gbrk posted:After all this time, after all the investigations, subpoenas and witnesses all while Donald Trump is as good as convicted for Russian Collusion before the nation and in the News/Media nightly for over a year, you have indictments against ONLY Russians. Never did, to my knowledge, even Republicans insist that Russians did not try to influence or affect our elections. The argument that Republicans, and Donald Trump, has been making is that the Trump Campaign DID NOT COLLUDE with the Russians to defeat Hillary and win the election.
Up to now the emphasis that the media and the investigation have been proceeding under has been that there was collusion between Trump and the Russians. FAILURE for Mueller to come up with a single indictment against an American or a Trump Campaign official or employee should be evidence and proof enough that such collusion never existed in the first place. NO EVIDENCE = No Indictment. yet the media and many liberals still attempt to sell the Trump Campaign collusion story or argument.
Again no one argues that the Russians haven't been trying to influence the elections, they have as has the United States in almost every other Nation's elections so they are guilty and we are guilty as are the Canadians, Israel, England, China and every other Nation. It's a standard operating procedure for a Nation to attempt to get favorable results in an election, toward their own Nation. The FAKE stuff is where the media, Democrats, and liberals are trying to say Trump and/or his campaign colluded to affect the outcome of the election. Otherwise, where is your PROOF/EVIDENCE of Trump's actual collusion with the Russians?
Funny, I thought the conclusion was up to Mueller, not the Republicans. Republicans trying to obstruct the investigation and come to their own conclusions is why a special investigator were appointed. Policing one's self never works out too well for Republicans.