Skip to main content

Joe Miller filed a lawsuit seeking to disenfranchise write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski’s voters who misspelled Murkowski’s name. In an amusing twist, Miller’s lawsuit was originally assigned to one of his former supervisors, a federal judge with a pretty low opinion of Joe Miller:

The federal judge originally assigned to hear Joe Miller’s lawsuit to challenge how write-in ballots are counted took himself off the case Wednesday because of the “negative opinion” he held of Miller. . . .
quote:

“The process for filling a part-time magistrate judge position is lengthy, a fact well known to Mr. Miller because he had gone through that process,” [Judge John] Sedwick wrote in an order from his chambers. “Mr. Miller’s failure to give reasonable notice of his resignation left the court with no judicial officer resident in Fairbanks, and no ability to fill the vacancy for many months. This incident caused me to form a negative opinion of Mr. Miller.”


At the time, Sedwick was the chief federal judge in Alaska and Miller’s supervisor.


Perhaps it is Palin that is emulating Miller by quitting the two elected offices she was elected to serve. There has to be a logical correlation.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Perhaps it is Palin that is emulating Miller by quitting the two elected offices she was elected to serve. There has to be a logical correlation

An enigma wrapped in a riddle. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? In Palin's case I hope it wasn't a turkey, remember her interview at Thanksgiving with the turkeys being beheaded in the background??? She is absolutely HATED in Alaska, but thanks to Fox and friends she is the darling of the lower 48 who are republicans and especially the repubteacons (that is a nicer phrase Juan than the one I generally use for those who associate themselves with the tea party movement that have been shown on video with hats that had dangling tea bags) Wink
Last edited by rocky
quote:
At issue is what appears to be a specific state law requiring that write-in ballots must have "the name as it appears on the write-in declaration of candidacy of the candidate, or the last name of the candidate." There can be "no exceptions" to this requirement, the law states.


It's easy to see where he has a valid point. "No exceptions" would include misspellings.
The judge will have to decide if he will follow the exact rule of the law or voter intent.
I would suggest any reader of this post, whom wants to be accurately informed of current events, carefully research previous "information" provided by this poster, and the history of the proven inaccuracy of such posts. I would also point to the manner in which these posts are delivered, which has become "lore". There is no use in attempting to provide the original poster with accurate details.
Thank You.
Let me also suggest that anyone who actually wants to see unbiased, real opinion from anything other than Fox or one of their "outlets" always ask for PROVENANCE if not provided by any post by CAGE. He is known for his misinformation and ommission of sources used in his posts. There is no need in pointing this out to Cage, he is in a deep state of denial as to his indoctrination.

Thank you
quote:
Originally posted by rocky:
Let me also suggest that anyone who actually wants to see unbiased, real opinion from anything other than Fox or one of their "outlets" always ask for PROVENANCE if not provided by any post by CAGE. He is known for his misinformation and ommission of sources used in his posts. There is no need in pointing this out to Cage, he is in a deep state of denial as to his indoctrination.

Thank you


Quit spamming the board with the same crap over and over again. Good Lord, what are you 5 and a half?
quote:
Originally posted by rocky:
quote:
Perhaps it is Palin that is emulating Miller by quitting the two elected offices she was elected to serve. There has to be a logical correlation

An enigma wrapped in a riddle. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? In Palin's case I hope it wasn't a turkey, remember her interview at Thanksgiving with the turkeys being beheaded in the background??? She is absolutely HATED in Alaska, but thanks to Fox and friends she is the darling of the lower 48 who are republicans and especially the repubteacons (that is a nicer phrase Juan than the one I generally use for those who associate themselves with the tea party movement that have been shown on video with hats that had dangling tea bags) Wink


Wow! I guess you saw wittle Johnnie Stewart chastise the Rachel Maddow guy... Wink
Remember the original poster is the one that started this lie and never admitted it.

quote:
Originally posted by ferrellj:
quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
CAF is a Tea Party group.

Its over. Its done. Rand is one of us now. He is campaigning for 2016 already.


