Skip to main content

Arbitration is a corporate scam.

Companies strong-arm consumers into rigged dispute resolution, expose reveals.


Does your credit card or bank loan agreement have an "arbitration clause?" More and more consumer-oriented contracts and "agreements" have clauses specifying that disputes must go to arbitration rather than our civil justice system. The justification for this is that arbitration saves the time and expense of working within our legal system. But here's the thing: the corporations choose the arbitrators and every arbitrator knows they will never, ever, ever, ever (ever) get another job if they rule against the corporations. Never.
And guess what: 98.8% of arbitrations end up in favor of the corporations. This is not a surprise.
The Progressive States Network's newsletter has a story about this today, Arbitration:"Set up to squeeze small sums of money out of desperately poor people", http://www.progressivestates.org/content/850/arbitratio...rately-poor-people#1
The headline above is a quote from former West Virginia Supreme Court Justice Richard Neely, describing what his role was as an arbitrator at the National Arbitration Forum (NAF), a for-profit company hired to enforce mandatory arbitration clauses for credit card consumer loans. "NAF is nothing more than an arm of the collection industry hiding behind a veneer of impartiality," says Richard Neely.
In a devastating expose by BusinessWeek, http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/08_24/b4088072611398.htm Neely and other former arbitrators describe an arbitration system stacked completely against consumers -- a system where creditors win 99.8% of all disputes involving companies ranging from Bank of America to Sears to Citgroup. Arbitration clauses buried in the fine print of credit card offers means consumers lose the right to have disputes decided in an independent court and instead are forced into corporation-selected arbitration firms.
The BusinessWeek story mentioned in the Progressive States Network story is titled, Banks vs. Consumers (Guess Who Wins). http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/08_24/b4088072611398.htm
This story about credit card companies taking unfair advantage of consumers is one more attack on citizen rights to access our own legal system (one more of so many attacks). Think about what is happening here. First the big corporations fought against "regulations" which are the rules that We, the People set up requiring safe workplaces or environmental standards, or products that do not injure people, etc. Then when fewer regulations of course resulted in worker or consumer injuries or toxic spills or other harms the inured parties filed more lawsuits asking the companies to make good. So in response to these lawsuits the corporate-financed "tort reform" movement came along, working to limit the ability of citizens to be compensated for the results of corporate bad behavior. The result has been fewer regulations preventing harms and more restrictions on citizen access to courts where we can seek damages after we are harmed.


I didn't even bring up the corporate-conservative movement efforts to install their own business-friendly judges in the courts.
But even those erosions of our access to justice has not been enough for the greedy corporations. Now there is arbitration: clauses that show up in contracts and agreements that remove your ability to take a dispute to the courts at all! And the judges in these courts are dependent on the corporations for their livelihood!
Deregulation, tort reform and now arbitration that is rigged against the consumer. Drip, drip, drip. One after another the big corporations are eroding the rights of citizens.
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/88407/
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

As a registered principal in the securities industry, I can tell you arbitration in our business is just the opposite. Someone brings a complaint against you, you are automatically assumed to be in the wrong.

And there are some bad guys in our business, however have you noticed(well maybe not in the Shoals) all of the legal advertisements for securities fraud?

The documentation we go through now is ridiculous.

We will be video taping the transactions very soon with portable technology.
So, the great corporate father deploys masses of arbiters to squeeze pennies from the pockets of impoverish peasants! Does that sum up your statement? Corporations usually perform cost effective operations. Spending tens of thousands of dollars to recoup pennies doesn't meet those specifications.

And, the court system is corrupt beyond redemption? What is a man to do? Why call on the great Left Wing Avenger! Sorry, but the Green Arrow is a fictional character.
Last edited by Howard Roark
Arbitration agreements do, in fact, favor the party with the deep pockets. Not necessarily in that the arbitrators rule that way, but more so in the cost of the process. That's a general statement of course. Any time someone presents me with a contract that has an arbitration clause, I scratch through it. I'm rarely the party with the deep pockets.

Any time I get a contract that doesn't have an arbitration agreement, I thank the other party for not putting it in.

I can certainly understand anyone dealing with securities wanting such a clause. I invest in "high relative strength" stocks, and often they turn into high underperformers. I've noticed that any company that has a stock that has had a good run, then goes south - which is just about every stock sooner or later - ends up with a class action lawsuit. I imagine the brokers have to deal with the fallout also.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×