See uno I give you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't see it or read it. I know you wouldn't say something so crazy so I repeated it. You ask a question and I answered ... unsurprisingly ummm .. no reply expected. Again either read above or go to my post back to you responding at 1:54 PM earlier.
GB, lie Bill's rambling posts, you go on far too long so, no, I didn't read all your post so, yes, I missed this answer.
And you are right, I don't accept it. I am certain that you and Ono could go through the bible and come up with disagreements on all sorts of laws. In fact, I bet your disagreements would be about the same number of disagreements you'd have with an atheist over moral issues,
Example, I bet Ono supports *** marriage. You almost certainty do not. Ono accepts the overwhelming evidence for evolution, you absolutely do not. Ono does not accept the "Once saved, always saved" but I bet you do and if you don't, Bill certainly does.
And you all three possess this gift of "spiritual discernment" that you both insist I do not have and never had.
So how can it be that you both have this give to "properly" interpret the bible yet you both disagree over such important matters? I know the answer here. Do you?