Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I might consider the vote on Healthcare as a valid failure, on his part, failure to get his party to go along with it but selecting the travel bans is not Trump's failure but a GROSS Unconstitutional FAILURE of our Judicial system.  What Trump did was constitutional and legal but as President he must follow the rules and abide by the Constitution himself and thus when a District Judge grossly over rules and makes a bad judgment it will stand will overruled, which it will be.  Trump didn't lose but rather it is more a judicial coup in effect.

As for the wall and other agenda items TIME is the issue that must be considered as "Rome wasn't built in a day" neither will the wall be.

teyates posted:

Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....

i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.

answer truthfully..

if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?

Crash.Override posted:
teyates posted:

Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....

i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.

answer truthfully..

if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?

Crash,

The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think.  He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better.  I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.

 

HIFLYER2 posted:
MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:

5.) Stated Obama wiretapped him with no proof.  Has since been rebuked by Republicans, Senate Intelligence Committee and FBI.

Uho truth is coming out that Obamas people and the NSA did eavesdrop on Trumps communications.

http://circa.com/politics/acco...-on-trump-associates

total BS, again.. the reports say the director of NSA saw reports.. well, at least she was doing her job.. next up, more rt. wingnut fake news.

teyates posted:
Crash.Override posted:
teyates posted:

Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....

i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.

answer truthfully..

if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?

Crash,

The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think.  He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better.  I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.

 

so, while hillary was under investigation the norm was 'no person under fbi investigation can govern correctly'... now,' he's doing a great job.' and all the while, more reports come out headed to the outcome of collusion between team trump and the russians.  if this were obama, you would be in vapor lock... i'm sure, from your POV, we'd be better off under putin than a democrat. that's the new republican norm... to go along side the old republican norm, hypocrisy. 

up next.. it's all obama's fault.. because, obama!

Kraven posted:
Why would anyone be proud of Van Jones, jail bird. -- EPA
Eric Holder, white hating racist. Loretta Lynch, thug.
John Kerry, idiot. When the books start to roll out about
this administration and the gang it might open some eyes.  

when the fbi reports start to roll out, i bet you'll be on here, still whining about obama and hillary.

Crash.Override posted:
teyates posted:
Crash.Override posted:
teyates posted:

Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....

i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.

answer truthfully..

if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?

Crash,

The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think.  He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better.  I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.

 

so, while hillary was under investigation the norm was 'no person under fbi investigation can govern correctly'... now,' he's doing a great job.' and all the while, more reports come out headed to the outcome of collusion between team trump and the russians.  if this were obama, you would be in vapor lock... i'm sure, from your POV, we'd be better off under putin than a democrat. that's the new republican norm... to go along side the old republican norm, hypocrisy. 

up next.. it's all obama's fault.. because, obama!

I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time.  At least with him you know where you stand. 

teyates posted:
Crash.Override posted:
teyates posted:
Crash.Override posted:
teyates posted:

Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....

i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.

answer truthfully..

if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?

Crash,

The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think.  He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better.  I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.

 

so, while hillary was under investigation the norm was 'no person under fbi investigation can govern correctly'... now,' he's doing a great job.' and all the while, more reports come out headed to the outcome of collusion between team trump and the russians.  if this were obama, you would be in vapor lock... i'm sure, from your POV, we'd be better off under putin than a democrat. that's the new republican norm... to go along side the old republican norm, hypocrisy. 

up next.. it's all obama's fault.. because, obama!

I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time.  At least with him you know where you stand. 

I perfer the Russians over the Muslims.

Running Tally of Trump's Failures Thus Far

Trump hasn't failed so far, digging the government healthcare
scam out of the government where it never belonged in the first
place will happen, it just takes time plus needs to be read before
it can be voted for passage. Trump has already accomplished
more than barry ever thought about in eight years.
 
teyates posted:

I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time.  At least with him you know where you stand.

 

i just wanted to make sure i could find this again, later... thanks for admitting it. now, we all know where you stand. russians good, liberals bad. got it.

Crash.Override posted:
 
teyates posted:

I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time.  At least with him you know where you stand.

 

i just wanted to make sure i could find this again, later... thanks for admitting it. now, we all know where you stand. russians good, liberals bad. got it.

