Skip to main content

Tagged With "Bristol Palin"

Reply

Re: Purgatory And Hell - Biblical Or Not?

Bill Gray ·
Hi O, Thank you for your prayers. As I said, I do desperately need them. You say I defame God's name by mixing my Christian beliefs with my political views. I do not separate the two -- for my Christian faith most certainly affects my world/political view. And, I pray that come 2012, we will have a person in the White House who shares my Christian world/political view. You say that I take God's name in vain by keeping Him in my world/political view; I say that I honor Him by keeping Him in...
Reply

Re: Herman Cain Announces Run For White House

upsidedehead ·
Add Cain to the growing list of dingbat wingnuts, including Palin, Bachmann, Alan (The Interrogator) West, and Newt (washed-up, foot-in-mouth) Gingrich announcing or considering candidacy for the GOP nomination. Solid, respectable candidates like Mitt Romney, John Huntsman and Tim Pawlenty should not have to put up with these off-the-wall types, but that is how the system works. Any doofus can run for the office in this great nation. But the electorate--even the Republican element--is...
Reply

Re: Herman Cain Announces Run For White House

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Add Cain to the growing list of dingbat wingnuts, including Palin, Bachmann, Alan (The Interrogator) West, and Newt (washed-up, foot-in-mouth) Gingrich announcing or considering candidacy for the GOP nomination. Solid, respectable candidates like Mitt Romney, John Huntsman and Tim Pawlenty should not have to put up with these off-the-wall types, but that is how the system works. Any doofus can run for the office in this great nation. But the...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by tigrtrek: http://politicalwire.com/archi...%28Political+Wire%29 Hey Tigger, another example of the thrill up your leg press, trying to trash Palin. Palin was simply taken out of context. Listen carefully to her, it's not what you portray. Skippy
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

wright35633 ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by tigrtrek: http://politicalwire.com/archi...%28Political+Wire%29 Hey Tigger, another example of the thrill up your leg press, trying to trash Palin. Palin was simply taken out of context. Listen carefully to her, it's not what you portray. Skippy Skippy my man. I like you. I really do. She just got busted not knowing what really happened.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

seeweed ·
If Skippy is correct, and Palin is right, then I guess most of us need to reevaluate our 7th grade educational experience. On the other hand, the woman just dosen't really understand the first thing about our history.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by interventor1212: Incorrect about ringing the bell from the bell tower. Otherwise, accurate. "...and making sure as he's riding his horse through town to send the warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free." That gibberish is just part of the awful mess she blithered. Can you envision it--the boldly riding silversmith firing his musket as he rides through the towns, his message being not so much "The British are coming" as "Not to...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by seeweed: If Skippy is correct, and Palin is right, then I guess most of us need to reevaluate our 7th grade educational experience. On the other hand, the woman just dosen't really understand the first thing about our history. The woman doesn't understand much of anything, period. Never in the history of the republic has anyone so decidedly incompetent been taken anywhere near as seriously as the sheeple take this Wacko of Wasilla!
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by seeweed: If Skippy is correct, and Palin is right, then I guess most of us need to reevaluate our 7th grade educational experience. On the other hand, the woman just dosen't really understand the first thing about our history. I didn't say she was right. I just think that you have a case of the pot calling the kettle black. (Did I just say that?) You call Palin stupid and forget all about the idiot in the White House.(Did I just say that?) As Ray Stevens sang,"yea I...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

JimiHendrix ·
Palin doesn't need to be on vacation. She needs to be in summer school.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

tigrtrek ·
I actually don't dislike Palin I just thought this was funny. Also I wanted to see how many responses it would get.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

skippy delepepper ·
Palin is a true Patriot, but I personally wouldn't want Palin as President. I do like her and her hearts in the right place. I just think she isn't electable. I personally wish the Thrill up their leg press would have treated the idiot in the White House the same way. Unfortunantly we would have had McCain. Diffidently not a Win-Win. But better than the CHOSEN ONE. Skippy
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

Mr.Dittohead ·
Palin doubles down on her mistake on the Sunday morning news. If Palin knows her American history, this latest bit of jujitsu shows no evidence of it. The purpose of Revere’s ride was to inform John Hancock, Samuel Adams, and other colonial American patriots that the British Army was marching from Boston to Lexington. As such, secrecy and stealth were essential. So contrary to Palin’s claim that Revere warned the British they would not succeed, Revere attempted to avoid all contact with...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

