Skip to main content

For those of you who think that Nanny Bloomberg and his Liberal group Everytown (aka MAIG - the group lying about there being one 'school shooting' a week since Newtown) are really out to reduce mass shootings and protect your kids - think again.  Like we have said all along - the proposals they put forth only make it harder for law abiding citizens to purchase guns.  Criminals, by definition, dont care about your laws.

 

Quotes from Mark Glaze, soon to be former Executive Director for Everytown (MAIG) reported on in the Wall Street Journal:

 

And Mr. Glaze said the movement hasn’t solved one of its signature problems: Many mass shootings wouldn’t have been stopped by tighter regulations proposed  by gun-control advocates......

 

......"Because people perceive a mismatch in the policy solutions that we have to offer and the way some of these mass shootings happened, you know, it is a messaging problem for us, I think. … Is it a messaging problem when a mass shooting happens and nothing that we have to offer would have stopped that mass shooting? Sure it’s a challenge in this issue.

 

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/...care-hurt-our-cause/

 

So, basically, they are out pushing this false number about there being 74 'school shootings' since Newtown, one a week, but then admit that nothing they have to offer would have stopped the mass shootings.  

 

People buy into their hype, hook - line - sinker, yet I'm the crazy gun nut.  

 

Ohh, and BTW, now its Obamas fault that gun control hasn't made any headway (according to Mr Glaze).  You just cant make this stuff up.......

Beam me up, Scotty, there's no intelligent life here......

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Am I to understand that all the gun controls in the world will not cause any less gun violence?

 

No, im sure it would reduce gun violence to some degree, but (according to Newtowns former Executive Director, it would not stop these mass shootings they are using to stoke the fire.)

 

But, to have any real affect on 'gun violence,' gun control would have to be as severe as that of Australia (which Obama has been talking up lately).  Mass buy backs and full bans on most guns.  Not gonna happen in America, you see, we have this thing called a second amendment.  Doesnt stop the Liberals from dreaming though.

 

So, as i've asked before, why arent they talking about ways to reduce violence in general - which would (in the end) reduce gun violence?

Originally Posted by Road Puppy:
Originally Posted by Capt James T:

So, was that supposed to insult gun owners or LEO's  

 

 

Neither. Just your weekly gun whine is getting as bad as Bill Gray's gay whine.

Seriously.

 

 

 

RP,

 

I'd hope that someday you would wake up to what is going on around you.  But i doubt it.  You see, gun rights are going the way of smokers rights.  If Liberals can raise a generation of children that are afraid of guns and don't understand/use them, then they feel at some point the tide will turn and they will have the support for a constitutional amendment to repeal/modify the 2nd, much like they have outlawed smoking almost everywhere now that smokers are in the minority.

 

You don't seem to like guns, so I'm sure you don't care - just like i don't like smoking (im allergic to it) and don't care of smokers are forced to smoke in a bubble.  Lucky for me, however, that my right to own guns is protected by the 2nd amendment (for now).  Imagine where smokers would be had smoking been a constitutionally protected right (fortunately for me it is not ).

 

So, yes, I'll keep reminding those who care about the importance of the 2nd and about those that oppose it.  And ignoring those that don't care.....

Even the gun control Liberal masterminds have realized that the fight will be long and drawn out.  They know it may take them 50+ years to realize their gun free Utopia .  From the article above:

 

After the post-Newtown urgency, the timeline for reform is now much longer. Mr. Glaze spoke in terms of multiple election cycles before it would be realistic to think Congress would act.

The federal picture will change when legislators come to understand that we are here to stay. … I think it will take an election cycle or two to understand that there are new players in town and they are free to do what they know in their hearts are the right thing and what 80 to 90% of their constituents want. You can’t defy political gravity forever.”

Am I to understand that all the gun controls in the world will not cause any less gun violence?

 

 

Gun violence, a little, violence by itself, no. If the goobermint were to commit itself to forced confiscation and placing severe sentences on firearm ownership, we would be as safe as any Mexican citizen. As to school violence, the crazies might be forced to experiment with mixtures of fuels and oxidizers found on the internet, or perhaps a few gallons of gasoline and a match.

jefeddia_zps10521b0b

 

_--_----------------------------

I'd hope that someday you would wake up to what is going on around you.  But i doubt it.  You see, gun rights are going the way of smokers rights.  If Liberals can raise a generation of children that are afraid of guns and don't understand/use them, then they feel at some point the tide will turn and they will have the support for a constitutional amendment to repeal/modify the 2nd, much like they have outlawed smoking almost everywhere now that smokers are in the minority.

----------------------------------

Aaaaannnnnnd where's the problem with that?

Less secondhand smoke and fewer nutbags with arsenals...hell....*everybody wins.*

 

'Murica

Attachments

Images (1)
  • jefeddia_zps10521b0b
Last edited by Road Puppy

Jt, what the heck? Sheesh. 

 

I'm talking about the man and woman that got thrown off Bundys farm and later killed two policemen in some kind of eating shop, then they went somewhere else, a man with a pistol was gonna stop them, they killed him and then committed suicide or got shot by other cops.  Anyway, if that guy didn't have his gun with him, he would have stayed out of the way and maybe still been alive.

