Skip to main content

AMERICA’S RAGE: Where Are the Investigations into Hillary Emails, Clinton Foundation, Uranium One, AGT Intl, Obama FBI and DOJ Crimes?!?

Today Attorney General Bill Barr exonerated the Donald Trump campaign in collusion with Russian operatives during the 2016 election.

Attorney General Bill Barr stated that the Mueller Special Counsel did not find the Trump campaign colluded in Russian efforts to tamper with the 2016 election.  The Special Counsel report completely exonerated President Trump on the junk charges brought against him by a corrupt Democratic operatives inside the DOJ and FBI.

This was a devastating blow to Democrats, liberal media hacks and Deep State operatives.

But this is not enough!  For a decade now Americans have seen the Obama Administration, the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation and Obama’s Deep State FBI, DOJ and their cohorts in the Mainstream Media and Democrat Party get away with numerous crimes.

Where is the investigation into their crimes?  When will Americans receive justice?

Arguably the most corrupt President in US history, Barack Obama, got away with eight years of crimes while President.  The list goes on and on…. giving billions to Iran, giving guns to ISIS and creating a quagmire in the Middle East, bombing and overthrowing governments like Libya, destroying American healthcare with Obamacare, giving guns to Mexican cartels used to kill American border agents, lying to the American people over and over, and then spying on the opposing party’s candidate and then attempting an coup to have President Trump removed after he won the election.

Hillary Clinton, Obama’s Secretary of State, helped bomb Libya for no good reason and bragged about the murder of it’s leader –

Bill and Hillary also created the Clinton Foundation which is probably the most corrupt entity in US and world history.  Corporations like Uranium One and AGT International donated millions to the Clintons who in turn promoted these organizations.  As a result 20% of US uranium went to Russia (Uranium One) and some of the US’s most advanced defense technology went to Russia and China (AGT International).

Rudy Giuliani stated years ago that the Clinton Foundation ‘is a fraud’ and should be investigated as a racketeering enterprise –

Where are the investigations into Obama and the Clintons?  The level of anger from good Americans for not seeing any justice regarding the former corrupt President and his corrupt Secretary of State is at record heights.

SEE FULL STORY---VIDEO

https://www.thegatewaypundit.c...-fbi-and-doj-crimes/

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I wonder what it took to arrange that "accidental" meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton. The meeting they had where they say they discussed grandkids....which neither has. Web Hubbell did all the heavy lifting to get Chelsea...and Lynch never had kids either.

*********************

Awkward Encounters: Clinton and Lynch Weren’t Talking Grandkids and Golf

She’s going with 'The Axelrodian Optics Gambit'

Finding a more obvious case of active political conniving than the Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Phoenix Airplane Chat (PAC) is pretty darn tough. Think about it,  the meet-up was a PAC, a political action conference—or conniving, my preferred word. At the moment the Lynch-Clinton confab remains a truly opaque PAC. Where’s Lois Lerner’s IRS?

The Lynch-Clinton airplane chat is now an exploding story of national impact, and deservedly so. Bill Clinton’s involvement is a sensational hook even the intentionally reluctant mainstream media cannot resist. Let’s praise the local Phoenix journalists who reported it on June 29, in particular ABC-15 reporter Christopher Sign.

The ABC-15 report notes, in clear, unadorned, direct, un-spun language: “The private meeting comes as Lynch’s office is in charge of the ongoing investigation and potential charges involving Clinton’s email server.”

Unfortunately I’ve noticed some of the big media suspects continue to employ the language of reluctance and discretion.

The following USA Today report is by no means the worst. The overall report gets to the facts and doesn’t obscure them. But dig the description in the lead: “Attorney General Loretta Lynch faced continuing questions Thursday related to an awkward encounter with former president Bill Clinton after the two crossed paths Monday at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport.”

The Daily Caller News Foundation asks if the Lynch-Clinton confab was a plea-bargaining session, with Clinton begging on behalf of himself, not Clinton.

Awkward Encounter. That’s not even a softball—that’s a mushball—and feeds the impression that “hard-hitting journalism” is gritty, tough coverage reserved for slamming Republicans. Intended or not, “Awkward Encounter” serves as a political heat dissipater, certainly more so than this much more accurate description: “a highly questionable meeting given Ms. Lynch’s position as US Attorney General and the current legal circumstances facing Mr. and Ms. Clinton.” That’s just a version of ABC-15’s fine initial report.

The article includes this quote by Lynch:

“I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as I was leaving, and he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,” Lynch told reporters. “Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren. It was primarily social and about our travels.”

“Primarily.” Another wiggle word, though Lynch has also denied she discussed Hillary Clinton’s national security crime with the suspect’s husband, former President Clinton.

