Skip to main content

With Texas A&M coming to the SEC, assuming it resolves its legal issues with the Big XII, it seems logical that the SEC will seriously look for a 14th team rather than leave the West and East divisions unbalanced.  It also seems logical that that 14th team will be from the dysfunctional and probably collapsing Big XII rather than an ACC school like FSU, Clemson, or VaTech, who haven't expressed any interest so far.  If that happens and the SEC gets a school like Missouri, it only makes sense geographically that Auburn should move to the SEC East to balance the divisions.  As an Auburn fan, I guess I could live with this, though I would definitely miss the annual Auburn-LSU game.  Alabama fans would probably be more upset, because it would probably mean having to give up playing Tennessee every year in order to keep the Iron Bowl.  By the way, if this happens I think the SEC should follow the Pac-12 and go to nine conference games so each team can still play three teams from the other division every year.

 

The other scenario I've heard talked about is both the SEC and the Pac-12 absorbing the remnants of a collapsed Big XII and becoming 16-team mega-conferences, possibly setting off further maneuvering among the Big 10, Big East, and ACC to try to do something similar.  While a lot of talk in the media has been about potential tv deals and such, I'm much more concerned with what a 16-team league would make the conference schedule look like.  If the SEC kept the East and West divisions, then probably both Auburn and Alabama would go to the East, but in my opinion that would make the divisions massively unbalanced (with respect to the other SEC West members and hypothetical Big XII additions), and that's not the only problem.  Even with nine conference games, each team would only have two games against teams from the other division each year, meaning at best you would play a team from the other division only once every four years (less if you want any permanent cross-division match-ups).  To me, that almost starts to feel like two separate conferences.

 

Here's my solution: Four 4-team mini-divisions, that might look something like this:

 

SEC East: Georgia, Florida, Vanderbilt, South Carolina

SEC North: Tennessee, Kentucky, two Big XII teams like Missouri and Oklahoma (or OSU)

SEC West: Arkansas, LSU, Texas A&M, another Big XII team like Texas Tech or maybe even Baylor

SEC South: Alabama, Auburn, Ole Miss, Mississippi State

 

I've seen something similar to this suggested before, but that person suggested a conference semi-final before the championship game.  Rather than mess with the postseason like that, I propose something more interesting.  The divisions would pair off each year to compete for the trip to Atlanta, and each year the pairs would rotate.  So the first year, the winner of the East-North would play the winner of the West-South in the championship, followed by East-South vs. West-North the next year, then East-West vs. North-South, and back to the beginning again.  Every team would play the three teams from their division plus the four teams from the division they're paired with, with two free conference games (the conference schedule would go to nine games), so cross-division rivalry games like Alabama-Tennessee and Auburn-Georgia wouldn't be threatened. To me, this seems like the best way that a 16-team SEC could preserve its big rivalries as well as regional rivalries, not mess with the postseason, and still allow all teams to play each other fairly regularly.  As a bonus, having four rotating divisions means you would never have a situation like the Big XII had where one side grows much stronger than the other.

 

Just my thoughts.  Its clear that change is coming to the SEC, and I just hope Mike Slive and the other people in charge don't screw things up and ruin something that has been working perfectly well.  The best outcome I can see out of the ones that seem possible right now would be for the SEC to grab West Virginia from the Big East and then everything continues on as basically normal just with one more conference game on the schedule.

Last edited by TheMeInTeam
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think the SEC will do all it can to balance things out. I believe Texas A&M and Mizzou will eventually be members of the west. West Virginia will be added to the east with a team to be named later. The SEC would love to add either VT or UNC, but it appears they will remain in the ACC. I believe the SEC's best option is to broker a deal with Florida to allow Florida St. to become members. I here there is not as much resistence to block FSU at Florida as it was twenty years ago. Besides if the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee can field two SEC programs, surely a state as large as Florida can. The rumor is that the TV networks want the SEC to expand to states were their are currently no SEC members, but I think the SEC has the pull to bring in FSU.

I understand why Florida and other established SEC powers might not want to add a traditional powerhouse like FSU to the conference (they've been down in recent years, but they'll be back, maybe as early as this season).  Finebaum for example has said that A&M is bad for the SEC and they should go after Texas and Oklahoma instead, but I think that's nuts.  Why would any current SEC school want more elite programs to compete with in the conference?  We don't need them.

 

I think Texas A&M is a great fit, though.  Historically, I'd place them right in the middle of the SEC West, behind Alabama, LSU, and Auburn, and ahead of Arkansas, Ole Miss, and MSU.  They're good enough and with a strong enough tradition that they'll make the conference more interesting, and some years they'll probably make a run, but they're not a serious threat to the established conference elite.  West Virginia would fit in similarly in the East, I think, and the rumors right now make them or Missouri seem to be the most likely possibility for a 14th team.

Finebaum is nuts.  Texas and Oklahoma do not want any part of the SEC.  The schedule is grueling and it is much easier for them to be big players in that playground than to join the SEC and face the likes of LSU, AL, Auburn, and Florida week after week.  I think we will see A&M and my guess is Missouri.  i doubt you will see any of the east coast schools opting to join us, and I do not really ant Virginia, having lived in that region for a while, I don't think they are good fit, VaTech would be much better, but again I think they like the ACC and would not leave it.

If Aubrun was moved to the East, I think in the long run it would probably be better since things have gotten so out of hand with the rivalry, but you could always opt for playing them each year, much like Auburn and Georgia do now.

I'm sure that neither Alabama nor Auburn would want to discontinue the Iron Bowl every year, though like I said, Alabama-Tennessee as an annual event would probably have to be sacrificed in that scenario.

 

In directly related news today, Auburn's president said he wouldn't object to Auburn moving to the SEC East if that was needed to keep the divisions balanced.  I'd still prefer to grab West Virginia instead and keep everything else the same.

IF such a move happened, which I doubt it would, the Iron Bowl doesn't necessarily have to be effected however it would set up a very real possibility, given the timing of the game's playing, where you could have the two immediately repeat the match two weeks or so later in Atlanta.  If Auburn did go to the East and Alabama stay in the West and both actually win their respective divisions than you would have the IRON Bowl immediately followed by the SEC Championship game which would then have the two immediately play again.  

 

I don't know how likely that scenario would be to play out if such a move happened but I seriously think that the SEC would reach out and add another EAST Team from the likes of Florida State, NC,  Maryland, or most likely West Virginia and balance things out.  Given, thought, that Florida and Florida State always play their last game against each other, if Florida State was added to balance Texas A&M that could set up a, equal to IRON Bowl, Rivalry game for the East too.  I could see the SEC giving Florida State a nod over West Virginia due to such an explosive decision which would really amp things up in Florida, and potentially in the East.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×