As long as it's the lesbians free speech that is. A columnist said something that hurt a lesbian's feelings and now the lesbian wants the paper to take away the journalist's column. Yep jt, the demoslops are the party that wants to protect free speech. THIS is the demoslop way when they are peeved at someone, they cry for total ruination of that person. BTW, the lesbian looked ridiculous.
==============================
Replies sorted oldest to newest
really? who cares what someone wears(as long as they are covered)? if you want to look bad it is your choice.
Bestworking posted:As long as it's the lesbians free speech that is. A columnist said something that hurt a lesbian's feelings and now the lesbian wants the paper to take away the journalist's column. Yep jt, the demoslops are the party that wants to protect free speech. THIS is the demoslop way when they are peeved at someone, they cry for total ruination of that person. BTW, the lesbian looked ridiculous.
==============================
which i've seen best do, 'cry for total ruination of that person'... for any 'demoslop' she posts about.... as i said 'the party of hypocrisy just keeps on giving'.
Is the one that commented gay? I ask because gay people are the worse for going after the way people dress. If she's not gay that could be why the outrage, because making fun of people is the right only they have. The gay men are the worse at that. She did look goofy, but so do most of the ones called celebrities today.
giftedamateur posted:Is the one that commented gay? I ask because gay people are the worse for going after the way people dress. If she's not gay that could be why the outrage, because making fun of people is the right only they have. The gay men are the worse at that. She did look goofy, but so do most of the ones called celebrities today.
Since so many outed themselves, it destroyed the myth they were all superfit and dressed well. Seen some real slobs.
Matt Lauer's recent forum with Hillary and Trump was an excellent example of the tolerant left. I've always considered Lauer a rather decent journo, although liberal like most of the MSM. Because Matt supposedly treated Trump easy and was hard on Hillary, the left took after him like pack of jackals fighting over a dead thing. The more moderate wanted him fired. The more extreme wanted him gutted and set afire. While nasty, it was an excellent example of the left cannibalizing their own, when they perceive a deviation from holy script.
TODAY show staffers are livid that Matt Lauer refused to take a pay cut out of his $25 million contract, to prevent layoffs at the beleaguered morning news program, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.
Last week, nine TODAY staffers were given pink slips, and more are expected to be canned in the next several months, as the show continues its ratings decline.
PHOTOS: A Look Back At 2012′s Morning Show War
Lauer “refused to take a pay cut to avoid the layoffs. Matt blames bad management for TODAY’s rating woes,” a source told Radar exclusively . “It has really irked the staff because Matt is the highest paid journalist in the business, and he only works four days a week! If he had agreed to a one percent pay cut, those jobs could have been saved.”
============
matt the liberal, it's always someone else's fault.
Sounds like another demoslop that said he wouldn't turn down pay to give another person a job even if he didn't need the money.
1130 posted:really? who cares what someone wears(as long as they are covered)? if you want to look bad it is your choice.
A comment like "who cares" is the most that should have happened. Calling for her to lose her column is the crybaby vindictive lefty way.
I'll give Jay Leno credit, he took a pay cut, plus paid for some employees out of his own pocket to keep most of his show's staff employed. Of course, he wasn't a reporter.
