Skip to main content

Hi to my Forum Friends,

Recently, my Forum Friend, LSTHOMPSON, sent me a PM. Our dialogue seemed, to me, to be relevant to all of our Forum Friends; so, I asked permission to share it. This is LS's response:

Thank you so very much for taking the time to answer these questions for me. It has helped me tremendously. Feel free to post on open Religion forum or your newsletter if you desire. I only addressed this privately initially because I wanted to get serious answers and no coarse joking about the matter and I knew that you would answer appropriately.

Obviously I have some concerns about what is going on right now and the things I am beginning to witness taking place in Churches today, all in the name of God. Unbelievers can't help but be confused. Again, I appreciate your help and continue to spread the Word as you are doing. I pray that you will feel better soon. May God continue to Bless you.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hi LS,

Thank you for your feedback and letting me know that there are folks like you who do find value in the writings we post on the Religion Forum. As you well know, many of the public responses tend to be more in the form of "thrown rocks" than in responses of encouragement, such as yours. Again, thank you.

I apologize for taking several days to respond. While I consider the posts on the open Forum to be important; I consider those questions sent via PMs to be of much higher importance since they are usually questions or thoughts which are heavy on a person's mind. Because of this, I feel more comfortable taking a wee bit longer to make sure that I have given the very best answer possible. Sometimes, such as in this instance, you may send a PM and not get a fast reply -- yet, still see me posting responses on the open Forum. This is because I do consider your PM questions to be of much higher importance and want to take more time to make sure I respond appropriately.

I have been sick for the past week and a half. I missed Bible study last Friday and will miss it again tonight because of this. The bad part about me missing Bible study -- is that I am the study leader. Sort of like the guy who kept telling his wife he did not feel like going to church -- and she kept telling him that he had to go to church. Finally, in frustration, he cried out, "Why?" -- and she sweetly replied, "Because you are the pastor."

LS, you ask me, "Good evening, Mr. Gray, I have been a faithful reader on the Religion Forum for some time now and I truly enjoy and am quite enlighten by a lot of your posts, as well as inspired. We seem to agree on a lot of subjects. But I have this dilemma and am searching for a true answer and you seem to be quite knowledgeable of the Word of God so I thought I might inquire of you, if you don't mind.

I read on one of your post where you commented on the gift of speaking in unknown language, but I can't remember exactly what you said at this moment. So, do you believe that the gifts of Speaking in Tongues and Prophesying ended with the death of the apostles and -- if so, what language are the people we hear in churches today speaking and how are they doing it if God doesn't allow this gift any longer."


In the Old Testament, prophets spoke the words given them by God, i.e, they were His human messengers sent to the His people, Israel. While the Israelites had scrolls of Scripture in those days; these were usually found in the temple and in the care of temple leaders. The common folks, such as you and me, did not have their own personal Bibles like we have today. In the Old Testament, God spoke through His prophets. Today, for the most part, He speaks to us through His Written Word, the Bible.

Are some people given revelations from God today? Yes, I would say it has happened to most all Christian believers at some time or another, even though we may not recognize it as a revelation from the Holy Spirit. However, these revelations do not make us prophets. My belief is that there are no longer prophets of God such as we find in the Old Testaments.

Scripture tells us of prophets: Ephesians 4:11-12, "And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of service, to the building up of the body of Christ; until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ."

And, in 1 Corinthians 12:27-28, "Now you are Christ's body, and individually members of it. And God has appointed in the church, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, various kinds of tongues."

There is a down side to being a true prophet of God which most who call themselves "prophet" today will not address or just ignore because "that if the Old Testament." Yet, even though in much of the Old Testament God is speaking and acting upon the house of Israel -- the complete Bible is our revelation from God. If the Old Testament were to be ignored; Jesus would not have quoted it since He was here to institute the church of the New Testament.

Deuteronomy 18:20-22, "But the prophet who speaks a word presumptuously in My name which I have not commanded him to speak, or which he speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die. You may say in your heart, 'How will we know the word which the LORD has not spoken?' When a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the thing does not come about or come true, that is the thing which the LORD has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him."

In Ephesians 4:11 we are told, "And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers," Yet, we know there are no more "apostles" for we are told, in Acts 1:21-22, that to be an apostle the person must be one who walked with Jesus and the apostles. No one today can say that he walked personally with Jesus during His earthly ministry; therefore no one can be called an apostle. Paul was set aside differently because he did experience Jesus face to face and was made a special apostle by Jesus Himself on the road to Damascus. No one today can claim either of these experiences. Thus, there are no apostles today.

