Skip to main content

Tagged With "District Court Judge"

Reply

Re: Wonder how you right wingers would be coping if Trump won the popular vote but lost the election?

Crash.Override ·
sure ain't over... trump's due in court this month. ha!
Reply

Re: Wonder how you right wingers would be coping if Trump won the popular vote but lost the election?

budsfarm ·
Matter of national security? Anybody die? Lie to Congress? Lie to the FBI? Go riot in the streets. lefties. Burn something. Break windows. It's what y'all do best.
Reply

Re: Wonder how you right wingers would be coping if Trump won the popular vote but lost the election?

gbrk ·
The State of the Nation under Obama's leadership and the result of Government giving people who won't work everything is playing out before our eyes in the massive protest to Trumps elections you see in the major cities. Everyone is afraid that Trump and the Republicans are going to take away all their freebies and make them get a job in order to survive. The Great Depression would be nothing compared to where we would be if more and more social programs and freebies are given out to those...
Reply

Re: Just the facts man:

mad American ·
Nothing the mainstream media is saying makes sense. I know a lifelong democrat voter who voted for trump, because he couldn't stand what today's democrats stand for. There are many white males that voted for obama the first time who didn't vote for him the second time or hillary this time. The ball is in the republicans court, it they screw it up I will start voting libertarian.
Reply

Re: Democrats are quivering, with fear, in their boots.

Stanky ·
Actually Ol'bama screwed other pension funds that had bonds in GM and Chrysler and also the taxpayer in general. Everything that was done could have been done in bankruptcy court just like other industries like the airlines. http://www.heritage.org/resear...g-union-compensation
Reply

Re: See Bill...the problem is you didn't kill anyone.

Jutu ·
SANTA ANA, Calif. (KABC) -- The Orange County District Attorney's Office on Tuesday issued a community warning after seven high-risk sex-offenders were recently released early from county jails. The sex offenders were let out this month by Court Commissioner Joseph Dane despite being charged with tampering with their GPS monitoring devices, the D.A.'s office said in a news release. "These kinds of high-risk sex offenders are the most dangerous kind of criminal and the most likely to...
Reply

Re: See Bill...the problem is you didn't kill anyone.

Jutu ·
Sex offender, sprung from California jail due to coronavirus, arrested for indecent exposure A California sex offender released from jail early due to the coronavirus had been charged with exposing himself at a parole resource center, according to a report. Rudy William Grajeda Magdaleno, 39, was released from jail under a court order on April 13 after serving 71 days of a 180-day minimum sentence, Fox 11 Los Angeles reported Friday. The sentence was imposed after Magdaleno was accused of...
Reply

Re: I guess it's a liberal thing

Naio ·
chirp chirp little bird... Every time I vote, it takes less than 10 minutes. Mainly because voter participation is so low. Elections should always be free and fair. It's not fair that it's that quick in some places but some people have to wait 7 hours to vote. It's only like that because of the gop: https://www.esquire.com/news-p...-vote-super-tuesday/ "in the wake of the Supreme Court’s having gutted the Voting Rights Act, Texas had gone out of its way to close 750 polling places." This is...
Reply

Re: A Historic Contrast ... Unprecedented!

gbrk ·
What's really hilarious is the Democrats have presented the Senate with two articles of impeachment neither of which contains or cites any laws broken. One item alleges abuse of power and the other "obstruction of Congress". Regarding the obstruction of Congress that should be dismissed without even making it to a Senate vote because the President did the right, and correct, and constitutional thing by taking it to court for the Court to rule whether he had the right to claim executive...
Reply

Re: The worst day for Democracy since the Civil War

JH1961 ·
The Democrats strove to make a 'kangaroo court' of any presidential impeachment, a la the old Soviet Union.
Reply

Re: Man accused of shooting wife

Joseph Underwood ·
Post the link for the suggestion. I looked for it, but didn't find it and don't remember reading it in the terms agreed to at sign up. And yes i do read them, but I'm studying for finals and brain fried. They also suggest to be courteous and refrain from personal attacks. Are not the first few posts from none friends and family members rather personal attacks on him and then on his family and friends? Next I don't mind people calling cops over domestic disputes, but they state a history of...
Reply

