Skip to main content

Reply to "Creationist Fallacies"

I want to point out something here somewhat off the subject since I brought up Sapolsky.

Some history: on dumb ass Michael Shermer’s Skeptic site,

 

Is it Worth Paying Attention to Wikipedia?

Yes, it absolutely is. This is a shining opportunity for the skeptical movement. Wikipedia is among the most important public sources for almost any scientific, pseudoscientific, or paranormal topic. A Wikipedia article is almost always the number one Google hit for that subject.

http://www.skeptic.com/get_inv...d/fix_wikipedia.html

 

he urges his atheistic followers to edit Wikipedia to benefit to atheistic movement assuming the general publick who use the internet are stupid and need the lacks of dawkins co-idiot dan barker to interject Sapolsky is an atheist.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Sapolsky

[see note 4]

 

……..so idiot dan barker gets on Wiki and claims Sapolsky.

 

I’m sure Sapolsky is an atheist but Sapolsky wouldn’t wipe his foot on barker in other than a sarcastic tongue in cheek acceptance of the stupid award..

 

Barker is no Sapolsky and when I see Sapolsky I’m going to kick his **** for even being in the same building with the idiot.

 

Now back to the subject at hand.

 


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×