The same applies to the office of prophets. This was a man or woman, chosen and sent personally by God, to "speak as God has commanded him" (Deuteronomy 18:18) -- and the penalty for being wrong was death. There are no such prophets today.

In Luke 16:16, Jesus told the Pharisees, "The Law and the Prophets were proclaimed until John; since that time the Gospel of the kingdom of God has been preached, and everyone is forcing his way into it."

Jesus is telling the Pharisees, and us, that John the Baptist was the last Old Testament prophet. From that time forward, the Gospel is to be preached.

Today, in my personal opinion, we have pastors, teachers, evangelists, elders, and deacons -- but, the time of the apostles and prophets has passed. Yet, as I said earlier, we all do receive revelations from the Holy Spirit through our spirits. Those revelations can be teachings, encouragement, leading, and/or convictions when we are heading down a path God has not chosen for us.

Then, you ask, "Does the ability to have authority over the enemy and everything that Jesus stated in John 14 concerning (paraphrasing) greater works being done because He is going back to the Father -- apply only to the apostles and did that ability die with the apostles?"

Pastor David Guzik, director of Calvary Chapel Bible College, Germany, has written a good commentary note on this:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

John 14:12, "Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do he will do also; and greater works than these he will do, because I go to My Father."

a. "The works I do he will do": Jesus did not expect the disciples to disband after His departure, but to carry on the work in even greater magnitude.

b. "Greater works than these he will do": This promise seems impossible; yet after Peter's first sermon there were more converted (3000 souls) than are recorded during Jesus’ entire ministry. Greater is not "more sensational" but greater in magnitude. Jesus will leave behind a victorious, working church, not a cowering one.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So, when you ask, "Does this apply only to the apostles and did that ability die with the apostles?

No, it did not die with the apostles. If we follow Jesus' command in Matthew 28:19-20, to Go, Make disciples, Baptize them, Teach them -- and His command in Mark 16:15 and Acts 1:8, to be His witnesses in all the world -- we will be continuing the work that Jesus and the apostles began in Jerusalem on the Day of Pentecost. And, we will be doing it in greater magnitude because there are now many millions of us doing the work He has given us -- that of sharing the Gospel with the unsaved.

John 14:13-14, "And whatever you ask in My name, that I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything in My name, I will do it."

Is this our ticket for a new Rolls Royce, Mercedes, or Bentley -- our ticket to a mansion in Beverly Hills? There are Prosperity Theology pastors who will tell you that this is exactly what Jesus meant. One such pastor in Los Angeles said in his sermon, "If you do not have enough faith to drive a Rolls Royce; don't be jealous of me driving my Rolls Royce." What he neglected to say is that his Rolls Royce is paid for "by his church" -- by the people sitting in his congregation or listening on radio or television who are wondering how they will pay their rent this month, after they send their tithing to him. No, this teaching must be viewed through the lens of the entire Bible.

Pastor Chuck Smith, Calvary Chapel, Costa Mesa, California, writes in his John 13-14 (C2000 Series) Commentary:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

John 14:13-14, "And whatever you ask in My name, that I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything in My name, I will do it."

To whom is this broad promise of prayer made? To that man who first of all has denied himself. So, his prayer isn't going to be one for his own glory, for his own wealth, for his own enrichment. Jesus isn't saying here, "Just ask for a Cadillac, and I'll give you one. Ask for a Mercedes, ask anything, I'll give it to you!"

Mark 8:34, "And He summoned the crowd with His disciples, and said to them, 'If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me.'"

No. "If any man will come after me, let him deny himself." And that's the first qualification to a man who has this broad promise.

Secondly, "let him take up his cross." By that, submitting himself totally to the will of the Father. "Not my will; Thy will be done." And that man who has totally submitted his life to the will of the Father, who has denied himself, who is following Jesus Christ, he has a glorious broad promise from the Lord, "Whatsoever you ask in My name, I will do it." Because whatever I am asking will be according to the will of God, because that's what I desire to see.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Next, you ask, "This past weekend, I was in a worship experience where several members in the congregation proceeded to jump up and run around the sanctuary as example, I guess of being free; strongholds being broken, shackles loosed, and now they are free to run at ease.