Re: Man accused of shooting wife

Joseph Underwood ·
The TP thing I'm not sure of. Southerners have a long tradition or conservative views on firearms. Maybe I overstated using the term "most" as a large part of the populace lives in urban areas now, but I will look up the stats. Plus I know full well under the right circumstances a six year old can be educated. A six or seven year old is not too small to start teaching how to use a rifle, bow and arrow, or any other weapon with proper supervision. One only needs to ensure access to it is only...
Reply

Re: Man accused of shooting wife

dogsoldier0513 ·
Originally Posted by Joseph Underwood: The TP thing I'm not sure of. Southerners have a long tradition or conservative views on firearms. Maybe I overstated using the term "most" as a large part of the populace lives in urban areas now, but I will look up the stats. Plus I know full well under the right circumstances a six year old can be educated. A six or seven year old is not too small to start teaching how to use a rifle, bow and arrow, or any other weapon with proper supervision. One...
Reply

Re: Ted Nugent: "Obama White House is Mao Zedong Fan Club"

O No! ·
Here is some info about the moron from Wiki: He has had two wives and has eight children, including three out of wedlock in two liaisons almost 30 years apart. In the late 1960s, prior to his first marriage, Nugent fathered a boy and a girl, who he gave up for adoption in infancy. This did not become public knowledge until 2010 or 2011. The siblings were adopted separately and had no contact with one another. The son learned the identity of his birth father in 2010 through the daughter's...
Reply

Re: Christs original teachings restored

Jennifer ·
No offense WS but I don't think anyone wants you to "teach" them about your "truths". As we have told bill, this is no one's private little church. The TD didn't put the religion forum here for anyone to hold "court", say how they think it should run, think they know who has the right to post here and who doesn't, and to decide what should and should not be posted. This is not a church. I know without any doubt if they were to make an Atheist forum all of you so called christians would flock...
Reply

Re: speling an punktuashun

PuF ·
I've been working with someone that does their monthly reports using a lot of text talk, run on sentences, etc, and i've had to translate it into readable court reports. NOT easy.
Reply

Re: Now this is just plain SICK!

JimiHendrix ·
No, it has nothing to do with their race, although race was the reason that Thomas is on the court and Condi is just a war criminal who, like GW Bush and Cheney, can never travel to some parts of Europe, where they would be arrested and tried for their crimes.
Reply

Re: Obama: The Muslim

skippy delepepper ·
Obama didn't admitt he was anything but a Christian. I can't see it. I truly believe he is a Muslim. And yes dittohead I have problem with that. He is a liar according to my mother and mothers around the country. He claims to be Christian, then gets elected, then he shows us all his true colors. He joined the Rev. Wrights Church because he was a radical and hates the USA. (Oh and Whitey). Being a member of Wright's flock, he was able to claim to be a Christian and still hear what he...
Reply

Re: Romneycare and Obamacare Not the Same

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Romneycare is something Romney has been trying to distinguish from "Obamacare," but he has not done a very good job of it. Romney is a creature of expediency. When he thought that Massachusetts voters would support Romneycare, he gave it to them. Now that the right wing propaganda machine has defamed "Obamacare," and the majority of Republican voters don't want it, he is weaseling and crawfishing in all kinds of ways...
Reply

Re: Taking Liberties: Florida Man in Push to Get Confederate License Plate Approved

upsidedehead ·
The court is right on this one and the legislator is wrong. The state does not have the right to assert "viewpoint discrimination." I am no fan of the old Confederacy, but to deny these folks their preferred specialty plate while approving scads of others is purely discriminatory.
Reply

Re: Ted Nugent: "Obama White House is Mao Zedong Fan Club"

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by O No!: Here is some info about the moron from Wiki: He has had two wives and has eight children, including three out of wedlock in two liaisons almost 30 years apart. In the late 1960s, prior to his first marriage, Nugent fathered a boy and a girl, who he gave up for adoption in infancy. This did not become public knowledge until 2010 or 2011. The siblings were adopted separately and had no contact with one another. The son learned the identity of his birth father in...
Reply

Re: Romneycare and Obamacare Not the Same

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Romneycare is something Romney has been trying to distinguish from "Obamacare," but he has not done a very good job of it. Romney is a creature of expediency. When he thought that Massachusetts voters would support Romneycare, he gave it to them. Now that the right wing propaganda machine has defamed "Obamacare," and the majority of Republican voters don't want it, he is weaseling...
Reply

Re: Should Illegal Immigrants From South Of The Border Be Given Special Treatment?