JimiHendrix ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: I think she knows there are 50 states and not 57 like Obama thought. But that THRILL UP YOUR LEG MEDIA, Chris Wallace included, seem to over look the many mistakes Obama has made. Let's start with 20 years as a member of the Infamous Rev. Wright's Anti- American, Anti- White/ Jew/ anything but black racist Church. Praise the Lord. How about the Black Panther security guards intimidating voters with a billy club. That Obama's Attorney General Holder...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: I think she knows there are 50 states and not 57 like Obama thought. But that THRILL UP YOUR LEG MEDIA, Chris Wallace included, seem to over look the many mistakes Obama has made. Let's start with 20 years as a member of the Infamous Rev. Wright's Anti- American, Anti- White/ Jew/ anything but black racist Church. Praise the Lord. How about the Black Panther security guards intimidating voters with a billy club. That...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

Mr.Dittohead ·
Palin did usher a huge windfall profits tax on oil taken from Alaskan deposits. Isnt that a socialist program??? http://seattletimes.nwsource.c...325_alaskatax07.html Still waiting for 2.5 more socialist OBama programs. Democare is only good for 1/2 credit.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

JimiHendrix ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: I think she knows there are 50 states and not 57 like Obama thought. But that THRILL UP YOUR LEG MEDIA, Chris Wallace included, seem to over look the many mistakes Obama has made. Let's start with 20 years as a member of the Infamous Rev. Wright's Anti- American, Anti- White/ Jew/ anything but black racist Church. Praise the Lord. How about the Black Panther security guards...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

skippy delepepper ·
Jimi said this about Sarah Palin. I’ll let him figure out which thread. "She isn't stupid." "She had better run." Skippy
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

LE89 ·
They can always revert back to their claims of her bus vacation trip is dangerous. "It adds up to a dangerous situation, says CBS News Producer Ryan Corsaro." "I just hope to God that one of these young producers with a camera whose bosses are making them follow Sarah Palin as a potential Republican candidate don't get in a car crash, because this is dangerous," he said. Corsaro asked a member of Palin's team if he thought it was dangerous to have reporters forced to chase her from stop to...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

upsidedehead ·
Not eating crow here. The link posted above included a comment from one reader that says it all very succinctly: "Revere did not ride for the purpose of alerting the British and that\'s what Palin was stumbling and mumbling about. He did not warn the British during his ride and it was his ride that Alaska\'s favorite quitter was talking about, not statements made \"after his capture\" The academician who attempted to vindicate Palin's distorted version failed miserably. His "analysis" has no...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

Mr.Dittohead ·
The Palin supporters tried to rewrite the Wiki article about Revere but were stymied by actual historians that monitor such activity. The The Teapublicans were claiming the Revere could see England from his house.
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

Blind Melon Chit'lin ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Not eating crow here. The link posted above included a comment from one reader that says it all very succinctly: "Revere did not ride for the purpose of alerting the British and that\'s what Palin was stumbling and mumbling about. He did not warn the British during his ride and it was his ride that Alaska\'s favorite quitter was talking about, not statements made \"after his capture\" The academician who attempted to vindicate Palin's distorted version...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by Blind Melon Chit'lin: Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Not eating crow here. The link posted above included a comment from one reader that says it all very succinctly: "Revere did not ride for the purpose of alerting the British and that\'s what Palin was stumbling and mumbling about. He did not warn the British during his ride and it was his ride that Alaska\'s favorite quitter was talking about, not statements made \"after his capture\" The academician who attempted...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by LE89: They sure are paying an awful lot of attention to someone they deem dumb and irrelevant. Fact is she isn't running, she is just scaring the living crap out of them. She created a landslide in the 2010 elections and she will likely do the same in the 2012 elections, at least on the Congressional side. Now before the two or three pollmasters get on here to tell me the polls say differently, how did those polls work out for ya in the 2004 Presidential election, or the...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

LE89 ·
Originally Posted by O No!: "she's making fools out of the die hard left" The onlly ones she's making a fool out of are herself and her "fans". I never said she was right, my point is she isn't running yet she is keeping the pot stirred up by driving the die hard left crazy. The media and the hard core left are concentrating on someone who is not running, out of fear. She was largely responsible for the 85 member swing in the 2010 elections, dumb as she may be, it is a fact. I've said it...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by Blind Melon Chit'lin: Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Originally Posted by meanasasnake: If only people could follow links. http://www.americanrevolution.org/revere.html mean-- There is no rehabilitating a suck-egg mule. The stubborn devotion to the fantasies of what now passes as conservatism (while Barry Goldwater spins at high rpms) can not be dislodged for so long as its adherents cling to emotion and myth as the underpinnings of their strangely torqued belief...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

ferrellj ·
Given the current as well as past demonstrated intelligence coming out of Washington how can anyone ridicule Sarah Palin's intelligence? You guys are nit-picking over tiny bits of info that may or may not be factually correct. Historical facts are always up for debate. I'm more worried about the "small bump in the road" we are living through than I am what Palin has to say about Paul Revere. I'm sure Obama and Anthony's Weiner are enjoying it though.
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

