Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Didn't read the analysis I posted, did you!

 

US News had a more detailed analysis.

 

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

All the attention being paid to the healthcare debate has sort of pushed the impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act--also known as the stimulus--off the front page.

It's a shame really, because the latest employment figures--real unemployment figures--show it is still failing to deliver as promised. According to a table put together last December by the Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee, payroll employment declined everywhere except for North Dakota and the District of Columbia in the nine months since the stimulus had been signed into law.

 

As I wrote at the time, "It is not just that the $789 billion package has not had the effect the White House promised it would; it's that it may actually have been counterproductive, actually lengthening the recession by effectively taking money out of the private economy, where it could have been used to create jobs and for investment purposes." 

 

On Friday, the committee released an updated version of that chart, which compares the White House's original projections of state-by-state job creation to the actual change in state payroll employment through February 2010 as measured by the U.S. Department of Labor. It shows that things have gone from bad to worse, with Alaska and D.C. now the only places to post job gains. 

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/...ne-from-bad-to-worse

 

 

 

Your post is Feb 2011.

 

Today is different.  Idiot.

Of Alabama's more than 4.7 million residents, 1.7 million are receiving assistance for food based on figures from the USDA. The figure has more than doubled from May 2010 to May 2011 for the state's residents.

Following a series of devastating storms, many residents received disaster assistance under the Disaster Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the USDA said. Food stamp use in the state surged from 868,813 in April to 1,762,481 in May.

 I did learn that of the (4.7/2)million adults in AlObama, 1.7million are on food stamps, or about 72% of adults.  This state is is full of indigent people. 

http://abcnews.go.com/Business...es/story?id=14231657

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

Your post is Feb 2011.

 

Today is different.  Idiot.

Of Alabama's more than 4.7 million residents, 1.7 million are receiving assistance for food based on figures from the USDA. The figure has more than doubled from May 2010 to May 2011 for the state's residents.

Following a series of devastating storms, many residents received disaster assistance under the Disaster Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the USDA said. Food stamp use in the state surged from 868,813 in April to 1,762,481 in May.

 I did learn that of the (4.7/2)million adults in AlObama, 1.7million are on food stamps, or about 72% of adults.  This state is is full of indigent people. 

http://abcnews.go.com/Business...es/story?id=14231657

Ditzy,

 

You didn't box in your youth, did you!  You're a sucker for a feint.  You previous posts to this thread indicated the large jump in food stamps/WIC was due to the economy alone.  When budsfarm pointed out that tornadoes had much to do with the sudden jump, again you denied it.  When I posted old information (on purpose) you couldn't wait to post the abc link.

 

Quoting from the link:

 

"Alabama is responsible for much of the 1.1 million increase in food stamp recipients after horrific storms tore through the area and led some residents to seek disaster relief, according to the United States Department of Agriculture"

 

Thanks for providing the proof of budsfarm's statement, which you denied.

 

I still have a few shares of the Eiffel Tower corporation for sell!

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×