Skip to main content

I'm reminded of an old joke the Saudis used to say, "That if Arabia became communist there would be an oil shortage in two years and a sand shortage in four years."

Venezuela, despite more oil than the Saudis, has a gas shortage.  Nothing that a few well placed rounds wouldn't solve.

http://www.breitbart.com/natio...ation-runs-gasoline/

 

TRUTH -- THE NEW HATE SPEECH!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

direstraits posted:

I'm reminded of an old joke the Saudis used to say, "That if Arabia became communist there would be an oil shortage in two years and a sand shortage in four years."

Venezuela, despite more oil than the Saudis, has a gas shortage.  Nothing that a few well placed rounds wouldn't solve.

http://www.breitbart.com/natio...ation-runs-gasoline/

 

bahahahahahaha! this from one of the 'fake news' screaming idiots.. and the source.. breitbart. bahahahahahaha! you can't make this stuff up. bahahahahahaha!  between breitbart and your editorials, you're well informed. bahahahahahaha!

OBAMA!

Crash.Override posted:
direstraits posted:

I'm reminded of an old joke the Saudis used to say, "That if Arabia became communist there would be an oil shortage in two years and a sand shortage in four years."

Venezuela, despite more oil than the Saudis, has a gas shortage.  Nothing that a few well placed rounds wouldn't solve.

http://www.breitbart.com/natio...ation-runs-gasoline/

 

bahahahahahaha! this from one of the 'fake news' screaming idiots.. and the source.. breitbart. bahahahahahaha! you can't make this stuff up. bahahahahahaha!  between breitbart and your editorials, you're well informed. bahahahahahaha!

OBAMA!

You left something out of your rant and no, if wasn't made up.
So disprove it.
 
Baraak.!!!!! .......... or was that RuBuma..?????
jtdavis posted:

Which is a more reputable source for information, breitbart or facebook? Can you use one to check the accuracy of the other? I would really hate to only look at one or the other and be misinformed about current events.

The uninformed are hardly misinformed TJ, so stick with
your facebook and twist the night away.

another prime example... inforwars story on 'pizzagate' ..

there was a rally this weekend to 'expose pizzagate as fact' by the gullible conservative base....

it's a FACT that infowars even admitted the story was fake. (the 'pizzagate basement sex dungeon' can't exist. there's no basement. ha)

infowars now has 'press credentials' issued from the whitehouse.

republican reply.... twist your fake news...

you just can't make this stuff up. ha!

 

Crash.Override posted:

the president of the united states is under fbi investigation for treason.... i don't really care if venezeula has gas or not...

i do care if moose and squirrel have fbi on trail of boris and natasha.

The FBI is conducting a counter intelligence investigation, which is not considered criminal in nature.  But, rather to determine if the Russians were involved in an effort to disrupt the election. 

To be precise, did congress declare war recently?  The only crime described in the constitution is treason. For such a charge, there must be a state of war with another nation. 

Acting in their usual role of useful idiots, the confederacy of dunces AKA the Democrats did the most to enable the hackers to disrupt the election.

The DNC and RNC were hacked in 2015.  The FBI warned both. The RNC installed anti-hacking software.  The DNC didn't. Hacking started in earnest on DNC servers in April 2016 -- servers still unprotected.  John Podesta fell for a phishing ploy to expose his email password (PASSWORD).  Trump was considered a dark horse until late in the campaign. Even as the Republican candidate, polls showed him as trailing Hillary.  Why would the Russians support such as dark horse? And, exactly what did they do to support him?   

The Russians are masters of disruption and have been since the days of the czars.  Whatever interference they've done was to sow chaos in the US body politic. They're doing so in the Ukraine, now.  Recently, their presence was found in a number of EU nations.  Democrats are serving their traditional role as useful idiots assisting the Russians in their campaign of disruption.

The former CIA director, Clapper, stated there was no evidence of Trump colluding with the Russians.  The FBI and NSA stated the same. 

Last edited by direstraits

good ole dire.. you can count on him to ignore plain black and white facts to deflect to venezuela, benghazi, hillary or obama.... or anything else the 'alternative facts' point to for the republicans.

but, i expect no less from the lying hypocritical republicans. after all, trump's golf and vacationing have ZERO outrage from the very people who were so outraged over obama's vacationing and golf... just one of at least a dozen examples of how a few short months have changed the hypocrites.. oops, republicans.

Last edited by Crash.Override
direstraits posted:
The FBI is conducting a counter intelligence investigation, which is not considered criminal in nature.  But, rather to determine if the Russians were involved in an effort to disrupt the election. 
 

Only the Democrats are claiming that Trump colluded with the Russians. I remember the John Birchers attempting to prove Eisenhower assisted the Soviets.  The Dems are now in the same arena of stupid.

   once again. the republicans hear what they want to hear and it has little to do with facts... but now, alternative facts.. they got those covered. FBI director comey said flat out they were investigating collusion between trump's campaign and russia.. 

The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, took the extraordinary step on Monday of announcing that the agency is investigating whether members of President Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election.

Mr. Comey’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee created a treacherous political moment for Mr. Trump, who has insisted that “Russia is fake news” that was cooked up by his political opponents to undermine his presidency. Mr. Comey placed a criminal investigation at the doorstep of the White House and said officers would pursue it “no matter how long that takes.”

