Skip to main content

Reply to "World War III (World War 3)"

Keeping with the topic

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/r...able-satan-2-7935675

Why would anyone create such a weapon if there was not an intent to possibly use it in a first strike situation.  This is the danger of appearing too weak or indecisive that someone might think twice that they could actually survive a retaliation to a first strike or that what's left would be too unwilling to strike back but rather negotiate.  I may be wrong but I think one thing, in today's world, that insures our safety is our ability to utterly destroy anyone that would seek to strike us.

Not that Donald Trump would do that but his reputation so far is to strike back at anyone that hits him only to strike back in a highly amped up way several times greater.


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×