And the answer that the believers insist they have given "over and over" is, of course, the old argument of "free will." As if that answers anyhting at all.
The funny thing, to me, is that I am certain that none of the believers here even grasp the fundamentals of the philosophical concept of "free will." I could make a very cogent argument that "free will" does not exist in this universe. I could equally argue that it does.
___________________________________________________________________________
Unob, I really like liver and onions. I am aware that many do not. If they asked me why I like it, the ONLY answer I could honestly give is, "Because it tastes good to me." People may not ACCEPT that answer. They might say it is no answer at all, but they'd be wrong because it IS the answer, and the ONLY honest answer. If no one wants to accept the truth, there is nothing more I can say.
Do you see NOW, FINALLY?
So you could argue both ways about whether free will exists or not. So, you are saying that even though you don't accept our "answer", you can't PROVE we are wrong?