Blind Melon Chit'lin ·
Originally Posted by ferrellj: Given the current as well as past demonstrated intelligence coming out of Washington how can anyone ridicule Sarah Palin's intelligence? You guys are nit-picking over tiny bits of info that may or may not be factually correct. Historical facts are always up for debate. I'm more worried about the "small bump in the road" we are living through than I am what Palin has to say about Paul Revere. I'm sure Obama and Anthony's Weiner are enjoying it though. They...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Not eating crow here. The link posted above included a comment from one reader that says it all very succinctly: "Revere did not ride for the purpose of alerting the British and that\'s what Palin was stumbling and mumbling about. He did not warn the British during his ride and it was his ride that Alaska\'s favorite quitter was talking about, not statements made \"after his capture\" The academician who attempted to vindicate Palin's distorted version...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

Blind Melon Chit'lin ·
Ol upsidedehead may have a different handle...but Ms. Palin still gets a rise out of him.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead: Palin doubles down on her mistake on the Sunday morning news. If Palin knows her American history, this latest bit of jujitsu shows no evidence of it. The purpose of Revere’s ride was to inform John Hancock, Samuel Adams, and other colonial American patriots that the British Army was marching from Boston to Lexington. As such, secrecy and stealth were essential. So contrary to Palin’s claim that Revere warned the British they would not succeed, Revere...
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead: Palin did usher a huge windfall profits tax on oil taken from Alaskan deposits. Isnt that a socialist program??? http://seattletimes.nwsource.c...325_alaskatax07.html Still waiting for 2.5 more socialist OBama programs. Democare is only good for 1/2 credit. No, simply a tax upon assets within the state. Extract of minerals and oil are the two main profit centers for Alaska. Alabama has similar income including a $2.5 billion fund. ...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

upsidedehead ·
Interventor posts THIS irrelevancy as though it settled anything: "Two of the three academicians agreed with Palin. Revere's statement to his Brit captors proved true, as the column sent to seize American arms was cut to ribbons on its return from an unsuccessful mission." The statement Interventor referenced was indeed a statement to Revere's British captors, but it was not a statement that Revere rode forth to proclaim from horseback as Palin so ignorantly asserted. Revere's correct...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

Blind Melon Chit'lin ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Interventor posts THIS irrelevancy as though it settled anything: "Two of the three academicians agreed with Palin. Revere's statement to his Brit captors proved true, as the column sent to seize American arms was cut to ribbons on its return from an unsuccessful mission." The statement Interventor referenced was indeed a statement to Revere's British captors, but it was not a statement that Revere rode forth to proclaim from horseback as Palin so...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Interventor posts THIS irrelevancy as though it settled anything: "Two of the three academicians agreed with Palin. Revere's statement to his Brit captors proved true, as the column sent to seize American arms was cut to ribbons on its return from an unsuccessful mission." The statement Interventor referenced was indeed a statement to Revere's British captors, but it was not a statement that Revere rode forth to proclaim from horseback as Palin so...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

rocky ·
Just doing a drive by the good old TD Rethugliteacon Big Top Circus and notice we have a few new "clowns" in the center ring, but they are all singing the same old "Thug" talking point tunes. I love the observation of "Thugs" that those who are not Foxophiled and have maintained any objectivity are labeled with some syndrome, first it was Bush now it is Palin. BUT, what I REALLY love to see is the rethugliteacons turning on themselves. Does Ed Rollins, Michele Bachmanns new campaign manager...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by rocky: Just doing a drive by the good old TD Rethugliteacon Big Top Circus and notice we have a few new "clowns" in the center ring, but they are all singing the same old "Thug" talking point tunes. I love the observation of "Thugs" that those who are not Foxophiled and have maintained any objectivity are labeled with some syndrome, first it was Bush now it is Palin. BUT, what I REALLY love to see is the rethugliteacons turning on themselves. Does Ed Rollins, Michele...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by interventor1212: Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Interventor posts THIS irrelevancy as though it settled anything: "Two of the three academicians agreed with Palin. Revere's statement to his Brit captors proved true, as the column sent to seize American arms was cut to ribbons on its return from an unsuccessful mission." The statement Interventor referenced was indeed a statement to Revere's British captors, but it was not a statement that Revere rode forth to...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

