Is anyone surprised?
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
That was no Alien! That was James Carville!!
Hillary claims that she didn't have an intergalactic relationship with that being.
Yoko Ono without makeup and the wig.
Originally Posted by uandurine:
Hillary claims that she didn't have an intergalactic relationship with that being.
How did the space dust get on her pant suit?
Thought aliens had better taste.
Says bill was stunned because he thought she was gay, BUT, do we know if the alien was indeed male?
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Is anyone surprised?
__
Not at all surprised by your rank hypocrisy. After coming down on me for posting an article about cops groping and probing women at traffic stops, an article only a couple of years old, you now put up this ancient item from a laughably spurious source, which dates back to 2003!
A decline in mental faculties includes a decline in a sense of humor. Poor Condie, goes to the door and shouts down the hallway for the kids to get out of his non-existent lawn.
The comments on this post are like most news and political comments on this forum. Truth and facts don't come into play with right wingers.
Originally Posted by jtdavis:
The comments on this post are like most news and political comments on this forum. Truth and facts don't come into play with right wingers.
You may want to head on over to this thread
https://www.tnvalleytalks.com/t...er-in-anonymous-hack
to understand why you are reading these type posts. Understanding sarcasm is a trait liberals lack.
Originally Posted by jtdavis:
The comments on this post are like most news and political comments on this forum. Truth and facts don't come into play with right wingers.
______
jt, I know it is almost impossible to believe that a person as corrupt, dishonest and popular at the same time could actually exist but, Hillary is real and that's the truth and a fact.
Originally Posted by jtdavis:
The comments on this post are like most news and political comments on this forum. Truth and facts don't come into play with right wingers.
------------------------------
Oh brother! I really didn't think that even YOU would fall for this!!! Now I understand better what's wrong with you, seeing where you got your news!!
Originally Posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:
Originally Posted by jtdavis:
The comments on this post are like most news and political comments on this forum. Truth and facts don't come into play with right wingers.
You may want to head on over to this thread
https://www.tnvalleytalks.com/t...er-in-anonymous-hack
to understand why you are reading these type posts. Understanding sarcasm is a trait liberals lack.
------------------------------
Swoosh! Right over his and beternnun's pointed heads!! Hysterical!!
The Libs here...NEVER learn.
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Is anyone surprised?
__
Not at all surprised by your rank hypocrisy. After coming down on me for posting an article about cops groping and probing women at traffic stops, an article only a couple of years old, you now put up this ancient item from a laughably spurious source, which dates back to 2003!
=========================
You just can't stop lying. At least this time you didn't delete that thread before accusing me of something I didn't do, so I guess you learned something!! I came down on you for nothing of the sort! UGH!!! But now that YOU mention it, it does show one more aspect of the way you do things. Please show the one where I mentioned how old the article was. You can't, and again, you just LIE! I stand by both of my posts. I saw NO evidence of "probing or penetration". This thread was for fun, and again, if it's not as thrilling to you as a kid with two corn cobs, well, sorry.
=========================================================
1st post:
Must have had some inside out va-jay jays and hoo haws if they could have been PROBED with their pants on. Shows I have seen where they search they feel around on the outside of them, inside the undies, if they have them, and they get female officers to do that. UGH, talk about dealing with hazardous materials!! I hope they're paid enough.
Originally Posted by uandurine:
Originally Posted by jtdavis:
The comments on this post are like most news and political comments on this forum. Truth and facts don't come into play with right wingers.
______
jt, I know it is almost impossible to believe that a person as corrupt, dishonest and popular at the same time could actually exist but, Hillary is real and that's the truth and a fact.
==================
He knows that. The dirtier and more corrupt she and the leftie politicians are, the more the left loves them.
Swoosh! Right over his and beternnun's pointed heads!! Hysterical!!
----------------
I made one post on this story, so far you have made 8, Dire made 2, Hoob made 2, this is my second. Who is wiser?
Originally Posted by jtdavis:
Swoosh! Right over his and beternnun's pointed heads!! Hysterical!!
----------------
I made one post on this story, so far you have made 8, Dire made 2, Hoob made 2, this is my second. Who is wiser?
____________________________________________________
One must consider the totality of experience to make such a judgment. Hint, Athena isn't your patron goddess, nor is the owl your totem.
Who is wiser?
====================
Who is wiser? Anyone except you and any other demoslop. As to the posts, this IS my thread btw, I invite the posts, it's for fun, and to make fun of the lying demoslops trying to pass off bogus sites/articles as news. Your "one post" told the story of your cluelessness. Next question?
Here you go JT:
sar·casm
ˈsärˌkazəm/
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Is anyone surprised?
__
Not at all surprised by your rank hypocrisy. After coming down on me for posting an article about cops groping and probing women at traffic stops, an article only a couple of years old, you now put up this ancient item from a laughably spurious source, which dates back to 2003!
