A government-issued photo ID

So beternnun? It was a worker doing their job. You won't have a problem when they're letting all the stinking illegals vote wide open, now will you? Was the worker a mind reader that knows how the old man was going to vote? What's your problem when, for now, the proper ID is required, knowing that when you demoslops get finished non-citizens will be able to vote in the open, not in secret as they have been??

Condie forgot to mention that voters were allowed to submit a provisional ballot that would be counted upon verification.  Of course, sooner or later, they will parrot the old Big Lie that very little voter fraud exists, which is in contravention with evidence to the contrary.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...-in-florida-n1811547

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the...-vote-fraud-reports/

http://www.nationalreview.com/...f-its-easy-john-fund

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...voting-concerns.html

I've got a government issued photo ID.  I get 10% discounts lots of places where Contendahh pays full price.

And the rest of the story . . .

http://www.jsonline.com/news/s...630z1-369874061.html

It's gonna be alright.

direstraits posted:

Condie forgot to mention that voters were allowed to submit a provisional ballot that would be counted upon verification.  Of course, sooner or later, they will parrot the old Big Lie that very little voter fraud exists, which is in contravention with evidence to the contrary.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...-in-florida-n1811547

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the...-vote-fraud-reports/

http://www.nationalreview.com/...f-its-easy-john-fund

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...voting-concerns.html

 

 

Another thread by him with all the facts left out.

giftedamateur posted:

direstraits posted:

Condie forgot to mention that voters were allowed to submit a provisional ballot that would be counted upon verification.  Of course, sooner or later, they will parrot the old Big Lie that very little voter fraud exists, which is in contravention with evidence to the contrary.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...-in-florida-n1811547

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the...-vote-fraud-reports/

http://www.nationalreview.com/...f-its-easy-john-fund

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...voting-concerns.html

 

 

Another thread by him with all the facts left out.

_______

I don't need four links filled with fiction to make my case. One source of the TRUTH will do:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp

Contendahh posted:

giftedamateur posted:

direstraits posted:

Condie forgot to mention that voters were allowed to submit a provisional ballot that would be counted upon verification.  Of course, sooner or later, they will parrot the old Big Lie that very little voter fraud exists, which is in contravention with evidence to the contrary.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...-in-florida-n1811547

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the...-vote-fraud-reports/

http://www.nationalreview.com/...f-its-easy-john-fund

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...voting-concerns.html

 

 

Another thread by him with all the facts left out.

_______

I don't need four links filled with fiction to make my case. One source of the TRUTH will do:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp

I gave four links to legitimate investigations that revealed significant fraud.  Condie did the equivalent of the true believer when confronted with the truth ---put his fingers in his ears, closed his eyes tight shut, sung at the top of his voice and blanked out his thinking process ---- OK, that last is SOP for him.

direstraits posted:

Contendahh posted:

giftedamateur posted:

direstraits posted:

Condie forgot to mention that voters were allowed to submit a provisional ballot that would be counted upon verification.  Of course, sooner or later, they will parrot the old Big Lie that very little voter fraud exists, which is in contravention with evidence to the contrary.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...-in-florida-n1811547

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the...-vote-fraud-reports/

http://www.nationalreview.com/...f-its-easy-john-fund

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...voting-concerns.html

 

 

Another thread by him with all the facts left out.

_______

I don't need four links filled with fiction to make my case. One source of the TRUTH will do:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp

I gave four links to legitimate investigations that revealed significant fraud.  Condie did the equivalent of the true believer when confronted with the truth ---put his fingers in his ears, closed his eyes tight shut, sung at the top of his voice and blanked out his thinking process ---- OK, that last is SOP for him.

____

You could not handle the information in the link I posted because it so strongly contradicted your take on voter fraud, so you cheaply and shallowly constructed your lame and impotent attempt at a rebuttal. Shall we expect that to become SOP for YOU?

Contendahh posted:

direstraits posted:

Contendahh posted:

giftedamateur posted:

direstraits posted:

Condie forgot to mention that voters were allowed to submit a provisional ballot that would be counted upon verification.  Of course, sooner or later, they will parrot the old Big Lie that very little voter fraud exists, which is in contravention with evidence to the contrary.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...-in-florida-n1811547

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the...-vote-fraud-reports/

http://www.nationalreview.com/...f-its-easy-john-fund

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...voting-concerns.html

 

 

Another thread by him with all the facts left out.

_______

I don't need four links filled with fiction to make my case. One source of the TRUTH will do:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp

I gave four links to legitimate investigations that revealed significant fraud.  Condie did the equivalent of the true believer when confronted with the truth ---put his fingers in his ears, closed his eyes tight shut, sung at the top of his voice and blanked out his thinking process ---- OK, that last is SOP for him.

____

You could not handle the information in the link I posted because it so strongly contradicted your take on voter fraud, so you cheaply and shallowly constructed your lame and impotent attempt at a rebuttal. Shall we expect that to become SOP for YOU?

No, I provided updated information since Snopes.  It is so obvious that when there is no check to see if fraud exists, few instances of fraud will be found.  However, I realize denial of reality is a leftist trait.