Is there anything scriptural concerning this as being a way of worship? In God's Word, he says that speaking in an unknown language was for the unbeliever, so when an entire Church is speaking in tongues and there isn't an obvious interpreter and the Pastor does it as well, is this a form of false teaching and how exactly do you know if someone is a false teacher or false Prophet when everything else they do appear to be correct? I didn't say Biblically, correct because there is still a lot in the Bible I obviously have not read."


When you say, "In God's Word, he says that speaking in an unknown language was for the unbeliever. . ." -- you are referring to the Scripture passage: 1 Corinthians 14:22-23, "So then tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophecy (is for a sign), not to unbelievers but to those who believe. Therefore if the whole church assembles together and all speak in tongues, and ungifted men or unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are mad?"

I believe the point that Paul is making here is that, our main goal as Christian believers is to bring the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the unsaved world, to the non-believer. And, if we drive them away with practices they see as weird, i.e., speaking in tongues, running and dancing around the sanctuary during the worship service, etc. -- how can we be a witness to them? So, it is best to conduct ourselves in a manner which is welcoming to those non-believers and unchurched -- that we may embrace them -- that they may eventually embrace Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

You ask, "How exactly do you know if someone is a false teacher or false Prophet when everything else they do appear to be correct?"

First, you seek discernment from the Holy Spirit through prayer. Then, you do as the apostle Paul tells us of the Bereans, in Acts 17:11, ". . . examine the Scriptures daily, to see whether these things were so."

A word of advise: When you listen to false teachers, in person or on television, make a list of the Scripture verses they quote and around which they preach -- then, when you have more time, examine those verses and passages to see if what they taught was really what the Bible teaches.

An example: Some years ago, my wife and I were watching a well known Prosperity Preacher on television. He was preaching on anointing oil -- and as he preached, Scripture verses would pop up on the screen. Since he was moving much too fast for me to check each one in real time -- I wrote them down and later reviewed each verse. I found that on 8 out of 10, he was correct. But, on the other two, he totally misrepresented the meaning of Scripture in his attempt to make it fit his message.

This is common to false teachers. Six, seven, or even eight out of ten will be right on. But, once they have lulled you into believing what they are saying -- they hit you with the zinger, the false teaching, and you buy it because he has been right eight times before.

If he is teaching a message which is not 100% Biblical; he is a false teacher. Now, here I must qualify my statement. We know that many times if you have ten people reading the same Scripture passage -- you will have eleven different interpretations. A person may be teaching a Scripture passage the way he understands it, which may or may not be right -- and still not be a false teacher; only a misinformed one.

When I speak of teaching something which is obviously not the meaning of Scripture; I am referring to people such as the Prosperity Preacher in Los Angeles who teaches, "If you do not have enough faith to drive a Rolls Royce; don't be jealous of me driving my Rolls Royce." I noticed recently that this man has begun to wear a robe similar to what Roman Catholic cardinals wear; but his is green with red trim. This man is obviously exalting himself to the Pharisee level.

So, back to your questions, "How exactly do you know if someone is a false teacher?"

Prayer -- and following the advise of Acts 17:11 -- ". . .test what they teach against the full Written Word of God, the Bible."

Finally, you tell me, "These are just a few of the things I am struggling with right now and am in constant prayer concerning this, because as the days get closer to Jesus' return, those things that have an appearance of right are really wrong and wrong is really beginning to look right -- and I don't want to be misled nor mislead my family. I really appreciate any help you can present with these questions. Have a good evening!!!"

LS, I pray that the answers I have given you are sufficient. If not, I will be honored to continue our dialogue.

If you are comfortable with the idea, I can post our dialogue on the Religion Forum so that we can share our thoughts with all of our Forum Friends. But, if not, that is no problem. You posted this as a Private Message and I will always honor that. If you do feel comfortable with me sharing this on the Religion Forum and/or in my Friends Ministry eNewsletter, I can change your name to protect your privacy.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
person may be teaching a Scripture passage the way he understands it, which may or may not be right -- and still not be a false teacher; only a misinformed one.