=========================
You just can't stop lying. At least this time you didn't delete that thread before accusing me of something I didn't do, so I guess you learned something!! I came down on you for nothing of the sort! UGH!!! But now that YOU mention it, it does show one more aspect of the way you do things. Please show the one where I mentioned how old the article was. You can't, and again, you just LIE! I stand by both of my posts. I saw NO evidence of "probing or penetration". This thread was for fun, and again, if it's not as thrilling to you as a kid with two corn cobs, well, sorry.
=========================================================
1st post:
Must have had some inside out va-jay jays and hoo haws if they could have been PROBED with their pants on. Shows I have seen where they search they feel around on the outside of them, inside the undies, if they have them, and they get female officers to do that. UGH, talk about dealing with hazardous materials!! I hope they're paid enough.
_____
You ridiculously say, "Please show the one where I mentioned how old the article was."
Well, hypocrite, the article I posted had a date shown, for those who cared enough to pay attention to that kind of thing. The article your posted on the space alien had no date showing.
Moreover, I nowhere alleged that you mentioned the age of the article, so your grief about that is nothing but a straw man. The fact remains that you faulted ME for posting an item a couple of years old--with a date showing-- but YOU posted one that was about a decade old--with no date showing or noted. I contend that the dates of both items are not all that relevant and that your complaint is a silly cavil driven by your childish obsession to claim a gotcha that is, in fact, no gotcha at all.
As to your question: "Where was the "probing and penetration" part?
Well, that information was right there in the item I posted, specifically: "
"What amazes me about this story, is not only is this an illegal, sexually-violating police search, but it happened on a public road, for anyone driving by to see. These two women were pulled over, for allegedly throwing a cigarette out of the car window. They were given full bodyinternal searches.
Gloves were not changed between anal and ******l probes, nor were they changed between women."
Follow-up articles report that these pervert cops were fired for the probing and penetration activity that they unlawfully perpetrated.
Had enough?
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Is anyone surprised?
__
Not at all surprised by your rank hypocrisy. After coming down on me for posting an article about cops groping and probing women at traffic stops, an article only a couple of years old, you now put up this ancient item from a laughably spurious source, which dates back to 2003!
=========================
You just can't stop lying. At least this time you didn't delete that thread before accusing me of something I didn't do, so I guess you learned something!! I came down on you for nothing of the sort! UGH!!! But now that YOU mention it, it does show one more aspect of the way you do things. Please show the one where I mentioned how old the article was. You can't, and again, you just LIE! I stand by both of my posts. I saw NO evidence of "probing or penetration". This thread was for fun, and again, if it's not as thrilling to you as a kid with two corn cobs, well, sorry.
=========================================================
1st post:
Must have had some inside out va-jay jays and hoo haws if they could have been PROBED with their pants on. Shows I have seen where they search they feel around on the outside of them, inside the undies, if they have them, and they get female officers to do that. UGH, talk about dealing with hazardous materials!! I hope they're paid enough.
_____
You ridiculously say, "Please show the one where I mentioned how old the article was."
And you, the lying hypocrite, couldn't show me because you lied about what I posted.
Well, hypocrite, the article I posted had a date shown, for those who cared enough to pay attention to that kind of thing. The article your posted on the space alien had no date showing.
So what? It is an all in fun article and I will post more. Why did you need a date? Were you thinking, if you can call what you do thinking, that it was recent?
Moreover, I nowhere alleged that you mentioned the age of the article, so your grief about that is nothing but a straw man.
The fact remains that you faulted ME for posting an item a couple of years old--with a date showing-- but YOU posted one that was about a decade old--with no date showing or noted. I contend that the dates of both items are not all that relevant and that your complaint is a silly cavil driven by your childish obsession to claim a gotcha that is, in fact, no gotcha at all.
Have you gone completely insane? First you claim that you didn't "allege" that I mentioned the age of the article when you most certainly did allege that very thing, AND you do it again in the "next breath" so to speak.
As to your question: "Where was the "probing and penetration" part?
Well, that information was right there in the item I posted, specifically: "
There was NO information and no proof of probing or penetration.
"What amazes me about this story, is not only is this an illegal, sexually-violating police search, but it happened on a public road, for anyone driving by to see. These two women were pulled over, for allegedly throwing a cigarette out of the car window. They were given full bodyinternal searches.
Gloves were not changed between anal and ******l probes, nor were they changed between women."
There were no INTERNAL probes. What did people "see"? Nothing. There was no exposure of any body part of the two women.
Follow-up articles report that these pervert cops were fired for the probing and penetration activity that they unlawfully perpetrated.
Perverted for doing her job? Surely you don't think they get a thrill out of putting their hands inside the pants of strange women? Especially skanking looking ones like these two! BTW, just how many are you claiming searched the women?
Had enough?
You sure have had enough. You've gone completely off the rails. At least you didn't delete the thread before you lied about what I had posted like you did the other one, but you are still claiming I posted things I didn't. But you don't think you should be labeled a liar. Amazing!
Proof that they were fired?