You don't have to find it. I will be happy to tell it to you any time you ask. I have sat with Russians and talked to them. I had dinner and vodka with them under the wing of B52 in the Air Force Museum in Dayton Ohio.  I have friends in Russia.  They are a heck of lot less "communistic" than the current leftist leaning Democratic party. If Hillary Clinton had her way, the days of Joseph Stalin would look like a birthday party. The only difference in Putin and Hillary is that Putin doesn't try to hide his bad attributes behind a fake smile and a dress. I would rather drink a gallon of Mexican tap water than to be locked in a closet with Hillary,

 

Crash.Override posted:

and finally one rt. wingnut admits it.... giving america to the russians is better than letting a democrat be president. let that sink in for a minute.  because of the rt. wingnut 'alternative facts' believed by the republicans, hillary would be a worse leader for america than putin. just wow.

No, just the opposite....there you have it....Liberals had rather run us into the dirt than to open their eyes and see that continuing to do the same thing over and over again is simple idiocy. Hillary Clinton is a recycled version of the same Democratic crap that has circulated for the past 15 years. The only thing that Liberal democrats are concerned with is redistribution of wealth. You don't care if this country has any defense. You don't care if business continue to flee to foreign countries, while foreigners flee here for more freebies. You simple want bigger government, and higher taxes for everyone but yourselves.  you sit around on Saturday mornings, and at the barber shop, blaming all of your problems on some fictious "man" who is holding you down, and keep you from being rich.  You blame the "rich", but cannot define them.  your simple definition of "rich" is someone who make a dollar more than yourself.  You have been blinded by greed and coveting for your "neighbors". Rather than being satisfied with what you have, you want more as long as it comes out of someone else's pocket. After having seen the Russians up close and talking to them I see people who are not of the same mentality. If Putin had rather fight ISIS than dig in my pockets, yeah I would rather have him at the helm.  It is not about giving the country away to Russia, it is about stopping it from becoming a failed socialist experiment like Venezuela.

teyates posted:
Crash.Override posted:

and finally one rt. wingnut admits it.... giving america to the russians is better than letting a democrat be president. let that sink in for a minute.  because of the rt. wingnut 'alternative facts' believed by the republicans, hillary would be a worse leader for america than putin. just wow.

No, just the opposite....there you have it....Liberals had rather run us into the dirt than to open their eyes and see that continuing to do the same thing over and over again is simple idiocy. Hillary Clinton is a recycled version of the same Democratic crap that has circulated for the past 15 years. The only thing that Liberal democrats are concerned with is redistribution of wealth. You don't care if this country has any defense. You don't care if business continue to flee to foreign countries, while foreigners flee here for more freebies. You simple want bigger government, and higher taxes for everyone but yourselves.  you sit around on Saturday mornings, and at the barber shop, blaming all of your problems on some fictious "man" who is holding you down, and keep you from being rich.  You blame the "rich", but cannot define them.  your simple definition of "rich" is someone who make a dollar more than yourself.  You have been blinded by greed and coveting for your "neighbors". Rather than being satisfied with what you have, you want more as long as it comes out of someone else's pocket. After having seen the Russians up close and talking to them I see people who are not of the same mentality. If Putin had rather fight ISIS than dig in my pockets, yeah I would rather have him at the helm.  It is not about giving the country away to Russia, it is about stopping it from becoming a failed socialist experiment like Venezuela.

Crash, read your post again and then read the teyates post for
the first time and if you're still confused I'll buy you a one way
ticket to Venezuela.

what's to be confused about? putin good. hillary bad. republicans idiots. not much to be confused about.

neither of you have a clue about my 'social status' or 'economic status'... yet, you both think i'm only out for what i can get from the system... that's hilarious to anyone that knows me. trust me, i'm not jealous of anything anyone else has... i have all i need. more rt. wingnut babble and still not a clue what you're talking about... more rt. wingnut BS and talking points. not one fact in either post. period.

Last edited by Crash.Override

And you don't know squat about anyone else on here, yet you continue to label us "wingnuts" because it makes you feel better about your ideals. I am not concerned what you pay in taxes, nor you economic status.  If you NEED help I am more than willing to help you out, but to take from one group to give to another simply based upon their race or sex, or sexual preferences, is a plan hatched in depths of socialist Hell.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×