Skip to main content

Paul Craig Roberts: The Empire Turns Its Guns on the Citizenry

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts01242007.html

January 24, 2007


Your Local Police Force Has Been Militarized

The Empire Turns Its Guns on the Citizenry



By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

In recent years American police forces have called out SWAT teams 40,000 or more times annually. Last year did you read in your newspaper or hear on TV news of 110 hostage or terrorist events each day? No. What then were the SWAT teams doing? They were serving routine warrants to people who posed no danger to the police or to the public.

Occasionally Washington think tanks produce reports that are not special pleading for donors. One such report is Radley Balko's "Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Police Raids in America" (Cato Institute, 2006).

This 100-page report is extremely important and should have been published as a book. SWAT teams (Special Weapons and Tactics) were once rare and used only for very dangerous situations, often involving hostages held by armed criminals. Today SWAT teams are deployed for routine police duties. In the US today, 75-80% of SWAT deployments are for warrant service.

In a high percentage of the cases, the SWAT teams forcefully enter the wrong address, resulting in death, injury, and trauma to perfectly innocent people. Occasionally, highly keyed-up police kill one another in the confusion caused by their stun grenades.

Mr. Balko reports that the use of paramilitary police units began in Los Angeles in the 1960s. The militarization of local police forces got a big boost from Attorney General Ed Meese's "war on drugs" during the Reagan administration. A National Security Decision Directive was issued that declared drugs to be a threat to US national security. In 1988 Congress ordered the National Guard into the domestic drug war. In 1994 the Department of Defense issued a memorandum authorizing the transfer of military equipment and technology to state and local police, and Congress created a program "to facilitate handing military gear over to civilian police agencies."

Today 17,000 local police forces are equipped with such military equipment as Blackhawk helicopters, machine guns, grenade launchers, battering rams, explosives, chemical sprays, body armor, night vision, rappelling gear and armored vehicles. Some have tanks. In 1999, the New York Times reported that a retired police chief in New Haven, Connecticut, told the newspaper, "I was offered tanks, bazookas, anything I wanted." Balklo reports that in 1997, for example, police departments received 1.2 million pieces of military equipment.

With local police forces now armed beyond the standard of US heavy infantry, police forces have been retrained "to vaporize, not Mirandize," to use a phrase from Reagan administration defense official Lawrence Korb. This leaves the public at the mercy of brutal actions based on bad police information from paid informers.

SWAT team deployments received a huge boost from the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant program, which gave states federal money for drug enforcement. Balko explains that "the states then disbursed the money to local police departments on the basis of each department's number of drug arrests."

With financial incentives to maximize drug arrests and with idle SWAT teams due to a paucity of hostage or other dangerous situations, local police chiefs threw their SWAT teams into drug enforcement. In practice, this has meant using SWAT teams to serve warrants on drug users.

SWAT teams serve warrants by breaking into homes and apartments at night while people are sleeping, often using stun grenades and other devices to disorient the occupants. As much of the police's drug information comes from professional informers known as "snitches" who tip off police for cash rewards, dropped charges, and reduced sentences, names and addresses are often pulled out of a hat. Balko provides details for 135 tragic cases of mistaken addresses.

SWAT teams are not held accountable for their tragic mistakes and gratuitous brutality. Police killings got so bad in Albuquerque, New Mexico, for example, that the city hired criminologist Sam Walker to conduct an investigation of police tactics. Killings by police were "off the charts," Walker found, because the SWAT team "had an organizational culture that led them to escalate situations upward rather then de-escalating."

The mind-set of militarized SWAT teams is geared to "taking out" or killing the suspect-- thus, the many deaths from SWAT team utilization. Many innocent people are killed in night time SWAT team entries, because they don't realize that it is the police who have broken into their homes. They believe they are confronted by dangerous criminals, and when they try to defend themselves they are shot down by the police.

As Lawrence Stratton and I have reported, one of many corrupting influences on the criminal justice (sic) system is the practice of paying "snitches" to generate suspects. In 1995 the Boston Globe profiled people who lived entirely off the fees that they were paid as police informants. Snitches create suspects by selling a small amount of marijuana to a person who they then report to the police as being in possession of drugs. Balko reports that "an overwhelming number of mistaken raids take place because police relied on information from confidential informants." In Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, 87% of drug raids originated in tips from snitches.

Many police informers are themselves drug dealers who avoid arrest and knock off competitors by serving as police snitches.

Surveying the deplorable situation, the National Law Journal concluded: "Criminals have been turned into instruments of law enforcement, while law enforcement officers have become criminal co-conspirators."