Are you that dumb or do you think we're that dumb? From the CAF website:
quote:
About Us
WELCOME TO THE CAMPAIGN
FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE

We live in a remarkable political moment: precarious, yet potentially transforming. At the Campaign for America’s Future, our daily work is to bring about the progressive transformation.
After three decades of conservative dominance in American politics, we Americans are threatened with economic disintegration, environmental devastation and international
isolation.

The list of failure is simply exhausting: a disastrous Iraq occupation, a destabilized Middle East and Asia, the persistent threat of terrorism, a menacing climate crisis, an insecure and dwindling energy supply, unprecedented trade deficits, unchecked global corporate power, our broken health care system, a weakened pension system and an increasingly inaccessible higher education system.

But out of the ashes of this era of conservative failure comes an historic opportunity for progressives to salvage the American Ideal and shape this young century.

That’s where we come in.

The Campaign for America’s Future is the strategy center for the progressive movement. Our goal is to forge the enduring progressive majority needed to realize the America of shared prosperity and equal opportunity that our country was meant to be.

quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
quote:
Wow! I guess you saw wittle Johnnie Stewart chastise the Rachel Maddow guy...

That was funny. Even Stewart realizes that using derogatory terms does not win you any points.


Pot(b50m,marksw59, and especially mad.bum) meet kettle. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. I have posted ad naseum WHERE the term teabagger came from (the tea party movement) didn't even use the term in my post, and frankly am tired of watching you self righteous right wing radicals post out of two sides of your hand (nearest thing I can come up with for two faced)
I will give ferrellj a break, he has calmed down the rhetoric a bit, but as for piling on Juan on this, it just shows the ignorance and refusal to face the truth, unvarnished and not sanitized by Fox and friends about this and any other subject which you can't intelligently refute. And then you have the gall to fake outrage over the term: TEABAGGER
[QUOTE]Originally posted by b50m:
You have used the term 36 times.

http://forums.timesdaily.com/e...Type=1&search=Search

It was coined sexually by MSNBC. The Tea Party people were using tea bags to represent the Boston Tea party.
But that was corrupted into a sexually deviant term by your liberal left news.[/QUOTE

Just HOW was it coined sexually by MSNBC?? Maybe by Comedy Central and every comedian on the planet, but where was an exact reference used for the term TEABAGGER as to the actual sexual act on MSNBC or the "liberal" left news (Of course there are only 7 or 8 networks as you have previously posted that are leftist liberals) Oh, and that makes 37 times I have used the term, just so you can keep count (are you cyber stalking me?) Confused
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
You have used the term 36 times.

http://forums.timesdaily.com/e...Type=1&search=Search

It was coined sexually by MSNBC. The Tea Party people were using tea bags to represent the Boston Tea party.
But that was corrupted into a sexually deviant term by your liberal left news.


Ignore him/her/it b50m. He’s obsessed with the term. He’s also obsessed with Limbaugh, Hannity, and Fox news. He/she/it brings them up often in post without rhyme or reason.
quote:
Originally posted by Jobe:
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
You have used the term 36 times.

http://forums.timesdaily.com/e...Type=1&search=Search

It was coined sexually by MSNBC. The Tea Party people were using tea bags to represent the Boston Tea party.
But that was corrupted into a sexually deviant term by your liberal left news.


Ignore him/her/it b50m. He’s obsessed with the term. He’s also obsessed with Limbaugh, Hannity, and Fox news. He/she/it brings them up often in post without rhyme or reason.


Yeah, Cage/Jobe maybe I will go away! Cool Takes a lot more than a little bashing to run me off, and I will post under ONE screenname!
quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
It was a sexual term before it was a political term. The teabaggers just were not aware of it, which is kind of sad really.


So people unaware of a disgusting term makes them 'sad'?

You are using it sexually, they were talking about Taxed Enough Already!

It's makes about as much sense as Nancy saying the party was AstroTurf.

Libs have very closed minds.
quote:
Originally posted by rocky:
quote:
Originally posted by Jobe:
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
You have used the term 36 times.

http://forums.timesdaily.com/e...Type=1&search=Search

It was coined sexually by MSNBC. The Tea Party people were using tea bags to represent the Boston Tea party.
But that was corrupted into a sexually deviant term by your liberal left news.


