Skip to main content

DUPLICITY: The atheists are guilty as hell of it.

DUPLICITY

(Dictionary.com) “deceitfulness in speech or conduct; speaking or acting in two different ways concerning the same matter with intent to deceive; double-dealing.”

    

        “

If science is to be defined as "empirical, observable & testable" then that definition should apply to evolution too! But what elements of evolution are "empirical, observable & testable"?”

          Surveys continue to reveal about two thirds of responders believe that God created the universe and life. Evolutionists argue that science is not performed by vote, thus what the majority believes does not matter. Yet the evolutionists often boast of the vast majorities of scientists that accept evolution as fact. They even have a running parody about the number of scientists named Steve who accept evolution as “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.” Since science is not established by vote or popularity then the evolutionists argument for the majority of scientists is also completely invalid. http://evidencepress.com/

 

I will be using this word often. beware of what you say

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm not commenting on lexum's post directly, but will make a comment concerning the "empirical" knowledge used in textbooks today. When I was in college the first time, I was taught that 28 genes controlled skin color. When I returned to nursing school, approximately ten years ago, I was taught that the "latest" thinking was that six genes control skin color. Recently, while studying another nursing topic, I saw a third number mentioned. I did not have the time to follow through with that in order to see if there are new theories/knowledge, etc.

 

Bottom line: We know very little and atheists condemn others for believing in God, but seem to follow whatever new theory is in style this nanosecond.

Bottom line: We know very little and atheists condemn others for believing in God, but seem to follow whatever new theory is in style this nanosecond.

 

 

Not really. I for one have posted over and over that science changes as it advances. That is why they call it "theory". Christians on the other hand "stand on the ridiculous things written in an ancient book by superstitious old men that had no idea how the world worked". A man from dirt and a woman from a bone. Dang I wish I had some swampland or a bridge to sell!!! As a nurse you should know how things change as people enter new areas of study. Not to insult you at all, but this is one reason I wouldn't feel as comfortable having a christian doctor or nurse, instead of an atheist, taking care of me if I was very ill.

Theory

A scientific theorysummarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.

Example: It is known that on June 30, 1908 in Tunguska, Siberia, there was an explosion equivalent to the detonation of about 15 million tons of TNT. Many hypotheses have been proposed for what caused the explosion. It is theorized that the explosion was caused by a natural extraterrestrial phenomenon, and was not caused by man. Is this theory a fact? No. The event is a recorded fact. Is this this theory generally accepted to be true, based on evidence to-date? Yes. Can this theory be shown to be false and be discarded? Yes.

 

http://chemistry.about.com/od/...y101/a/lawtheory.htm

Originally Posted by lexum:

DUPLICITY: The atheists are guilty as hell of it.

DUPLICITY

(Dictionary.com) “deceitfulness in speech or conduct; speaking or acting in two different ways concerning the same matter with intent to deceive; double-dealing.”     

___________________________________

And you don't think some Christians are guilty as Hell of it? I got a news flash for you. I read that duplicity here daily from some Christians. I see more honesty from the Atheist here than the hat wearing Christians. Atheist don't wear a mask, what you see is what you get.

DUPLICITY: The atheists are guilty as hell of it.

DUPLICITY

(Dictionary.com) “deceitfulness in speech or conduct; speaking or acting in two different ways concerning the same matter with intent to deceive; double-dealing.”

 

--------------

 

oh, this is rich. YOU the king of deception and lies dare to preach at other people about decietfulness. this proves how mentally unstable you really are Rram.

ole crust-0-matic sez:What kind of rat ******* hates amputees so much he won't answer their prayers, when he will - according to you - cure everyone else?  The god of your cult, Bill, will take care of a $5 problem you have, but obviously hates amputees.  You see, Bill, I'm not questioning God, I'm questioning your misguided take on God.

 

       crust quit showing out for DF and best and simi

Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:

Out of curiosity, lexum, when you were "born again" did you suffer brain damage during the rebirth?

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

I assure you jimbow, that this brain of mine has certainly contributed indirectly to any technology you have enjoyed. You thankless little egg.

Originally Posted by lexum:
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:

Out of curiosity, lexum, when you were "born again" did you suffer brain damage during the rebirth?

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

I assure you jimbow, that this brain of mine has certainly contributed indirectly to any technology you have enjoyed. You thankless little egg.

That brain of your can't even compose a sentence in your native language.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×