Skip to main content

Reply to "Why Should Someone be Banned?"

quote:    Originally Posted by FirenzeVeritas:

Bill, I see you posted while I was typing. I don't think using a screen name is being ashamed. I think it would have kept Wooly from doing what he did. If Wooly was really concerned, he would  have contacted you in private. His actions may not have proved he's evil, but it did prove him to be childish. I can debate anyone on here without bringing their family into it.


Hi Firenze,

 

You are right.  I do not believe that most Christians posting on the Religion Forum use pseudonyms because they are are ashamed.   And, I do not believe this applies just to Christians.  I am sure that many folks use a pseudonym because it allows them to be more bold in speaking their mind.  And, I am sure there are numerous other reasons folks use a pseudonym.  Many professional writers even do this when they publish books of a different genre than folks are accustomed to seeing from them.

 

I guess what I was really trying to say is that I could not use a pseudonym because I would feel that I was acting as though I am ashamed of the Gospel.  So, if anyone took that as a personal affront -- I apologize.  I was only trying to explain to Chick and to Jennifer why I cannot use any name except my own personal name.

 

Quite honestly, I do hope that Dwight does get reinstated.  But, when he does (or when he comes back under a new pseudonym) -- I pray that he will not be so confrontational with those of us who cannot believe his Mormon teachings -- and for those of us who feel that we must refute those teachings.   We can do this and still be Friends.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×