Ignore him/her/it b50m. He’s obsessed with the term. He’s also obsessed with Limbaugh, Hannity, and Fox news. He/she/it brings them up often in post without rhyme or reason.


Yeah, Cage/Jobe maybe I will go away! Cool Takes a lot more than a little bashing to run me off, and I will post under ONE screenname!


I don't want you to go away. Reading your posts are like seeing a big fat woman in a halter top at the fair. It's freaking disgusting, and you don't want to look, but you can't help yourself as you gaze in amazement at the pure repulsiveness of it.
quote:
Originally posted by rocky:
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
quote:
Wow! I guess you saw wittle Johnnie Stewart chastise the Rachel Maddow guy...

That was funny. Even Stewart realizes that using derogatory terms does not win you any points.


Pot(b50m,marksw59, and especially mad.bum) meet kettle. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. I have posted ad naseum WHERE the term teabagger came from (the tea party movement) didn't even use the term in my post, and frankly am tired of watching you self righteous right wing radicals post out of two sides of your hand (nearest thing I can come up with for two faced)
I will give ferrellj a break, he has calmed down the rhetoric a bit, but as for piling on Juan on this, it just shows the ignorance and refusal to face the truth, unvarnished and not sanitized by Fox and friends about this and any other subject which you can't intelligently refute. And then you have the gall to fake outrage over the term: TEABAGGER


Little Girl,
You can use my name when I tell you that you may, you got that?
quote:
Sez rocky:
Pot(b50m,marksw59, and especially mad.bum) meet kettle. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. I have posted ad naseum WHERE the term teabagger came from (the tea party movement) didn't even use the term in my post, and frankly am tired of watching you self righteous right wing radicals post out of two sides of your hand (nearest thing I can come up with for two faced)
I will give ferrellj a break, he has calmed down the rhetoric a bit, but as for piling on Juan on this, it just shows the ignorance and refusal to face the truth, unvarnished and not sanitized by Fox and friends about this and any other subject which you can't intelligently refute. And then you have the gall to fake outrage over the term: TEABAGGER


I have posted ad naseum WHERE the term teabagger came from (the tea party movement) didn't even use the term in my post,

I have posted ad naseum WHERE the term teabagger came from (the tea party movement) didn't even use the term in my post,

quote:
Sez b50m:
You have used the term 36 times.

http://forums.timesdaily.com/e...Type=1&search=Search



BUSTED!!!! (drum..........roll ) HERE'S YOUR SIGN. Big Grin
I see the forum schitzophrenic Cage/Jobe (Dr. Jeckle/Mr. Hyde of the TD forum) has returned. How did I get busted on using TEABAGGER?Where did I deny ever using the term TEABAGGER? Your fellow right wing radical, b50m displayed her cyber stalking techniques and stated I had posted TEABAGGER 36 times, this makes about 42 total I think, but ask b50m. She's keeping count. Roll Eyes
Last edited by rocky
quote:
Originally posted by rocky:
quote:
Perhaps it is Palin that is emulating Miller by quitting the two elected offices she was elected to serve. There has to be a logical correlation

An enigma wrapped in a riddle. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? In Palin's case I hope it wasn't a turkey, remember her interview at Thanksgiving with the turkeys being beheaded in the background??? She is absolutely HATED in Alaska, but thanks to Fox and friends she is the darling of the lower 48 who are republicans and especially the repubteacons (that is a nicer phrase Juan than the one I generally use for those who associate themselves with the tea party movement that have been shown on video with hats that had dangling tea bags) Wink


Oh, I forgot about your trained Fox technique of not including what was actually written. THIS is the qoute I was referring to when I said I didn't use the term:TEABAGGER
Why are you TEABAGGERS so shook up about the catch phrase that YOU started to coin your movement?? Don't blame it on the liberals, to qoute Billy Joel in paraphrase: We didn't start the TEABAGGERS! Big Grin I hope b50m is keeping up with the count.
quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
Joe Miller filed a lawsuit seeking to disenfranchise write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski’s voters who misspelled Murkowski’s name. In an amusing twist, Miller’s lawsuit was originally assigned to one of his former supervisors, a federal judge with a pretty low opinion of Joe Miller:

The federal judge originally assigned to hear Joe Miller’s lawsuit to challenge how write-in ballots are counted took himself off the case Wednesday because of the “negative opinion” he held of Miller. . . .
quote:

“The process for filling a part-time magistrate judge position is lengthy, a fact well known to Mr. Miller because he had gone through that process,” [Judge John] Sedwick wrote in an order from his chambers. “Mr. Miller’s failure to give reasonable notice of his resignation left the court with no judicial officer resident in Fairbanks, and no ability to fill the vacancy for many months. This incident caused me to form a negative opinion of Mr. Miller.”