JimiHendrix ·
Originally Posted by dogsoldier0513: ALL illegal aliens, REGARDLESS of country of origin, should be apprehended and deported. America has a lawful process by which immigrants can LEGALLY enter this country and become citizens. Immigrants unwilling to follow this process are 'thumbing their collective noses' at ALL legal immigrants and do not belong here. A Federal Appeals Court in Kansas recently ruled that "remaining in the country after entering illegally is not illegal".
Reply

Re: Romneycare and Obamacare Not the Same

skippy delepepper ·
Y Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Hey skippy, What law school did you graduate fromWherever it was, you received a poor education in Constitutional law. Hey Dork, any fool that can read and will. Can read in the Constitution Artical One Section Eight. The Enumerated powers of the US Federal Gov't. Nothing in this gives the Federal Gov't the power to force anyone to purchase health insurance or pay in to SS as far as...
Reply

Re: Romneycare and Obamacare Not the Same

JimiHendrix ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Y Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Hey skippy, What law school did you graduate fromWherever it was, you received a poor education in Constitutional law. Hey Dork, any fool that can read and will. Can read in the Constitution Artical One Section Eight. The Enumerated powers of the US Federal Gov't. Nothing in this gives the Federal Gov't the power to force anyone to purchase...
Reply

Re: Should Illegal Immigrants From South Of The Border Be Given Special Treatment?

dogsoldier0513 ·
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Originally Posted by dogsoldier0513: ALL illegal aliens, REGARDLESS of country of origin, should be apprehended and deported. America has a lawful process by which immigrants can LEGALLY enter this country and become citizens. Immigrants unwilling to follow this process are 'thumbing their collective noses' at ALL legal immigrants and do not belong here. A Federal Appeals Court in Kansas recently ruled that "remaining in the country after entering illegally...
Reply

Re: Sad Day for Girl Scouts

The Nagel ·
Originally Posted by CageTheElephant: The Boy Scouts do not receive Federal Funding . Ah. sorry. i'll go send a letter to CNN, fox news, the aclu, several courts where the trials are being held and let them all know they are wrong. thanks for clearing it up. i suppose they also have never thrown anyone out for being homosexual or athiest either. i'll let them know they were wrong about all that as well. Yes, letters would be a good thing, as there is NO GOVERNMENT FUNDING. Period. And, I...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Mr.Dittohead ·
Repeal the 4th. It doesnt mean anything anymore. Never flush when the popo is near or you could be arrested for destroying evidence.
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Renegade Nation ·
Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead: The ruling in the Kentucky case is just another in a long line of ridiculous rulings from the (UN)Supreme Court that makes a mockery of what is "constitutional". 200 hundred years of rulings from a branch of government that was never intended to be the final authority (the SCOTUS unconstitutionally assumed that power for themselves), has turned a document that had the sole purpose of limiting and chaining down the power of the federal government, to a...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Loki ·
Originally Posted by Jobe: Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. Remember the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution? “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by Loki: Originally Posted by Jobe: Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. Remember the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution? “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Mr.Dittohead ·
This is just a reflection of the changing interpretation of the 4th, which more or less began with the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act allows surveillance of Americans by several federal agencies without the requirement of a warrant from a judge, even though the FISA and its secret court provided a means to do so. Even the ACLU filed a brief in favor of repealing the Patriot Act.
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

The Propagandist ·
Originally Posted by Jobe: Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. Remember the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution? “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Renegade Nation ·
Originally Posted by The Propagandist: Originally Posted by Jobe: Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. Remember the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution? “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