Blind Melon Chit'lin ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Originally Posted by interventor1212: Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Interventor posts THIS irrelevancy as though it settled anything: "Two of the three academicians agreed with Palin. Revere's statement to his Brit captors proved true, as the column sent to seize American arms was cut to ribbons on its return from an unsuccessful mission." The statement Interventor referenced was indeed a statement to Revere's British captors, but it was not a...
Reply

Re: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical Paul Revere account

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Originally Posted by interventor1212: Originally Posted by upsidedehead: Interventor posts THIS irrelevancy as though it settled anything: "Two of the three academicians agreed with Palin. Revere's statement to his Brit captors proved true, as the column sent to seize American arms was cut to ribbons on its return from an unsuccessful mission." The statement Interventor referenced was indeed a statement to Revere's British captors, but it was not a...
Reply

Re: Prediction

Mr.Dittohead ·
Originally Posted by ferrellj: Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead: I merely point out his shortcomings so that everyone will make informed choices. Sorta like you did when Obama was running in 08? Wasnt necessary...McCain never had a chance. Repubs chances in 2012 are still good, but not with Gingrich, Romney, Santorum, Pawently, Cain, Palin, Paul or Perry.
Reply

Re: Herman Cain likes them short

b50m ·
Cain scaring you more than Palin now?
Reply

Re: Liberal Lemmings and the Palin Emails.

interventor1212 ·
From left wingers description of Palin, she's either an idiot, or a politician worthy of Machiavelli. They can't get their stories straight. Usually, when they show this level of hatred, they fear the person. Reagan was another.
Reply

Re: Liberal Lemmings and the Palin Emails.

tigrtrek ·
I wonder how much money the moonbat left has spent in its effort to discredit, humiliate and "expose" Sarah Palin.
Reply

Re: Seemed like a good idea

Mr.Dittohead ·
Originally Posted by interventor1212: If the tax cut hadn't happened, the increased revenue wouldn't have happened. What part of that can't you understand. I understand that revenues as a percentage of GDP were decreasing while deficits were increasing. I am done explaining math to you. Go live in your dream world, where Palin is smart, Rush is not a drug addict, and BushIIe was not the worst POUTUS in 100 years.
Reply

Re: President Barack Obama's Complete List of Historic Firsts

gbrk ·
Originally Posted by Winston Niles Rumfoord: Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Hate all you want. It accomplishes nothing. You Obama haters are just stupid. There is no other explanation. The explanation is that we can discern the truth, while all all of you Obama lovers are so deluded by propaganda that you believe anything his administration puts out. Even the liberal press and the dems are beginning to get skittish, but you thoroughly brainwashed can't give it up. And all those folks out...
Reply

Re: President Barack Obama's Complete List of Historic Firsts

Winston Niles Rumfoord ·
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: There is only one reason for the idiotic post of Invictus: Obama is the first BLACK President. If Obama were white, Invictus and dogsoldier, who are both hopelessly still fighting the Civil War, would have a lot more free time. I guess, then, you should be regarded as racist and sexist for your attitude about Cain, Palin, and Bachmann.
Reply

Re: Seemed like a good idea

interventor1212 ·
Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead: Originally Posted by interventor1212: If the tax cut hadn't happened, the increased revenue wouldn't have happened. What part of that can't you understand. I understand that revenues as a percentage of GDP were decreasing while deficits were increasing. I am done explaining math to you. Go live in your dream world, where Palin is smart, Rush is not a drug addict, and BushIIe was not the worst POUTUS in 100 years. With a Physics major, before my business...
Reply

Re: Is this the real reason Anthony Weiner was targeted?

b50m ·
No duffus, not like the KKK. You dems get that one. The Tea Party backs both dems and reps, you just missed that on your daily flier. It's whoever goes for the smallest government, least intrusive government and most open government. That usually leaves the dems out. You must have wrote this idiot's speech. Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee wasn’t just content to compare Tea Party protesters to the Ku Klux Klan during an interview on The Young Yurks. The two-term congressman, who took office in...
Reply

Re: Michelle Obama $540 sneakers to pass out food.

SHELDIVR ·
That girl just practicin' what she preach...Spread the wealth around...walk the walk, talk the talk...she jes' stimulatin' the ecomony..
 
Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×