Balko believes the problem could be reduced if judges scrutinized unreliable information before issuing warrants. If judges would actually do their jobs, there would be fewer innocent victims of SWAT brutality. However, as long as the war on drugs persists and as long as it produces financial rewards to police departments, local police forces, saturated with military weapons and war imagery, will continue to terrorize American citizens.


Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
If judges would actually do their jobs


This is the only statement in this radical's article that I can agree with.

You would have to be a total idiot to believe that this is a real problem!
Half the statements in this article have no supporting data or uses exaggerations ("high percentage" then says 135 cases).

I see nothing has changed on this forum while I've been away.
IMHO, my sentiments exactly.

Judges should be held accountable for THEIR actions if they authorize a warrant that obviously has bad info on it.

Body Armor was first developed for Law Enforcement...the military got it from the cops, not the other way around.

Rapelling gear was first developed by mountain climbers....the military and law enforcement got it from them.

Armored vehicles are defensive tools, not offensive. A armored vehicle means it is bullet resistant, not that it is "armed" with any special (or usually any) weapons.

Although tear gas was a military development, Pepper spray was an animal control agent that was watered down for Law Enforcement use.

Lawrence Korb was NOT speaking of Law Enforcement when he made his "to vaporize, not Mirandize" statement....he was speaking about the military.

quote:
Today 17,000 local police forces are equipped with such military equipment as Blackhawk helicopters, machine guns, grenade launchers, battering rams, explosives, chemical sprays, body armor, night vision, rappelling gear and armored vehicles.


Now cut the words "local police forces" out of this quote, and insert "drug manufacturers and dealers"...it's more accurate that way than before.

Where's Mr. Robert's outrage at "drug deals gone wrong" where innocent women and children are shot and killed by money hungry meth and crack dealers, or gang members fighting over "turf"?

If he can't quote names, cases, dates, times and numbers, he's just stirring fire up with nothing in the pot to cook. He's are making a lot of smoke for no good reason, and I find the whole article repulsive, full of mistruths, outright lies and unbelievable.
quote:
Originally posted by imho:
quote:
If judges would actually do their jobs


This is the only statement in this radical's article that I can agree with.

You would have to be a total idiot to believe that this is a real problem!
Half the statements in this article have no supporting data or uses exaggerations ("high percentage" then says 135 cases).

I see nothing has changed on this forum while I've been away.


All you would have to do to consider this a real problem is FORGET TO PAY A PARKING TICKET.
In my PERSONAL OPINION, the author of this article is nothing short of a total idiot. Routine warrant? OK, for the benefit of doubt that I may be wrong, can/will someone give me an example of a routine warrant?

I’ve never hear of a routine warrant. I thought all warrants were classified as either a misdemeanor or felony warrant. The establish procedure of the serving the warrant is based on the severity of the offence, alleged offender’s personal criminal history, current knowledge of the alleged offenders use of drugs/alcohol, previous violent encounters with law enforcement, and an endless list of other factors with the final determination being department policy and supervisory/administrative review.

I just don’t know of any officer/agency who can and will pick up a telephone and call a SWAT, SRT, SPECIAL OP’s or what ever you choose to call you team because someone doesn’t like someone else or an officer has a grudge against someone.

As for what’s considered ROUTINE in law enforcement, look at the number of our fallen officers who were murdered because of a ROUTINE traffic stop. How many of our officers have been assaulted and/or killed because of a ROUTINE alarm call, suspicious person and/or host of other ROUTINE calls? There is nothing ROUTINE about law enforcement and any good officer who tells you that it is has very increased odds of having a short career and/or life.
This guy mentions things that don't exist. He claims SWAT teams are "armed beyond the standard of US heavy infantry". There is no such classification in the US Army. It may just be semantics, but the US Army has Light, Mech, Motorized, Airborne, etc. Infantry, no Heavy anymore. If you publis an article, get your terms right. Plus, if he is refering to Mech, I've never seen a police force with Bradleys.

Hey Brenteman, were you an infantry soldier in the 3rd ID, or one of those armor pukes (no offense)?
All that and then add in the no threat statement and think about the Athens officers who responded to a call by a nutjob and then were killed by said nutjub. A SWAT team would have been armored and possibly alive today. I wish PBA would just come up with his own material instead of just copy pasted whacko articles everyday
quote:
Originally posted by alacharger:
IMHO, my sentiments exactly.

Judges should be held accountable for THEIR actions if they authorize a warrant that obviously has bad info on it.

Body Armor was first developed for Law Enforcement...the military got it from the cops, not the other way around.

