Skip to main content

Reply to "Upcoming debate at UNA: God does not exist"

"It was his Contention that he could prove that God doesn't exist or prove a negative which he, in the first three minutes of the Debate, admitted he could not do. "


That is not true. Blair Scott had nothing to do with the title of the debate and he did not say that he could prove God did not exist. That was the words of Kyle Butt and the UNA Christian Club. What Blair did say was that he and everyone else can come to the logical and probable conclusion that there is no God. Using the same logic and reasoning we do with many other myths. Tooth fairy, Loch Ness monster, etc.... The burden is and will always be on those that say that God does exist. If I say that something is real then I have to prove it before I could expect anyone to believe me. It is not on anyone else to prove me wrong if they have no good reason to believe me in the first place.


I will agree that Blair Scott is not the polished and slick speaker that Kyle Butt is. Kyle is a great preacher. He should be a politician. He can twist and turn with the best of the snakes.


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×