At the time, Sedwick was the chief federal judge in Alaska and Miller’s supervisor.


Perhaps it is Palin that is emulating Miller by quitting the two elected offices she was elected to serve. There has to be a logical correlation.


As you well know, Governor Palin left office because about 25 accusations, proven false, tied up the state government and cost her family hundreds of thousands of dollars. The left made the accusations, proving once again, they will go to any means to destroy those they hate.
quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
It was a sexual term before it was a political term. The teabaggers just were not aware of it, which is kind of sad really.


As the term is used by gays, who make up about 3.5 percent of the population, and those suffering from impotence, why would most persons be aware of the sexual meaning, without researching it!
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
Joe Miller filed a lawsuit seeking to disenfranchise write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski’s voters who misspelled Murkowski’s name. In an amusing twist, Miller’s lawsuit was originally assigned to one of his former supervisors, a federal judge with a pretty low opinion of Joe Miller:

The federal judge originally assigned to hear Joe Miller’s lawsuit to challenge how write-in ballots are counted took himself off the case Wednesday because of the “negative opinion” he held of Miller. . . .
quote:

“The process for filling a part-time magistrate judge position is lengthy, a fact well known to Mr. Miller because he had gone through that process,” [Judge John] Sedwick wrote in an order from his chambers. “Mr. Miller’s failure to give reasonable notice of his resignation left the court with no judicial officer resident in Fairbanks, and no ability to fill the vacancy for many months. This incident caused me to form a negative opinion of Mr. Miller.”


At the time, Sedwick was the chief federal judge in Alaska and Miller’s supervisor.


Perhaps it is Palin that is emulating Miller by quitting the two elected offices she was elected to serve. There has to be a logical correlation.


As you well know, Governor Palin left office because about 25 accusations, proven false, tied up the state government and cost her family hundreds of thousands of dollars. The left made the accusations, proving once again, they will go to any means to destroy those they hate.


Sarah Palin resigned July 3, 2009 supposedly for her family and due to investigations. Elintoventor's right wing line about the left made up accusations is not true but the really telling part comes in the dismissal of the cases brought against Ms. Palin. Note the dates of dismissal from the Anchorage Daily News.

Ethics complaints filed against Palin

By The Associated Press

Published: June 21st, 2009 11:44 PM
Last Modified: June 22nd, 2009 07:35 AM

A listing of known ethics complaints filed against Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin:



1. July 28, 2008: Alaska lawmakers launched an investigation into whether Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power when she fired Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan over his refusal to let go a state trooper involved in a contentious divorce with Palin's sister. Stephen Branchflower, a special counsel leading the investigation, concluded Oct. 10 that Palin violated a state ethics law that prohibits public officials from using their office for personal gain. The firing itself was deemed lawful since Monegan was an at-will employee.

2. Aug. 6, 2008: Complaint filed by outspoken Palin critic Andree McLeod of Anchorage contended Palin and some staff members used their influence to get a Palin supporter a job in state government. Complaint alleged Palin staffers helped Tom Lamal, who once co-hosted a Palin fundraiser, to get a job as a surveyor. Dismissed by state personnel board, although the board's investigator recommended ethics training for one staffer who made questionable comments in e-mails.

3. Aug. 20, 2008: Complaint accused Palin of breaking election law by taking a public position on a mining ballot initiative days before the vote. Filed by Brian Kraft, founder of the Bristol Bay Alliance, a group that opposed the Pebble Mine prospect. Rejected May 8 by the Alaska Public Offices Commissioner

Aug. 29, 2008: Palin named as John McCain's running mate. 4. Sept. 2, 2008: Palin filed a "self disclosure" with the state personnel board over the Troopergate affair, saying a state legislative probe had become too political. On Nov. 3 -- the day before the election -- Timothy Petumenos, a lawyer hired by the board, said that Palin violated no ethics laws when she fired Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan.

