Skip to main content

''White House Asked Bill Clinton to Urge Sestak to Drop Out of Senate Race

Published May 28, 2010

| FOXNews.com

The White House asked former President Bill Clinton to talk to Rep. Joe Sestak about the possibility of obtaining a senior position in the Obama administration if he would drop out of the Democratic primary race against establishment-backed Sen. Arlen Specter, the Obama administration will say in a report to be released Friday morning, Fox News has confirmed.''


Yeah, I'm sure Slick Willy was really concerned for Specter. Scape goat, and one that can't be prosecuted. How convenient.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm curious just how many (Democrats) will believe this?

What do we know?

An offer was made to Sestak in private.

Sestak accidentally mentioned it and it was then in the open.

Sestak was extremely quiet and silent about who made the offer and what it was.

White house was silent and quite as well as everyone else in the administration.

White house finally along with mainstream media began downplaying it saying everyone does it and that what was done was not illegal or problematic.

Talk was that what was done was most likely a felony and either someone in the Administration was guilty or if it was a position that the President would have known about would have been an impeachable offense.

Even powerful Democrats, in Congress expressed interest in the matter and finding out who did what and said what.

White House (Attorneys) lawyers were hard at work talking this over in the last few day.

Clinton was summoned to the White House to discuss the matter

Today word is that Clinton made the offer on behest of the Chief of Staff and that it was an appointed (NON PAID) position.

Who, in moderate intelligence, would believe a candidate leading in the polls, expected to win the Senate primary would withdraw from the race when offered a NON-PAID secondary position? Next who with reasonable intelligence believes what was said after all these days with lawyers looking it over and Clinton brought in think that this is exactly what it was and what happened.

Face it folks, you Democrats, you have elected a true Chicago style thug for a President and he cares very little about the law or about the Constitution but rather his laws are what they decide to do is right. They are the ones that knows what's right for us therefore they will force the Healthcare bill down our throats.

Does paying for forced healthcare or face a fine or punishment sound like anything to do with the definition of "freedom" or being free?


What this also shows is also evident. Just ask yourself what would have been the media's response had this been President Bush?
quote:
Originally posted by TAXEDENOUGH:
Put the liars under oath and see if they will tell the same story. By the way were are all of these Bush lied people. The entire bunch in the Obama clan are hard to believe. I guess they misspoke again, they Bush instead of Klinton


Oh that wouldn't be a problem to them. Remember Clinton? He lied under oath so being under oath isn't really any obstacle to them. They get through it by just redefining what the specific words in the questions mean.
About the only thing that EVERYONE (well maybe 99.8%) of the people on here, Democrat, Republican, and Independent should know or agree on is that IF this was a Republican Administration (George Bush or John McCain) you can bet your last dollar at 100 to 1 odds and become rich that the Media outlets (CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC) and many newspapers would be PAGE ONE with this story and would have double digit number of reporters running down leads and researching things.

Given that it's a liberal administration and someone they like then most are behaving like it was Kennedy back in office and girls slipping out the back of the White House. They turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to it hoping it will die.

If a Republican they would be the very ones calling for impeachment before any facts or information was put out there. They would be salivating over the time it took for the White House to respond but instead they are just as quick to try and give the doubt to what so evidently is a lie. Can anyone else remember the gleeful look in the eye of CBS's anchor while breaking the story about George Bush's National Guard Story. Ooops that one was false though but they still ran with it. Here they drop legitimate stories.

And they wonder why FOX news is running away in the ratings and the mainstream news stations are choking off their audience with very low trust ratings.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×