Interesting. How do you presume to know that your understanding is correct, Mr. Gray? Have you received an answered prayer that your lashes again Catechisis and other denominations are justified? If so, in what form did this come in?
I have asked you repeatedly what your authority to decipher and speak about Scripture is, and you have repeatedly failed to answer. I am assuming that it's just an oversight on your part. Now, please tell me- have you studied at Seminary? What are your credentials??
I mean, if you are a "real" teacher, kindly tell me what denomination and what degrees in theology you hold. Thanks! Smiler
Hi VP,

If I tell you I have a Ph.D. in Theology or Divinity -- will you still argue that your Roman Catholic Catechism still trumps the Bible in authority?

Is there anything which will convince you that the Bible is the sole authority (Sola Scriptura) from God to man?

Or, will you continue to bury your head in the sands of traditions, rituals, and catechisms -- regardless of what I or anyone else says?

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROS_BIB-2_SOLE-1a
Vplee, like I, have asked you several times how you can be so judgemental in your posts? Your answers are purely subjective....your interpretations of writings....the same as all of us.....however, the difference is that you use your interpretations to judge and condemn. You have no credibility to judge and condemn, noone does.
No, nothing you can tell me would make me feel that you are any more "correct" or credible or any less flailing in this life than the rest of us. We cling to hope the best we can, but at the end of the day, we are all the same. We pray that God's mercy will endure, as He promises. Yet we continue to pray, because we CONTINUE to need God's graces. We continue to seek His forgiveness in the times we have failed to be His love for one another.
We try to avoid the occasion to sin, as this damages our friendship to Christ. He doesn't approve, I'm sure, of the division in His name.
So you can go on thinking you can spit nails at people with poor sarcasm and a condescending attitude: Believe that you are "saved" beyond reproach. Whatever.
As for me, I will put my hands, and my life in the Church, established by Christ Himself. I will continue to partake in the New Covenant,the Eucharist, so long as I am able- albeit it I will never be worthy.
I will share with you the Prayer of St. Francis. I promise it won't damage you to read. It might even enlighten you a wee bit:

ST FRANCIS PRAYER OF PEACE

Make me a channel of your peace,
Where there is hatred let me bring your love,
Where there is injury your pardon Lord,
And where there's doubt true faith in you.
Make me a channel of your peace,
Where there's despair in life, let me bring hope,
Where there is darkness, only light,
And where there's sadness, ever joy.
O Master grant that I may never seek,
So much to be consoled as to console,
To be understood as to understand,
To be loved as to love with all my soul.
Make me a channel of your peace,
It is in pardoning that we are pardoned,
In giving to all men that we receive
And in dying that we are born to eternal life.

Mr. Gray, I would really challenge you to read that prayer of St. Francis of Assisi a few times. Ask yourself if you do all of these, and if this is what you believe. I do think that it sums up our calling quite well, and would like you to call it to mind when you need inspiration.
quote:
Originally posted by barbaros45:
Vplee, like I, have asked you several times how you can be so judgemental (sic) in your posts? Your answers are purely subjective....your interpretations of writings....the same as all of us.....however, the difference is that you use your interpretations to judge and condemn. You have no credibility to judge and condemn, no one does.

Hi Barb,

You are right that NO ONE can judge you or anyone else. However, all Christian believers, once they become children of God and joint heirs with Jesus Christ -- are given marching orders by the Lord: Go, Make disciples, Baptize them, Teach them (Matthew 28:19-20) -- and be My witnesses in all the world (Mark 16:15, Acts 1:8). If we do not do this; we are not following His instructions.

However, when we witness, when we share the Gospel of Jesus Christ -- we are only sowing seeds. If you do not have fertile soil in which those seeds can grow; that is your problem. You need to do some soil preparation; a little weeding, hoeing, fertilizing, etc., to prepare your soil, i.e., your soul, to receive those seeds of salvation.

I cannot condemn anyone; you cannot condemn anyone -- everyone must, individually, believe and receive Him or deny Him.

So, when you see me on the Religion Forum, just imagine me with my bag of seeds -- tossing them here and there, trying to keep the birds from eating them, or the rocks from denying them nourishment, or the weeds from choking them. And, where do I get the seeds to refill my bag? Through prayer and from the Word of God, the Bible. You should try both; they work miracles.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Jesus-Loves-You_Honey-Bee
quote:
Originally posted by vplee123:
As for me, I will put my hands, and my life in the Church, established by Christ Himself. I will continue to partake in the New Covenant, the Eucharist, so long as I am able - albeit it I will never be worthy. I will share with you the Prayer of St. Francis. I promise it won't damage you to read. It might even enlighten you a wee bit.

