Skip to main content

Reply to "The Beginning?"

Originally Posted by Ubu:

OldSalt, your thoughts on this?

 

http://www.worldscientific.com...42/S0218271814500588

 

Many Thanks in Advance.

----------------------------------

An interesting abstract.  Unfortunately, I don't have access to the complete article.

 

As the authors said:

 

"We do not claim that the consistency of the adopted model with SB data is sufficient by itself to confirm what would be a radical transformation in our understanding of the cosmos. 

However, we believe this result is more than sufficient reason to examine this combination of hypotheses further."

In other words, the authors do not claim their findings overturns cosmic expansion theory, but should studied further.
Any Static Universe theory must be able to explain observational data including Cosmic Background Radiation and Hubble's red shift.

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×