Rapelling gear was first developed by mountain climbers....the military and law enforcement got it from them.

Armored vehicles are defensive tools, not offensive. A armored vehicle means it is bullet resistant, not that it is "armed" with any special (or usually any) weapons.

Although tear gas was a military development, Pepper spray was an animal control agent that was watered down for Law Enforcement use.

Lawrence Korb was NOT speaking of Law Enforcement when he made his "to vaporize, not Mirandize" statement....he was speaking about the military.

quote:
Today 17,000 local police forces are equipped with such military equipment as Blackhawk helicopters, machine guns, grenade launchers, battering rams, explosives, chemical sprays, body armor, night vision, rappelling gear and armored vehicles.


Now cut the words "local police forces" out of this quote, and insert "drug manufacturers and dealers"...it's more accurate that way than before.

Where's Mr. Robert's outrage at "drug deals gone wrong" where innocent women and children are shot and killed by money hungry meth and crack dealers, or gang members fighting over "turf"?

If he can't quote names, cases, dates, times and numbers, he's just stirring fire up with nothing in the pot to cook. He's are making a lot of smoke for no good reason, and I find the whole article repulsive, full of mistruths, outright lies and unbelievable.


VERY well said alacharger!!!
It is refreshing to see there are so many people on this forum who have enough common sense to extinguish the crap that comes from this fictitious and highly opinionated article spewed about the evils of the police who make less money than most and risk their lives to protect us.

This article is so out of touch that it attempts to make its readers believe the police are planning some type of military coup.
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:
Originally posted by imho:
quote:
If judges would actually do their jobs


This is the only statement in this radical's article that I can agree with.

You would have to be a total idiot to believe that this is a real problem!
Half the statements in this article have no supporting data or uses exaggerations ("high percentage" then says 135 cases).

I see nothing has changed on this forum while I've been away.


All you would have to do to consider this a real problem is FORGET TO PAY A PARKING TICKET.


1) I wouldn't get a parking ticket.
2) IF I did and deserved it I would pay it.
quote:
Originally posted by Alphonse:
This guy mentions things that don't exist. He claims SWAT teams are "armed beyond the standard of US heavy infantry". There is no such classification in the US Army. It may just be semantics, but the US Army has Light, Mech, Motorized, Airborne, etc. Infantry, no Heavy anymore. If you publis an article, get your terms right. Plus, if he is refering to Mech, I've never seen a police force with Bradleys.

Hey Brenteman, were you an infantry soldier in the 3rd ID, or one of those armor pukes (no offense)?


Yes, I was in the Marne Division and I wear my Dog-Face Soldier patch on my right shoulder...."I wouldn't give a bean to be a fancy pants Marine..."

No, I was not a tread-head. I am in the Artillery, a 13A at that, a Cannon-****er. Remember: the Army song was the Caisson song LONG before it became the Army song.....

Next, the U.S. Army currently has the following types of combat units (I am not including SOCOM units, i.e. Special Forces):

Mechanized Infantry (Bradleys, Tanks, etc. That would be considered heavy infantry). 3ID, 1st ID, etc.

Light Infantry, soldiers walk or air assult via helicopter in. They have no tracked vehicles. They do have trucks, HMMWV's, etc. 101st Air Assault, 10th Mountain, etc.

Airborne Infantry: same as light infantry, but arrive via parachute. Only one: 82nd Airborne division. 173 Airborne is a brigade in Italy.

Sryker: use the Stryker series of LAV vehicles to move around. These are in Brigade Combat Team (BCT) organization.

Armor: have lots of tanks that outnumber mechanized infantry: 1st AD, 1st Cavary Divsion, etc.

Now, the Army is transitioning from a Division focus to a Brigade Combat Team focus. The following are the types of BCT's in the Army doctrine for transformation: Heavy BCT, Light BCT, Airborne BCT, Stryker BCT. Heavy BCT means mechanized infantry or armor focus. The other three are self explainitory.

What this means is you might have a Division element with a mix of light and heavy and Stryker focus. Example: 25th Infantry Division- Division HQ at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii. 1 light BCT and 1 Stryker BCT in Hawaii; 1 Airborne BCT at Fort Richardson, AK; 1 Stryker BCT at Fort Wainwright, AK.

Another example: 1st ID with Division HQ at Fort Riley, KS. 2 heavy BCT's at Fort Riley; 1 Stryker BCT at FT Knox, KY; and 1 Light BCT at Fort Knox, KY (these two are ramping up as we speak).

Times are changing in the Army, folks. Think Brigade Combat Team focus, not Divsion focus. All those patches are now is a link to the historical past......

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×