Stanky posted:L. Cranston posted:This whole issue isn't about abortion. This issue is about overturning Supreme Court Decisions from that time frame. If you can get them to overturn one, you open the door to others. The true goal is Brown v Board of Ed. *read that segregation. The next thing Republicans will attack is 'diversity'. They have an endgame and they're 4 steps ahead of Democrats.
Once they can remove the segregation laws, they can funnel tax dollars straight to their charter schools and leave the 'brown kids' with public education. They have a plan and it's moving along nicely.
The only thing that conservatives want is to stop what they see as murder. If a woman can have a child killed a second before they pop out a ******, why not a year or two after? After all people have done that in the past and some people still do that in many parts of the world. Children with defects and girls were often thrown out like garbage to die of exposure or to feed the scavengers in the Greco-Roman culture, most primitive tribes bash their heads in, and Japanese practiced "mabiki" in the past, usually smothering unwanted children.
Babies born to slaves were used as alligator-bait in the United States. We already have laws against murder. Again, show me the stats you have about women killing children a second before they are born. The conservative arguments against Roe vs Wade are flimsy. If a state can regulate the process now, why the push to overturn Roe vs Wade? Given the history of this country, it's wise to question the motives of some people if they can't give a straight answer and keep changing the narrative. It's a women's body, it's her choice.