As Senator John Cornyn noted in a press release quoted by USA TODAY, an attorney cannot represent two parties in a dispute and must avoid even the appearance of conflict.”

Someone somewhere really does believe former President Clinton and Attorney General Lynch merely discussed grandchildren and golf while sitting in an airplane in backing 100-degree plus heat. But the Lynch-Clinton PAC is bothering Democrats. Still, David Axelrod wants to dismiss it as “foolish optics.”

Foolish optics? Such an awkward statement there, David. Indicatively corrupt, David, those are the words you were avoiding, David.

Here’s some more indicative slipperiness. The State Department—with muscle provided by Lynch’s Department of Justice—is not releasing Hillary Clinton’s records relating to “correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a closely allied public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.” The DOJ wants a judge to delay discovery by 27 months.

Little wonder Judicial Watch, the watchdog organization involved in the lawsuit, is asking for a DOJ Inspector General to investigate the Phoenix Airplane Chat.

The Daily Caller news foundation asks if the Lynch-Clinton confab was a plea-bargaining session, with Clinton begging on behalf of himself, not Clinton. The thinking goes like this: The FBI (which works for Attorney General Lynch) discovers evidence of Clinton Foundation corruption, say, the selling of political appointments to Foundation donors.

 

At the minimum the FBI would solicit Bill Clinton’s testimony—if not demand it with a subpoena. Fair bet former US Attorney Joseph DiGenova had this scenario in mind or one like when he told the Daily Caller that he believes Bill Clinton “is at least a witness in two criminal investigations, probably a subject in two criminal investigations. He is a person of interest officially to the Department of Justice.”

Lynch just told reporters in Colorado she will not recuse herself from the investigation into Hillary Clinton.

However, she once again swore she will follow the FBI’s recommendations regarding the investigation. Lynch now says she wouldn’t do it again because “No matter how I viewed it, I understand how people view it.”

She’s going with The Axelrodian Optics Gambit.

Why in the hell did you do it in the first place, Lynch? You really haven’t answered that. Are you being clever? Are you trying to get the Republicans to demand a special prosecutor?

The calls are out there.

I called for one in February. However, several commentators argue that at this point in time appointing a special prosecutor would delay the FBI investigation report until after the election. The special prosecutor team would need time to organize and build its case. How convenient. Perhaps too clever by half.

Occam’s Razor suggests the Lynch-Clinton conference was a complete, unapologetic abuse of government power where party and personal interest trampled the rule of law. Remember that next time you hear the Democrats call an opponent a fascist, which, these days, roughly translates as an imperious abuser of power the Left doesn’t like.

 

 Image result for 'The Axelrodian Optics Gambit'Related image

Last edited by Jutu

it isn't going to happen,,, DC is corrupt,, which includes democrats, Dept. of justice, members of FBI, and sadly some of elected republicans.  Trump is pert neer alone in DC.   We all say Sessions talk and talk then be put in position to do something and did nothing.  Only way is to vote them all out.   Sadly FOX is moving to the left.  Soon there may not be any right side broadcast unless one goes to internet.

Jutu posted:

I wonder what it took to arrange that "accidental" meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton. The meeting they had where they say they discussed grandkids....which neither has. Web Hubbell did all the heavy lifting to get Chelsea...and Lynch never had kids either.

*********************

Jutu, you mention that libelous tale every chance you get. Why? I didn't vote for Hillary and I've never voted for Bill. There are plenty of criticisms for each of them, legitimate criticisms, without your telling false tales about their personal lives. Even if it was true, what difference does it make? Bill raised his daughter-she's his, period. So, yes, he has grandchildren!

You also frequently comment on people's personal appearance. Does that make you feel better about yourself? It certainly doesn't lead anyone to believe that you have a legitimate thought in your head or that you even qualify as a decent human being.

"I wonder what it took to arrange that "accidental" meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton. The meeting they had where they say they discussed grandkids....which neither has. Web Hubbell did all the heavy lifting to get Chelsea...and Lynch never had kids either".

Can you imagine what Hillary thought when it became clear that Chelsea was going to look just like Web Hubbell? Gennifer Flowers, Bill's mistress for 12 years, said Bill was sterile. He most likely knew from the beginning who Chelsea's dad was and thought they'd slide it by folks, but try as they might there was no way they could pass her off as his. Not even the plastic surgery Chelsea had could take away a bit of the resemblance she has of her real dad Web.

Well "doc" you are the last one that should be telling others how to post. Take care of your own business and your nasty posts to people....both in your new name and your other past IDs. Find somebody interested in arguing with you about nothing. I'm not. Maybe you can give your little speech to your pals. As for me...I will post what I want to post...when I want to post it...about who I want to post it...and as long as it is not to or about you, you can keep your trap shut. A legitimate thought in your head would die of loneliness. As far as a decent human being...I am more of one than you could ever hope to be.