Hi VP,

You have very well summed up the difference between a typical devout Roman Catholic -- and a person who is, by the grace of God, saved through faith in Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8-9). You say that you will put your life in the hands of the CHURCH. I put my life in the loving hands of GOD Himself.

Is this being presumptuous? No, not in the least; it is only following the teachings of the Bible. The CHURCH cannot save you; the CHURCH cannot give you eternal security -- as you have well exemplified when you tell us that you do not know if you will go to heaven when you die.

Then, if the CHURCH cannot give us peace with God, eternal security; then how do we attain this wonderful gift? By the grace of God -- you are saved by faith in Jesus Christ -- plus NOTHING (not even the CHURCH) else!

Yes, I have read the writings of Francis of Assisi and find them interesting. However, I will not call him Saint Francis; for he is merely a man. Therefore, I will call him Francis of Assisi, who, if by the grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ he became a believer, is a saint -- a saint like all Christian believers.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
How Did Your Church Begin?



33 A.D.
Roman Catholic Church (moved to Rome by Peter after he fled Jerusalem) was founded by God-made-man, Jesus Christ. He said: "Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it... Feed my lambs; feed My sheep" (Matt. 16:18,19; John 21:15,17). He also said: "He who is not with Me is against Me, and he who gathers not with me scatters" (Matt.12:30).

100


200


300


400


500


600


700


800
9th Century Marked The First Official Schisms Within The Church



827: Eastern Schism began by Photius of Constantinople. The primary difference in Faith at the heart of the schism was the argument over the addition of the filioque statement (Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, not just the Father) to the creed. This schism eventually healed.

900


1000
1053: Eastern Schism began by Michael Caerularius of Constantinople. The primary argument was the Latin practice of fasting on Saturday and the use of unleavened bread for the Holy Eucharist. Theses two points were more for challenging the authority of the Roman Pontif. This schism eventually healed.

1100


1200


1300
1378: Death of Pope Gregory XI on 27 March, 1378 began the Western Schism. The schism came to an end in 1417.



1400
1472: Present Schism of the Eastern Church begins with the repudiation of the Council of Florence.



1500
1517: Lutheran Church was founded by Martin Luther, a former priest of the Roman Catholic Church. This marked the beginning of the Protestant Reformation



1521: Anabaptist first appeared in Zwickau, in the present kingdom of Saxony. Initially, they were primarily against infant baptism.



1525: Schwenkfeldians were founded by Kaspar of Schwenkfeld, aulic councillor of Duke Frederick of Liegnitz and canon. At first he associated himself with Luther, but later opposed the latter in his Christology, as well as in his conception of the Eucharist, and his doctrine of justification.



1531: The Socinians and other Anti-Trinitarians attacked the fundamental doctrine of the Blessed Trinity. Chief founder of Anti-Trinitarians was Laelius Socinus, teacher of jurisprudence at Siena, and his nephew, Faustus Socinus.



1536: Mennonites founded by Menno Simons, a former Catholic priest and later an Anabaptist elder. They deny infant baptism and the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.



1534: Church of England (Anglicanism) was founded by King Henry VIII when he threw off the authority of the Pope and proclaimed himself the head of the Church in England, because the Pope refused to declare invalid his marriage with Queen Catherine.



1560: The Presbyterian denomination was begun by John Knox who was dissatisfied with Anglicanism.



1600
1608: The Baptist church was launched by John Smyth in Amsterdam, Holland.



1620: The Swiss Mennonites split into Amish or Upland Mennonites and Lowland Mennonites.



1671: Quakers were founded by John George Fox of Drayton in Leicestershire. He favored a visionary spiritualism, and found in the soul of each man a portion of the Divine intelligence. All are allowed to preach, according as the spirit incites them.



1700
1744: The Methodist church was launched by John and Charles Wesley in England.



1774: The Unitarians were founded by Theophilus Lindley in London.



1784: Episcopalian denomination was begun by Samuel Seabury who was dissatisfied with Presbyterianism.



1787: The founder of The Salvation Army is William Booth, who quit the Anglicans, and then the Methodists, and set up his own version of Christianity.



1800
1822: Mormons founded by Joseph Smith, who made his appearance with supposed revelations in 1822.



1872: The Jehovah's Witness Church was developed by Charles Russell.



1879: Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy began the Christian Scientist religion basing it upon an outright denial of Original Sin and its effects.



1896: Ballinger Booth, the son of William Booth, quit The Salvation Army and started his own church.