5. Sept. 3, 2008: Complaint by the Public Safety Employees Association alleged Palin or her staff had unauthorized access to and improperly disclosed information from personnel records of Trooper Mike Wooten, Palin's ex-brother-in-law. Complaint was later amended to include an allegation of harassment. The PSEA's allegations were investigated alongside Palin's filing and also dismissed.

6. Oct. 13, 2008: Monegan asked the board for a hearing to clear his name. Petumenos, in his Nov. 3 Troopergate report to the panel, said there was no legal basis or jurisdiction for such a hearing.

7. Oct. 23, 2008: Complaint with the Federal Election Commission by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics alleged the $150,000-plus designer wardrobe the Republican Party bought to outfit Palin in her vice presidential quest violated Federal Election Campaign Act. The Washington watchdog group argued that candidates aren't supposed to use donor money for personal expenses. The FEC ruled May 19 that party money is not covered by the ban.

8. Oct. 24, 2008: Complaint contended Palin abused her power by charging the state when her children traveled with her. The personnel board found no wrongdoing, but in a Feb. 23 settlement Palin agreed to reimburse the state about $10,000 for costs associated with 10 trips found to be of questionable state interest among 72 travel authorizations studied. The money is due to the state on Tuesday.

9. Nov. 14, 2008: Accused Palin of partisan "post-election damage control" for talking to reporters about the campaign in her state office. Filed by Zane Henning, a North Slope worker from Wasilla, Palin's hometown. Dismissed by state personnel board March 23.

10. Dec. 2, 2008: Alleged Palin violated ethics law by campaigning for Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia. Filed by Anthony Martin of Talkeetna. Dismissed by state personnel board March 23.

11. Dec. 18, 2008: Complaint contended Palin misused funds of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, a quasi-government entity, to promote her political ambitions with advertisements featuring her, violating ethics law. The ads promoting Alaska seafood ran in the National Fisherman last year through November. Dismissed Jan. 12 after a personnel board investigation determined Palin's only involvement was to give permission to use her image long before she was named McCain's running mate.

12. Jan. 12: Complaint alleging interference in a job hiring was filed under the name of Edna Birch, a busybody character on the British soap opera Emmerdale. Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said no one by that name could be found living in Alaska and the filer refused to use a real name, so the complaint was dismissed Feb. 20.

13. and 14. Jan. 26: Two complaints filed by McLeod alleged two of Palin's top aides misused their official positions for Palin's personal and political gain. The complaints said then-press secretary Bill McAllister and Kris Perry -- director of the governor's Anchorage office -- worked on state time to benefit Palin's interests during and after her vice presidential quest. Pending.

15. March 18: Contended Palin improperly used state staff, property, time and equipment for partisan political purposes. One of the grievances cited was Palin's posting of her veep candidacy on the official state governor's Web site -- http://gov.state.ak.us/archive.php?id=1439&type=1 Complaint filed by McLeod. Dismissed May 27 as lacking merit by personnel board May 27.

16. March 24: Contended conflict of interest by Palin because she wore Arctic Cat logo gear during the Tesoro Iron Dog snowmobile race. Palin's husband, Todd, is sponsored by Arctic Cat in the race. Filed by Linda Kellen Biegel, a Democratic blogger. Dismissed June 2.

17. April 22: Alleged that work with Palin's political action committee violated two provisions of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act by misusing her official position and accepting outside employment. Filed by Anchorage resident Sondra Tompkins. Dismissed as lacking merit by state personnel board May 8.

18. April 27: Contends Palin is misusing the governor's office for personal gain by securing unwarranted benefits and receiving improper gifts through the Alaska Fund Trust. The fund was recently established by supporters to help Palin pay off more than $500,000 in legal debts stemming from other ethics complaints, including troopergate. Complaint filed by Eagle River resident, Kim Chatman. Pending

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×