interventor1212 ·
This was a bad call by a state court, neither influenced by the Patriot Act, nor the Obama administration. Hopefully, the US courts will over rule this and the police who tasered an innocent man and left him unconscious will be successfully sued for much money. The ruling makes it easy for thiefs to impersonate police during a home invasion, precluding homeowner resistance.
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Mr.Dittohead ·
http://www.mikechurch.com/Toda...earches-we-will.html
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Loki ·
The Patriot Act was not even a consideration in this decision by the court. The court is not following the constitution and making it up as they go. Liberal Judges believe they are the Law. And as far as the Patriot Act, both parties Democrat and Republican. The Country was scared and decided to take extraordinary measures to protect this Country. You socialists can't continue to blame Republicans forever for everything. Skippy First off, I'm neither liberal, conservative, democrat,...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Winston Niles Rumfoord ·
Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead: Repeal the 4th. It doesnt mean anything anymore. Never flush when the popo is near or you could be arrested for destroying evidence. Instead of repealing the 4th., why not fight tyrannical government? Seems you don't care about, or deserve liberty.
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Mr.Dittohead ·
RIAA Legislation: No Warrant Required to Search, Seize Optical-Disc Plants
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by Loki: The Patriot Act was not even a consideration in this decision by the court. The court is not following the constitution and making it up as they go. Liberal Judges believe they are the Law. And as far as the Patriot Act, both parties Democrat and Republican. The Country was scared and decided to take extraordinary measures to protect this Country. You socialists can't continue to blame Republicans forever for everything. Skippy First off, I'm neither liberal,...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

JimiHendrix ·
The ruling in the Kentucky case is just another in a long line of ridiculous rulings from the (UN)Supreme Court that makes a mockery of what is "constitutional". 200 hundred years of rulings from a branch of government that was never intended to be the final authority (the SCOTUS unconstitutionally assumed that power for themselves), has turned a document that had the sole purpose of limiting and chaining down the power of the federal government, to a dcoument that "rubber stamps" anything...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

wright35633 ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by wright35633: First let me say I believe in our rights to be secure in our homes, papers, etc. Here is an optimistic take on the situation. In order to enter a home the police must have two things. Probable cause and a warrant. This ruling is simply an exception to the warrant clause. The police will still require probable cause to enter a home. Just knocking and bursting the door open because a toilet flushes will (and should not)...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by wright35633: Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by wright35633: First let me say I believe in our rights to be secure in our homes, papers, etc. Here is an optimistic take on the situation. In order to enter a home the police must have two things. Probable cause and a warrant. This ruling is simply an exception to the warrant clause. The police will still require probable cause to enter a home. Just knocking and bursting the door open because a...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

wright35633 ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by wright35633: Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by wright35633: First let me say I believe in our rights to be secure in our homes, papers, etc. Here is an optimistic take on the situation. In order to enter a home the police must have two things. Probable cause and a warrant. This ruling is simply an exception to the warrant clause. The police will still require probable cause to enter a home. Just knocking...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Renegade Nation ·
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: The ruling in the Kentucky case is just another in a long line of ridiculous rulings from the (UN)Supreme Court that makes a mockery of what is "constitutional". 200 hundred years of rulings from a branch of government that was never intended to be the final authority (the SCOTUS unconstitutionally assumed that power for themselves), has turned a document that had the sole purpose of limiting and chaining down the power of the federal government, to a...
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

JimiHendrix ·
Perhaps that conservatives are more likely to rule against the constitution. BTW, most justices are not lawyers. There seems to be a preponderance of ignorance about the court here.
Reply

Re: 4th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Renegade Nation ·
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Perhaps that conservatives are more likely to rule against the constitution. BTW, most justices are not lawyers. There seems to be a preponderance of ignorance about the court here. History has shown that being consrvative or liberal doesn't deter from straying from the Constitution. By the way, are you actually trying to assert that "most" justices are not lawyers?...as in law school, pass the bar, and never practiced or taught law? It seems the...
Reply

Re: Wisconsin recall elections set.

Blind Melon Chit'lin ·
Citizens are seeking to recall? My God! Do you only get to town once a year? The citizens HAVE spoken. November 2010 Wisconsin results ring any bells? HELLO? If your assertion had any merit, Democrats would have easily won the recent Supreme Court election. But the Democrat was stomped by 7,000 votes despite a heaviliy publicized anti-Walker campaign funded by unions, and a COSTLY charade, paid for by the Wisconsin taxpayers, for a "recount" pushed on them by the Dems / Union trying to steal...
Reply

Re: 5.24 tuesday

Elb the Bum ·
Originally Posted by WesternOne: My brain... my neck.... my back.... I want one hundred and fiddy thou... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- will you settle outta court for an ice cold 40 and a pack of papers?
Reply

Re: not politically correct

Mr.Dittohead ·
Evers is openly, publicly, and without any apparent shame promising that if gun owners exercise their constitutional rights in Philadelphia in a manner that is well within the confines of the law, they can expect a potentially violent confrontation with police.
 
Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×