The Seventh-Day Adventists, the Church of Christ, The Church of the Nazarene, or any of the various Pentecostal Churches, etc. are also among the hundreds of new churches founded by men within the past 150 years or so.

1900


2000
Over 33,000 Sects "Scattered" Outside The One Church Founded By Christ




There Was Only ONE Church Founded By Christ

AND HIS CHURCH STILL LIVES TODAY



Learn About Heresy That Divides The Church Founded By Christ







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jesus Explained The Eucharist The Day After Feeding The 5000

"Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him." John 6:53-56



Jesus Gave Us The Eucharist For All Time The Night Before He Died

"While they were eating, Jesus took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and giving it to his disciples said, "Take and eat; this is my body." Then he took a cup, gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which will be shed on behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins. " Matthew 26:26-28



Today Some Cannot Accept The Gift Just As It Was In The Time Of Jesus

"'But there are some of you who do not believe.' Jesus knew from the beginning the ones who would not believe and the one who would betray him. And he said, 'For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by my Father.' As a result of this, many (of) his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him. Jesus then said to the Twelve, 'Do you also want to leave?' Simon Peter answered him, 'Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.'" John 6:64-68



Jesus Explained That Eternal Life Is Gained Through The Spirit - Not Through The Flesh

Jesus' Flesh And Blood Are Of Divine Nature (Spirit) And Not Of This World (Flesh)

"It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life." John 6:64-68



It's NOT Just Bread And Wine - It's NOT Just Crackers And Grape Juice

Jesus Gave Us The Eucharist To Nourish Us Until He Returns

Come Home To HIS Church And Accept HIS Holy Flesh And Blood



"Whoever listens to you listens to me. Whoever rejects you rejects me. And whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me." Luke 10:16





Our Catholic Search










Do Not Reject HIS Church

Do Not Reject HIM



COME HOME AND LEARN THE TRUTH












العربية 中文 Français Deutsch Italiano 日本語 한국어 Portuguese Российская Español

Automated Translation From English - Always Rely On The Church For Complete Understanding








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My objective in building this site is to spread the truth of the Christian Faith - the truth of the Catholic Faith. Many of our brothers and sisters are misinformed or have no knowledge about our Catholic Faith. If you find this site useful and informative, please provide a link. What I profess is freely available to all. Join the evangelization effort of the new millennium. All scripture references are taken from the New American Bible, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 3211 4th Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20017-1194 (202) 541-3000 - December 09, 2002 Copyright © by United States Conference of Catholic Bishops June 03, 2003 Copyright © by United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Copyright © of some material on this site is held by other parties.
Please note, to my Protestant (and other)brothers,this is not meant to "attack"or discredit your church/denominations/beliefs,in any way,
I fully respect the beliefs of all who speak here. But will not allow my faith to go without defense....
The above post (link)is a defense of the Catholic Church, which has been under attack, and (unsuccessfully) attempted to be discredited by a member of this forum.
I am a Methodist...I say this to tell you that I am not in total agreement with my Catholic friend...however, I will respect until the end
freedom to interpret..

Mr. Gray says..
[quote]Is this being presumptuous? No, not in the least; it is only following the teachings of the Bible.

Following the teachings of the Bible is the interpretation of its meaning as it applies to the individual.
Luke 6:37 is not open to interpretation....we differ only in our open reception and acceptance. Applying it to our lives as we strive to be more like Christ.

And please, do not stoop to correct my mispelling of a simple word...
Last edited by barbaros45
thank you, barbaros. You are absolutely right. I am deeply saddened by the judging and lack of acceptance on this forum.
I find it very disheartening, and the undertones are as un-Christlike as can be.
As we enter the season of Easter, on this, the Passion (Palm) Sunday, we should be coming together to commemorate His death and ressurection.Not tearing eachother down in debate. Thank you for reminding us of that.
Peace to you.
Hi VP and Barb,

So, in your view, unless everyone on the Religion Forum believes as the Roman Catholics do -- we are being "judgmental" and nasty.

Sorry, my liberal theology Friends; but, I can never believe I should pray to anyone except Jesus Christ, the ONLY mediator between God and man.

I can never say that anyone except Jesus Christ was born without sin, i.e., the only immaculate conception.

I can never look at the communion elements as anything other than unleavened bread and grape juice which are symbolic of the body and blood of Jesus Christ.

