Reply to "Bush power increasing presidential power"

quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:
Originally posted by miamizsun:
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:

THE SUPREME COURT HAS UPHELD THE 16TH AMENDMENT. REPEATEDLY.



Was the 16th Amendment properly ratified? Watch the documentary. (You'll see people beat it, legally.) If you can prove it, you could be eligible for $100 Grand or so.


I only pointed out that the ratification was proper enough to get past the Supreme Court. I have been arguing this particular urban myth for well over eight years. I AM CERTAIN of the statement that the 16th amendment passes scruitiny.

NOW, the arguement agaist the insane concept that you can have government WITHOUT having taxation. AND THE EVEN MORE INSANE belief that a graduated income tax is evil, and should be replaced with some other kind of tax. IF THE INCOME TAX IS ELIMINATED, THE ALTERNATIVES ARE ALL REGRESSIVE, WILL PUT ADDITIONAL PRESSURE ON MIDDLE CLASS WORKERS, AND WILL ENRICH ONLY THE PEOPLE NOW PAYING TAXES ON OBSCENELY LARGE INCOMES.
Stop removing your proboscis to spite the face, without it you can't stick your nose into my business.


Your concerns are addressed in the video. Watch it, watch what happens when the IRS is challenged. The Supreme Court decision on the 16th Amendment is that it gives no "new" power of taxation. So the SC rules that it isn't valid and the lower courts should be in line with the SC. If you watch the video, we'll have something to wax on. Gotta go, work calls. Regards, miamizsun

×
×
×
×