Replies sorted oldest to newest
The kids are just trying to "drain the swamp"...
Interesting question, but this particular forum is for feedback from the TD. So many people have misused it that they never even bother to read or answer any more. You'd get a better response in news or misc.
Dr. Pepper posted:
Children that bully other children telling us what to do. The bald chick was one of Cruz's bullies.
giftedamateur posted:Dr. Pepper posted:Children that bully other children telling us what to do. The bald chick was one of Cruz's bullies.
The "bald chick" Emma is younger than that punk cruz. Are you intimidated by these kids?
I am not intimidated the those kids. I am concerned with those pulling the puppet strings. We watched the pied piper of Obama. The power hungry Clinton.
We watch a polite, quiet Bush be slammed. A patriot run and be brought down. A well mannered Romney be destroyed. Now we have a president that stands up to the national bullies be attacked. The democrats aren't for our country, they are destroying the Republican party. They are for a global government not the USA. While the NRA is attacked, Soros and the NEA and other unions is ok? Personally I believe it an organization is tax exempt they shouldn't be allowed in politics.
Naio posted:The kids are just trying to "drain the swamp"...
Proof positive that the Democrats and LIberals are not slow at taking advantage of a disaster or horrendous event. As for the statement regarding the kids, I think it also demonstrates the sad state of our educational system in that they know and understand so little about our history and our own Government and Constitution. The media though cares little to point that out though as they are singing in the same choir to the same tune.
Regarding the moves by many companies to restrict the sales of guns to those over 21 and the moves within many legislatures to do the same I have no opposition to it. I would say however there needs to be an exception made for those 18 to 21-year-old persons that join and serve in the military. If they joined and serve(d) in the military then they should get an exception to that rule for they no only have been trained in the use of those weapons they have put their lives on the line for the Nation and if they are old enough to die for the nation then they deserve the right to purchase a gun.
gbrk posted:Proof positive that the Democrats and LIberals are not slow at taking advantage of a disaster or horrendous event. As for the statement regarding the kids, I think it also demonstrates the sad state of our educational system in that they know and understand so little about our history and our own Government and Constitution. The media though cares little to point that out though as they are singing in the same choir to the same tune.
Regarding the moves by many companies to restrict the sales of guns to those over 21 and the moves within many legislatures to do the same I have no opposition to it. I would say however there needs to be an exception made for those 18 to 21-year-old persons that join and serve in the military. If they joined and serve(d) in the military then they should get an exception to that rule for they no only have been trained in the use of those weapons they have put their lives on the line for the Nation and if they are old enough to die for the nation then they deserve the right to purchase a gun.
Do they still make the exception for the purchase of alcohol? I know they use to and for once, you and I agree on this topic. If they can fight for us all, they can be considered full on adults in every way!
gbrk posted:Proof positive that the Democrats and LIberals are not slow at taking advantage of a disaster or horrendous event. As for the statement regarding the kids, I think it also demonstrates the sad state of our educational system in that they know and understand so little about our history and our own Government and Constitution. The media though cares little to point that out though as they are singing in the same choir to the same tune.
Regarding the moves by many companies to restrict the sales of guns to those over 21 and the moves within many legislatures to do the same I have no opposition to it. I would say however there needs to be an exception made for those 18 to 21-year-old persons that join and serve in the military. If they joined and serve(d) in the military then they should get an exception to that rule for they no only have been trained in the use of those weapons they have put their lives on the line for the Nation and if they are old enough to die for the nation then they deserve the right to purchase a gun.
They have no idea what AR means either.