I can never say that any man, pope or otherwise is infallible. Only God is infallible.

I can never accept that traditions, rituals, and catechisms have a higher spiritual authority than the Written Word of God, the Bible.

So, if that makes me "judgmental" -- all I can say is, "Praise the Lord!"

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
No, neither of us is saying there. Barb clearly states that (s)he is Methodist.
What is offensive, Sir is your implications that you have all the "right" answers, and your condescending tone, caricatures and not-so-subltle, albeit poorly executed use of sarcasm. I would say, that you didn't read St. Francis' Prayer of Peace. I promise you, it will help you gain a better insight into what Christ wants us to be. Peaceful, loving and humble. Not arrogant, not condescending.
quote:
Originally posted by Rancid Apple:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
So, in your view, unless everyone on the Religion Forum believes as the Roman Catholics do -- we are being "judgmental" and nasty.

No, I think they are saying YOU are being judgmental and nasty. It is your way or the Hell way. Does it ever strike you as odd that so much discontent seems to follow you, Bill?

Hi Rancid,

Actually, what you say about discontent following me is true. The atheists, secularists, New Agers, and liberal theology proponents -- get all itchy when they hear the Truth of the Bible being shared. It just rubs their little bottoms raw. How dare Bill Gray come on the Religion Forum and share the real Written Word of God, the Bible?

Actually, when the TD Mods were getting ready to set up the Religion Forum and asked for suggested names; I suggested Faith and Family -- for we Christians do not have a "religion" -- we have a relationship; a personal relationship with our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

You really should try it sometimes -- such a relationship will work wonders for your personality.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
quote:
all itchy when they hear the Truth of the Bible being shared. It just rubs their little bottoms raw


No,Mr.Gray, "We" (if you consider Catholicism "liberal"....that's another debate altogether) get "itchy" when you seek to divide among believers. We get itchy when you degrade, insult, and believe that you in some way have the answers. You are a man. A sinner. Just like the rest of us. Every man is grappling with the Truth, and trying to figure his walk. Your insults and presumptions that you "know" better are what cause people to close their ears to you. Not to God, to YOU.
Hi VP,

The things I know for sure are:

1. Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior -- eternal, preexisting, and deity; He is God the Son.

2. Jesus Christ died on the cross to offer eternal salvation to ALL who will believe and receive His free gift.

3. This "free gift" of eternal salvation which Jesus Christ offers to ALL who will believe and receive it -- IS PAID IN FULL!

4. That Jesus Christ tells me that, "He who believes HAS eternal life" (John 6:47).

5. That by the grace of God, through faith in Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8-9) -- all who will believe and receive (John 1:12), all who will open the door of their heart and invite Him to come in (Revelation 3:20) -- have His promise of eternal life.

6. My Lord does not lie. Therefore, since He has promised that "he who believes HAS eternal life" -- I believe and accept this.

7. Based upon all the above: I know that I, Bill Gray, am a Christian believer, a Christ Follower -- and that I WILL (based upon His promises) spend eternity in heaven with Jesus Christ. I KNOW that I HAVE eternal security in Him; just as He promised.

These things I can say unequivocally about Bill Gray. You will have to speak for VP; neither I, nor anyone else, can do this. If you do not KNOW that you have eternal security in Jesus Christ; maybe you need to get deeper into a study of your Bible.

VP, I am not saying, and have never said -- that because you are a Roman Catholic, you are not saved. I have never said, that because Sofa is a Methodist, he/she is not saved. And, I have NEVER said that because I am a Protestant, I am saved.

NO ONE is saved based upon the church they attend. Who is saved; how are we saved?

"For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God -- not as a result of works, so that no one may boast" (Ephesians 2:8-9).

Everyone, regardless of which church one attends, who believes and receives this "free gift" -- is born again (John 3:3) and is a child of God, a Christian believer, a Christ Follower -- and HAS ETERNAL LIFE in Jesus Christ.

If this applies to you and Sofa; praise God! It is up to you whether you accept or deny His "free gift." But, you do have to lay aside your religion and accept this personal relationship He is offering.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
In Jesus' time your rhetoric would have placed you squarely in the camp of the Pharisees, emphasizing the letter, but not the spirit of the law, questioning out of fear of reprisal. Yours is not the faith of love and acceptance, rather one of intolerance and isolation. I have tried to see the good in your oratory, but it all seems so self-serving.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×