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...ssia-comey.html?_r=0

Last edited by Crash.Override
Crash.Override posted:

good ole dire.. you can count on him to ignore plain black and white facts to deflect to venezuela, benghazi, hillary or obama.... or anything else the 'alternative facts' point to for the republicans.

but, i expect no less from the lying hypocritical republicans. after all, trump's golf and vacationing have ZERO outrage from the very people who were so outraged over obama's vacationing and golf... just one of at least a dozen examples of how a few short months have changed the hypocrites.. oops, republicans.

Your deflection shield is on.

Crash.Override posted:
direstraits posted:
The FBI is conducting a counter intelligence investigation, which is not considered criminal in nature.  But, rather to determine if the Russians were involved in an effort to disrupt the election. 
 

Only the Democrats are claiming that Trump colluded with the Russians. I remember the John Birchers attempting to prove Eisenhower assisted the Soviets.  The Dems are now in the same arena of stupid.

   once again. the republicans hear what they want to hear and it has little to do with facts... but now, alternative facts.. they got those covered. FBI director comey said flat out they were investigating collusion between trump's campaign and russia.. 

The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, took the extraordinary step on Monday of announcing that the agency is investigating whether members of President Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election.

Mr. Comey’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee created a treacherous political moment for Mr. Trump, who has insisted that “Russia is fake news” that was cooked up by his political opponents to undermine his presidency. Mr. Comey placed a criminal investigation at the doorstep of the White House and said officers would pursue it “no matter how long that takes.”

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...ssia-comey.html?_r=0

You should have gone to the linked site with Comey's actual statement, rather than the NY Times take on it.

"The hearing’s featured witnesses: Mr. Comey and Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency.

Comey confirms the F.B.I. is investigating Russian election interference.

The F.B.I. is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible links between the Trump campaign and the Russian government — and whether there was any coordination, Mr. Comey said.

Mr. Comey said that it was unusual for the F.B.I. to confirm or deny the existence of any investigations, but that in unusual circumstances when it is in the public interest, the bureau will sometimes discuss such matters.

The F.B.I., as part of our counterintelligence effort, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 president election,” he continued, adding that the investigation included looking at whether associates of Mr. Trump were in contact with Russian officials, and whether they colluded with them."

Not a criminal investigation, like I stated.

“[The FBI is] investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts,” Comey said.

 

from your own article. hahahahahaha! that would produce a criminal charge.. i don't care how much 'alternative facts' you throw at this.. the FBI is investigating the current potus for treasonous acts.

 

Last edited by Crash.Override
Crash.Override posted:

“[The FBI is] investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts,” Comey said.

 

from your own article. hahahahahaha! that would produce a criminal charge.. i don't care how much 'alternative facts' you throw at this.. the FBI is investigating the current potus for treasonous acts.

 

I will type slowly and use easy words, so Crash might understand me.  First, remember I am familiar with fraud cases, to include at the federal level.  The FBI will perform the counter intelligence investigation to determine if a crime was committed.  Only, after the FBI determines if a crime was committed can they began a criminal investigation. During a criminal investigation they will attempt to determine who committed a crime.  Got that?  First determine if a crime was committed before performing a criminal investigation?  Hopefully, Crash is not so thick as to understand the difference. But, then, again...?

direstraits posted:
Crash.Override posted:

“[The FBI is] investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts,” Comey said.

 

from your own article. hahahahahaha! that would produce a criminal charge.. i don't care how much 'alternative facts' you throw at this.. the FBI is investigating the current potus for treasonous acts.

 

I will type slowly and use easy words, so Crash might understand me.  First, remember I am familiar with fraud cases, to include at the federal level.  The FBI will perform the counter intelligence investigation to determine if a crime was committed.  Only, after the FBI determines if a crime was committed can they began a criminal investigation. During a criminal investigation they will attempt to determine who committed a crime.  Got that?  First determine if a crime was committed before performing a criminal investigation?  Hopefully, Crash is not so thick as to understand the difference. But, then, again...?

maybe you can admit it today, since the republicon senators are now calling this 'a criminal investigation'. ha! perhaps you were just too thick to understand what was going on?  maybe your 'familiarity with fraud cases , to include at the federal level' was just blinding you to the facts? maybe you were just being unamerican and supporting the america hating republicons?

i've seen two republicon senators, today, say 'this is now a criminal investigation'.

Crash, you didn't disappoint.   You did another sound bite and left out the why as if no one else is going to watch the vid.  But you do know now why Graham was concerned about this "maybe" turning into a criminal investigation, don't you?  I know you can't say it, but yeah.

Had nothing to do with any evidence but his concern that a mislead investigation would impact Congressional hearings abilities to subpoena witnesses?  You got that, right?

Quite a frenzy y'all are working up.

You guys stocked up on frozen water bottles and gas masks?

One of these days, y'all are going to hit the wrong 'hood, bro.

 

Last edited by budsfarm
Crash.Override posted:

trumpites wouldn't believe anyone no matter what.. and if trump admitted it on national television, your reply would be 'well, that's not what he meant to say'. you're hung up on hillary.. you can't see the forest for the trees. one day, the hood is gonna hit you. ha!

No Trumpite.  Just a regular guy who voted against a liar and for blue collar jobs.  If I seem to be hung up on Hillary, I hate to see criminals in the face of overwhelming evidence set forth go free.  Any criminal.  Any party.   Any time.  Just show me the evidence and save me the drama.

Ha is all you got, Crash.  No worries about getting hit by you or your 'hood thugs.  Y'alls tactic is to prey upon the weak and defenseless.  None around here.

Be cool.

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×