Skip to main content

Reply to "New Roy Moore accuser"

gbrk posted:
SirWasabi posted:

Let me get this straight, because you don't agree with the decision to not prosecute Hillary, and after at least 15 years of investigating the Clintons, we need to investigate the Clintons more. AND your own words 'woman who has targeted Roy Moore for destruction.' Sounds like you've got your mind made up, as well.

Now, there are actually 5 women ,who didn't even know each other, with the same story. Records from a mall where Roy Moore was banned for harassing teen girls. Roy Moore's wife is the same age as the most recent lady who came forward. Evidence is there, if you want to see it.

First of all it isn't that I don't agree with any decision not to prosecute Hillary that's far too premature as she hasn't really been investigated for any potential crimes or irregularities with the Campaign with respect to DNC finances nor with respect to the Clinton (clearing) foundation.  First you have to have a finding of wrong doing, then a trial, then if convicted at that time the prosecution to like or dislike.   Hillary's Investigation never got going with respect to the Clinton Foundation and what happened with Hillary I would not call an investigation but rather a lack of it, she didn't even testify under oath or wasn't put under oath when interviewed by the FBI/Justice Department and didn't even agree to the interview until Bill Clinton (her husband) met with the top Justice dept official, Loretta Lynch, in Lynch's plane, most likely to get a heads up about what she (Hillary) could expect.  Her ONLY grilling came at the bequest of Congress and that was on the Benghazi matter.  So to say she's been investigated is in error as Obama and his administration's justice department under Loretta Lynch never would investigate her, for anything.  I do think it deserves to be looked at and at least investigated but Republicans may not go with it at this point.  So please, with respect to me and what I've said ... PLEASE get it right!

As for the woman and the targeted for destruction I meant regarding his campaign.  There really is no other reason to come forward at this point in time unless it's to insure he doesn't get elected.  IF HE IS GUILTY then he deserves to lose and suffer account of it.  Also, regarding the women, it is a possibly that she is right and a possibility she is not but until we know more we just don't know.  All of these women have targeted Moore in hopes he would not get elected and if they are telling the truth which I can say potentially they are, then he deserves to lose.  That's a lot different than what you are alleging I was saying.  If you don't see that then you are flying blind through here with nothing but your agenda and bias leading you.

Again, you've shown your bias while railing about my bias. I obviously 'got it right'. Your bias is leading you, it's obvious to anyone outside the Republican party.Tell me what that word was, one more time?

As far as Hillary goes, I'd say 20+ years of investigations, by the Republicans, should be enough. Republicans wasted MILLIONS OF DOLLARS investigating Hillary to no avail. But, I'm sure it's not over,  yet.

Last edited by SirWasabi

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×