Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Harald Weissberg:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Harald Weissberg:

Getting desperate or senile?

Or both?

_______________________________________________________
The last few months, his posts have gotten stranger and stranger. 

 ____

What is not strange at all, but transparent as the finest glass, is your obvious failure to address the actual argument I have submitted above.  You elect instead, with your similarly disordered and similarly desperate colleague in evasion, Harald, to degrade the discourse with cheap and irrelevant ad hominem insult.  How very small and shameful of both of you.

 

 

Just an observation, based on the subject, and the Party affiliation.

Surely you should investigate the gross expenditures of "Queen Mo" on the taxpayers dime.

___

The deranged anti-Michelle wackadoodles have committed more than sufficient resources in their 

frantic investigations and ongoing unchivalrous assaults against her.  If they should find anything illegal in what she is doing as First Lady, I am sure they will serve it up, but thus far all they have done is b****, b****, and b****.

Last edited by Contendahh
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Condie is calling out someone for a mote, while ignoring the beam in his own eye.

___

Your "logic" appears to be the misbegotten notion that so long as some greater offense can be discovered and described, a lesser offense is not truly relevant. By that "logic," examination of all  the evils of the world could progressively dismiss all offenses except the very most egregious

___________________________________________________
I have yet so see any offense from your thread. Merely, information printed in the TD, which apparently worked you into a state.  

 ____

 

Your "logic" appears to be the misbegotten notion that so long as some greater offense can be discovered and described, a lesser offense is not truly relevant. By that "logic," examination of all  the evils of the world could progressively dismiss all offenses except the very most egregious.

_____________________________________________________________

Once more, I have yet to see anything illegal.  A lobbyist made relatively small donations in the form of travel expenses to a politician. 

 

 

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Again, why is your nose stuck in Alabama's business? 

------------------

Best, with the exception of housing, I bet I spend more money in Alabama than you do.

________________________________________________
JT, clean up Memphis, then get back to us.  Personally, I see the only way to do that task involves rerouting the Mississippi thru the place.

 

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Again, why is your nose stuck in Alabama's business? 

------------------

Best, with the exception of housing, I bet I spend more money in Alabama than you do.

==================

Another idiot comment from jt the clueless, and something only someone that has everything paid for them, and doesn't have a clue what it takes to live anywhere, would say. Spending a few bucks here is still no reason for your nose to be stuck in OUR business. I go to TN quite a bit, and I spend money there, but you don't see me trying to tell them how to run their state. So, are you ever going to answer the question of what they got for their 60 grand spent over 7 years?

 

Last edited by Bestworking

Another idiot comment from jt the clueless, and something only someone that has everything paid for them, and doesn't have a clue what it takes to live anywhere, would say. 

---------------------

Where did that lie come from? Would you like for me to send you some of my bills so you could pay them and cause that statement to have some truth?

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Another idiot comment from jt the clueless, and something only someone that has everything paid for them, and doesn't have a clue what it takes to live anywhere, would say. 

---------------------

Where did that lie come from? Would you like for me to send you some of my bills so you could pay them and cause that statement to have some truth?

____

That little defamatory description by Worst is typical of the purulent, un-provable speculation that   she gratuituousy and ignorantly gins up. Such trashy ad hominem bilge  arises from the fetid, purulent and determinedly asinine imagination of Best.  Her despicable forte is ginning up contemptible, imaginary and degrading lies about persons she dislikes on this forum and it matters not that she has no possible way of knowing the things she barfs up.  

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×