Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Franken is a bright and thoughtful candidate. His past work as a comedian does not in any way disqualify him from making a run at the Senate. He ran an intelligent, focused campaign and almost won--and might win still. All the vitriol in this string does not change any of this. You people are just a bunch of assassins!


Regardless of what he is or is not ....HE LOST
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Franken is a bright and thoughtful candidate. His past work as a comedian does not in any way disqualify him from making a run at the Senate. He ran an intelligent, focused campaign and almost won--and might win still. All the vitriol in this string does not change any of this. You people are just a bunch of assassins!


You'd probably vote for OJ. Roll Eyes
quote:
Originally posted by ahanback:
quote:
Originally posted by Zeb:
quote:
Al Franken for President 2016


If he is able to steal this one i'd think it is near certainty he'd run for President,but nothing to worry about he like Palin has no chance in hell or anywhere



This is very true!!!


Yes I'm sure you defacrats would rally all of your illegal voters, dick tracy, mary poppins, the deceased, their pets, the massive welfare state, and those people with multiple personalities who each get to vote. Its hard to battle that onslaught along with dopes like you who join them.
quote:
Originally posted by kperk:
quote:
Originally posted by ahanback:
quote:
Originally posted by Zeb:
quote:
Al Franken for President 2016


If he is able to steal this one i'd think it is near certainty he'd run for President,but nothing to worry about he like Palin has no chance in hell or anywhere



This is very true!!!


Yes I'm sure you defacrats would rally all of your illegal voters, dick tracy, mary poppins, the deceased, their pets, the massive welfare state, and those people with multiple personalities who each get to vote. Its hard to battle that onslaught along with dopes like you who join them.


Do you EVER make sense?
quote:
Originally posted by Zeb:
quote:
Al Franken for President 2016


If he is able to steal this one i'd think it is near certainty he'd run for President,but nothing to worry about he like Palin has no chance in hell or anywhere


You're right Zeb.Palin has no chance.She's never even been a community organizer.How you can compare a sack of fertilizer like Al Franken to Palin is like comparing a Chevette to a Corvette.
quote:
Originally posted by Zeb:
quote:
Originally posted by kperk:
quote:
Originally posted by ahanback:
quote:
Originally posted by Zeb:
quote:
Al Franken for President 2016


If he is able to steal this one i'd think it is near certainty he'd run for President,but nothing to worry about he like Palin has no chance in hell or anywhere



This is very true!!!


Yes I'm sure you defacrats would rally all of your illegal voters, dick tracy, mary poppins, the deceased, their pets, the massive welfare state, and those people with multiple personalities who each get to vote. Its hard to battle that onslaught along with dopes like you who join them.


Do you EVER make sense?


zeb you wouldn't know sense if it jumped up and bit you in the hind quarters! Big Grin
Franken's chances are looking very good as the vote count continues. There is not one thing wrong with a candidate's insisting that there be a careful recount when an election is very, very close. That is all Franken has done--make a claim to that which he is entitled under law. This is a nation of laws, not of men, as some on the right are prone to remind us. Well, here is one on the left, reminding those who have such scorn for Franken, that the laws are made for all and that those who invoke them are not guilty of any evil. It is those who vilify an honest candidate like Franken who are un-American and who have low regard for the law. Shame on those of you who come on here name-calling and reviling a man who is asking for no more and no less than that to which he is clearly entitled under law.
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Franken's chances are looking very good as the vote count continues. There is not one thing wrong with a candidate's insisting that there be a careful recount when an election is very, very close. That is all Franken has done--make a claim to that which he is entitled under law. This is a nation of laws, not of men, as some on the right are prone to remind us. Well, here is one on the left, reminding those who have such scorn for Franken, that the laws are made for all and that those who invoke them are not guilty of any evil. It is those who vilify an honest candidate like Franken who are un-American and who have low regard for the law. Shame on those of you who come on here name-calling and reviling a man who is asking for no more and no less than that to which he is clearly entitled under law.


His comeback has occured because his buddies chose to count ballots found in the trunks of cars and such. Typical defacrat election antics. Just like when john scary only wanted to recount ballots in the areas of Florida he did well in but didn't want to count the votes of military personel because he knew they would vote for Bush.
quote:
Originally posted by zippadeedoodah:
The same laws the dems used in 2004 to challenge absentee ballots sent in by serving military members?

Why is it the dems have chosen to protest every election since 2000? The more I hear about the dem party platform, the more it seems to resemble that of the NSDAP.


Oops zip, I didn't see your post. Looks like conservatives are the only ones who can remember ALL of the facts of past elections shennanigans.
I guess the "defacrats" will have to settle for a majority of 58 in the senate and a large majority in the house. Some of you seem to be desperate for any kind of victory, even one "up north" and so close we will never know the true vote totals.
How does it feel to be out of step with the rest of this great country?
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
geddon, I do not put much stock in material posted by persons so unlearned as not to know the difference between the possessive "your" and the contraction "you're"(shakes head). Get literate and then come back and debate with those who have at least a rudimentary familiarity with the mother tongue!


-----------------------------
***Wow, you take the cake, here are a couple of your recent posts. Explain these away, while simultaneously excoriating others mistakes--

"Easily said, but you have not offered a shred of argument to porve that anything Obama has said is drivel".

"Secondhand, you are acutely more perceptive and sensible than the regrettable henhouseprowler, who obviously has not very thoughtfully considered the solid trruth of what I posted".

"And there are far too many penal systems that offer NO rehabilitation programs for drug users, thus virtually assuring a high rate of repeated offenses and repeated inarcerations".

***You might want to reread this post of yours and take your own advice:

Posted 11 December 2008
"Uh, kperk, I don't know how far you went in matters of spelling and letter formation in the early years of your elementary school education, but please know this: The letter "d" is the one where the arc on the bottom part points to the left. The letter "b" is the one where the arc points to the right.......

The last name of the President-elect is spelled with the second of the letters discussed above, namely the "b." It is "Obama," not "Odama," as you have ignorantly rendered it.

You may feel free to continue your idiot ranting, since the First Amendment gives you the right to promote your opinions, however irrelevant and demented they might be. But perhaps your dingbat declarations will take on a nanogram of credibility if you will, henceforth, at least correctly spell the name the person you are irrationally castigating! Not that such beneficiation is likely to dissuade anyone from the obvious conclusion that you are a knee-jerk, scattershot, purveyor of drivel"!

-----------------------
***beneficiation
One entry found.





Main Entry: ben·e·fi·ci·a·tion
Pronunciation: \ˌbe-nə-ˌfi-shē-ˈā-shən\
Function: noun
: the treatment of raw material (as iron ore) to improve physical or chemical properties especially in preparation for smelting
— ben·e·fi·ci·ate \-ˈfi-shē-ˌāt\ transitive verb


***"that's all I got to say 'bout that"
Last edited by gracies old man

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×