald Trump it would be her.   All this talk and investigations going on after the election trying to find some Russian collusion or trying to find someone who might have helped Donald Trump but NOTHING about George Soros attempts to swing elections for the Democrats?   Why is that?

George Soros aims to swing elections

I guess it's not a problem, for the liberals and Democrats and media, when someone affects an election as long as it benefits their political position or party.

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )
Original Post

With the Republicans screaming about voter fraud at every turn, why are Republicans unwilling to address the Russian interference? And the Koch brothers spend hundreds of millions of dollars to influence elections and Republicans have said/ done nothing. Why  whine about Soros and say nothing about Republican backers? This would be the definition of hypocrisy.

I wonder why the Koch lizards worked against Trump the whole time.

Going on how long now, the investigation of Russian meddling in the
elections, it couldn't have been more said or actions taken against
it than it was and still going on with full cooperation from Trump and

all the Kings men.

The only evidence it's shown is the corruption of the entire Clinton
weekly comedy hour, including corrupt FBI, outsiders, UK spies,
the hate of the media in general, Congress/Rinos, the west coast,
illegal treasonous tampering of the previous administration and
a unquestionable bias special council filled with Trump haters only.. 

  

Kraven posted:

I wonder why the Koch lizards worked against Trump the whole time.

Going on how long now, the investigation of Russian meddling in the
elections, it couldn't have been more said or actions taken against
it than it was and still going on with full cooperation from Trump and

all the Kings men.

The only evidence it's shown is the corruption of the entire Clinton
weekly comedy hour, including corrupt FBI, outsiders, UK spies,
the hate of the media in general, Congress/Rinos, the west coast,
illegal treasonous tampering of the previous administration and
a unquestionable bias special council filled with Trump haters only.. 

  

Lets break this down... Trump stops sanctions against Russia, after a veto proof majority of Congress approves them. Trump does everything he can do to stop any sanctions against Russia.

Everyone is wrong about Trump, including, but not limited to...
The Clintons, Obama, the FBI, Congress, other Republicans, Obama's Administration, the UK, the UK intelligence community, the Media, Special Council.......

In other words, the world is wrong, but the Alt. Right is correct. That about sums it all up.

Laughable!   There has been 100% bipartisan support for the Russian collusion investigation from day one.  Jeff Sessions has secluded himself from anything to do with the Russian investigation, something I don't remember ANY OBAMA Democratic administration official doing anytime.  Republicans have gone on record not only advising the President not to stop the investigation but have all but assured he may be impeached if he did even though after all this time NOTHING has been discovered or found to indicate anything connected with it is true.  

The ONLY thing that has been proven is that the dossier that was responsible for the whole accusation was a creation and a creation that was paid for by the Hillary Campaign in an attempt to sway the election.  Another fact is that Trump has been more adversarial toward Russia than most any modern American President.  Was it not Obama that was caught, overheard, on a hot mic telling the Russians that he would have far more latitude to work with them once the election (of 2012) was over?  Wasn't it Hillary who was responsible for allowing the Russians to gain access to our Uranium?   Yet it's Trump who is in collusion with them?  Come on now given all that Muller has failed to come up with while spending tons of money attempting to find something that obviously isn't there it stretches the limits of credibility to actually try and make a case that it's Trump that is in collusion with the Russians in a negative way.

What Trump has done was express that IF POSSIBLE it would be prudent to maintain a friendly and beneficial relationship with Russia (and China) for the benefit of the American people rather than an adversarial one, however, Trump has never wavered to oppose them or confront them if the need presented itself even to the point of firing off attacks against (Russian backed) Syrian military locations.  Again to try and say Trump is in bed with Putin is Laughable and strains your credibility.  

Also, no one is trying to say Trump is above reproach, for he isn't.  Trump, however, has been doing a stellar job (my own opinion) and far excels above anything that Obama ever did.  Whereas Obama had everyone laughing at us and apologized, and blamed America, for all the world's ills, Trump has done nothing but attempt to restore America to Superpower status and bring America back into the area of Greatness in all categories and areas.  Where Obama made horrible deals and installed choking regulations in attempts to kill American industries such as oil and coal Trump has eliminated those regulations and canceled deals that were not beneficial to America and our economy.  Trump has certainly made some horrible personal decisions (before the election) that will affect him for years, and affect his family, but he hasn't been guilty of doing anything (like Nixon, Clinton or Kennedy) while in office to soil the office name.  

You can condemn Trump and continue to accuse him of something no evidence can be found of.  People accuse him of being some kind of dufus yet somehow he's able to evade the Russian collusion evidence and escape Scott free.  I think the better chances are that there was never any Russian collusion but rather it was some fabricated dream of the Democrats to somehow try and invalidate a legitimate election and at the same time find some scapegoat to explain why the most horrible and terrible candidate ever lost to someone like Donald Trump.  

Trump is a businessman first with years of political savvy and a
international awareness in business dealing. He doesn't want to
alienate any country he should be dealing with on a peaceful
basic.   
Left alone he's very successful in or outside the Whitehouse,
let trump be Trump.

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×