I'm not wanting to sound corny, but life is a precious thing.

What would have been good, if, when they were too whacked out to stay with Bundy, put them in a crazy house.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Jt, what the heck? Sheesh. 

 

I'm talking about the man and woman that got thrown off Bundys farm and later killed two policemen in some kind of eating shop, then they went somewhere else, a man with a pistol was gonna stop them, they killed him and then committed suicide or got shot by other cops.  Anyway, if that guy didn't have his gun with him, he would have stayed out of the way and maybe still been alive.

I'm not wanting to sound corny, but life is a precious thing.

What would have been good, if, when they were too whacked out to stay with Bundy, put them in a crazy house.

====================

Because we all know criminals, especially the "whacked out" criminals, never kill, or attack unarmed people.

Really want to do something about violence? Ban drugs and alcohol,  If there are any things where harsher laws are needed it's in these areas. Stop whining about the death penalty and actually use it, and stop letting killers, repeat offenders and serious criminals out of jail after only a few years. If they get "life", that should mean they are in for life, and not let out after 10 or 15 years to do it again.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Jt, what the heck? Sheesh. 

 

I'm talking about the man and woman that got thrown off Bundys farm and later killed two policemen in some kind of eating shop, then they went somewhere else, a man with a pistol was gonna stop them, they killed him and then committed suicide or got shot by other cops.  Anyway, if that guy didn't have his gun with him, he would have stayed out of the way and maybe still been alive.

I'm not wanting to sound corny, but life is a precious thing.

What would have been good, if, when they were too whacked out to stay with Bundy, put them in a crazy house.

For every armed person killed attempting to defend themselves with a gun I'm sure there are 10 that, because they had their gun, they were able to stop or prevent any further violence against them.  Of course, the media seldom reports on 'good guys with guns' using their guns to defend themselves - it doesn't fit the narrative.  But you can see some here, there are almost 1200 stories of self defensive gun uses, sorted by state.....

 

http://gunssavelives.net/browse-by-state/

 

 

For every armed person killed attempting to defend themselves with a gun I'm sure there are 10 that, because they had their gun, they were able to stop or prevent any further violence against them.  Of course, the media seldom reports on 'good guys with guns' using their guns to defend themselves - it doesn't fit the narrative.  

 

There is a reason you don't hear too much about that.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

For every armed person killed attempting to defend themselves with a gun I'm sure there are 10 that, because they had their gun, they were able to stop or prevent any further violence against them.  Of course, the media seldom reports on 'good guys with guns' using their guns to defend themselves -it doesn't fit the narrative.  

 

There is a reason you don't hear too much about that.

yep....

For every armed person killed attempting to defend themselves with a gun I'm sure there are 10 that, because they had their gun, they were able to stop or prevent any further violence against them.  Of course, the media seldom reports on 'good guys with guns' using their guns to defend themselves -it doesn't fit the narrative.  

 

There is a reason you don't hear too much about that.

 

I wonder how many innocent "good people" are killed with a good guys gun and how many "bad guys" are killed with a good guys gun

Originally Posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:

Anyone readily willing to give up rights in the name of a false sense of security is a coward and deserves neither.

 

Funny to see a Joe Dirt look alike making fun of the word "Merica".

 

--------------------------------
Lulz.
Even funnier is the fact that you're obviously not smart enough to realize what I'm actually making fun of.
 
 

Of course, the media seldom reports on 'good guys with guns' using their guns to defend themselves - it doesn't fit the narrative.  

 

-------------------------

They're too busy calling them "trigger happy", or editing the tapes to make it look as if they set out to purposely kill someone, or reporting a crazy person's killing rampage as a "shooting spree", when as many that were shot and killed were stabbed to death, with a car also used in the assault. Then they step on the faces of the other victims' families to get to, and shove, a camera and microphone in a grieving father's face while he rants and raves about guns.

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by mad American:

R.P. are you opposed to law abiding citizens arming themselves because you want to be able to slap someone weaker than you around without fear?

------------------

No, mad... Of course not.  That's a coward's thinking.  If I could whip your ass before you bought the gun, I can still do it while you're carrying it.

Last edited by Road Puppy
Originally Posted by mad American:

R.P. your last post reminds me of a wanna be bad ass.  I don't care how bad you think you are, you can't whip a gun.  I don't carry, I don't have too.  Enough people do carry, that bullies keep their hands to them selves around me.  Unlike you I am not a bad ass, and I also don't want folks to think that I am one.

I have an uncle, he was a Marine back in the early 70's.  Like most other Marines, he was a bad ass.  He was in on leave and had a party at my grandparents house while they were out of town.  His ex girlfriend showed up with her new man, who thought he was going to show off to his new girl and talk crap to a Marine.  My uncle, the bad ass, and this punk got into a fight.  Instead of taking the beating he deserved for running his mouth, he pulled a pistol and shot my uncle in the face.  

 

There are lots of bad asses out there, but I can promise them this - they wont out bad ass a bullet.  No matter how big they talk.  

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×