Skip to main content

Jeff Bezos' personal blog, the Washington Post admits it got the drummer's veteran's status wrong.   That's about a 100 percent error rate for the entire story.

Wonder is the soon to be ex-Mrs. Bezos will be the new owner? 

"The Washington Post has issued a major correction to its story detailing the heavily reported back-and-forth between Native American leftist activist Nathan Phillips and the Catholic school teenagers he approached in Washington, D.C., over the weekend. 

Countless legacy media outlets and media personalities have described Phillips as a “Vietnam War veteran” or a variation of the phrase to describe a veteran who fought in the Vietnam War. We now know Phillips served in the military but not on a foreign battlefield.

They all turned out to be incorrect. In a massive correction Tuesday, the Washington Post reports that Phillips served in the Marines but “was never deployed in Vietnam.” Before correction, the Washington Post story claimed he had “fought in the Vietnam War.”

Some outlets appear to be engaged in full damage-control mode, while others that reported the fake news about Phillips have failed to correct their stories.

The New York Times incorrectly describes him as a “Native American veteran of the Vietnam War.” 

https://www.conservativereview...-in-the-vietnam-war/

TRUTH -- THE NEW HATE SPEECH!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

As a Nam vet, myself, I've seen too many fakes. I remember the reports of so many homeless Vietnam vets in the 1980s.  A study was made that revealed that 80 percent of those claiming to be Nam vets never served and 10 percent did serve, but not in Nam.  Only 10 percent of those claiming to be Vietnam vets were the real thing. 

Dr. John posted:

Whoa, padnahs. Before you crucify Phillips, he didn't say he served in Vietnam. He said he served in that time frame. That's more than most. More than those little P****s,

Now, Kraven, apologize like a good little boy.

He's an agent provocateur.  I've posted three times he was involved with such. I'll post another, shortly.  Question is: did he coordinate with the Black Hebrew Israelites to incite the incident?  There are a phalanx of civil suit lawyers that may be asking that question.  Dr. John, take off your high hat, and consider -- you cursed out a number of kids -- kids, who's only crime was waiting for their bus.

Remember your history, most lynch mobs were led by Democrats. 

 

Last edited by direstraits
direstraits posted:
Dr. John posted:

Whoa, padnahs. Before you crucify Phillips, he didn't say he served in Vietnam. He said he served in that time frame. That's more than most. More than those little P****s,

Now, Kraven, apologize like a good little boy.

He's an agent provocateur.  I've posted three times he was involved with such. I'll post another, shortly.  Question is: did he coordinate with the Black Hebrew Israelites to incite the incident?  There are a phalanx of civil suit lawyers that may be asking that question.  Dr. John, take off your high hat, and consider -- you cursed out a number of kids -- kids, who's only crime was waiting for their bus.

Remember your history, most lynch mobs were led by Democrats. 

 

Explain the video of the kids harassing young women just before the incident, can you?  That kid sure is getting his money outta his PR firm. Republicans can't get enough of this kid.

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×