Last edited by Jutu
giftedamateur posted:

"I wonder what it took to arrange that "accidental" meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton. The meeting they had where they say they discussed grandkids....which neither has. Web Hubbell did all the heavy lifting to get Chelsea...and Lynch never had kids either".

Can you imagine what Hillary thought when it became clear that Chelsea was going to look just like Web Hubbell? Gennifer Flowers, Bill's mistress for 12 years, said Bill was sterile. He most likely knew from the beginning who Chelsea's dad was and thought they'd slide it by folks, but try as they might there was no way they could pass her off as his. Not even the plastic surgery Chelsea had could take away a bit of the resemblance she has of her real dad Web.

Chelsea "Clinton" and Rebecca Hubbell

 

Jutu posted:

Well "doc" you are the last one that should be telling others how to post. Take care of your own business and your nasty posts to people....both in your new name and your other past IDs. Find somebody interested in arguing with you about nothing. I'm not. Maybe you can give your little speech to your pals. As for me...I will post what I want to post...when I want to post it...about who I want to post it...and as long as it is not to or about you, you can keep your trap shut. A legitimate thought in your head would die of loneliness. As far as a decent human being...I am more of one than you could ever hope to be.

Could you give an example of that? As in what I've said here that makes me a worse person than you?

giftedamateur posted:

"I wonder what it took to arrange that "accidental" meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton. The meeting they had where they say they discussed grandkids....which neither has. Web Hubbell did all the heavy lifting to get Chelsea...and Lynch never had kids either".

Can you imagine what Hillary thought when it became clear that Chelsea was going to look just like Web Hubbell? Gennifer Flowers, Bill's mistress for 12 years, said Bill was sterile. He most likely knew from the beginning who Chelsea's dad was and thought they'd slide it by folks, but try as they might there was no way they could pass her off as his. Not even the plastic surgery Chelsea had could take away a bit of the resemblance she has of her real dad Web.

Who does Chelsea look like? On left is mother Dorothy Rodham. In middle is daughter Hillary Rodham Clinton. On right is granddaughter Chelsea Clinton. Most of Chelsea's genes seem to come from the maternal line, but the photo does show a marked resemblance to Bill who also has curly hair.

Gifted, you might want to look up the word "real."

 ROGER STONE: Now Chelsea, their daughter, who is, as I say in this book [The Clintons’ War on Women], actually the daughter of Webb Hubbell and Hillary Clinton -- you can see this based on a series of photographs. Hillary admits in her own book that a large football player-sized man taught her the proper way to hold a baby. Who could that be? And if you look at her, she doesn’t look anything like Bill. She looks just like her daddy, despite four plastic surgeries, the youngest one when she’s only 18. What 18-year-old gets plastic surgery unless you’re trying to, I don’t know, thin out the lips and make you look less like your daddy.

https://www.mediamatters.org/v...r-real-father/212568

Last edited by Jack Hammer
Jack Hammer posted:

 ROGER STONE: Now Chelsea, their daughter, who is, as I say in this book [The Clintons’ War on Women], actually the daughter of Webb Hubbell and Hillary Clinton -- you can see this based on a series of photographs. Hillary admits in her own book that a large football player-sized man taught her the proper way to hold a baby. Who could that be? And if you look at her, she doesn’t look anything like Bill. She looks just like her daddy, despite four plastic surgeries, the youngest one when she’s only 18. What 18-year-old gets plastic surgery unless you’re trying to, I don’t know, thin out the lips and make you look less like your daddy.

https://www.mediamatters.org/v...r-real-father/212568

I think the real father of Chelsea falls under the "worst kept secret" in the country. Yes, there must have been some clenching of body parts when it became apparent that Chelsea was going to look just like her father Web Hubbell!!

Last edited by Jutu
Jutu posted:
Jack Hammer posted:

 ROGER STONE: Now Chelsea, their daughter, who is, as I say in this book [The Clintons’ War on Women], actually the daughter of Webb Hubbell and Hillary Clinton -- you can see this based on a series of photographs. Hillary admits in her own book that a large football player-sized man taught her the proper way to hold a baby. Who could that be? And if you look at her, she doesn’t look anything like Bill. She looks just like her daddy, despite four plastic surgeries, the youngest one when she’s only 18. What 18-year-old gets plastic surgery unless you’re trying to, I don’t know, thin out the lips and make you look less like your daddy.

https://www.mediamatters.org/v...r-real-father/212568

I think the real father of Chelsea falls under the "worst kept secret" in the country. Yes, there must have been some clenching of body parts when it became apparent that Chelsea was going to look just like her father Web Hubbell!!

You really cornered the market on ignorant, didn't you.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×