Bye-bye, Bachmann, Huntsman, Perry

Huntsman didn't campaign there so there is no suprise there. Bachmann is road kill, she could'nt win her home state.  Gingrich has a chance if he will campaign like he did tonight. His concession speech was classic Newt, it he keeps that up he has a chance. The problem is his baggage.

 

  The real disappointment is Ron Paul, while I like his positions I just believe he is not articulate enough. This is the one primary he needed to win or finish close second to have any chance for momentum. It's over for him.

RINO in a landslide! Romney wins Iowa by 8 (eight!) votes and stomps off to New Hampshire, where he is a solid favorite. Thus, it appears that Romney will win the first two GOP primary states. South South Carolina is a different story. A state that would elect the dingbat Nikki Haley as its governor is not likely to have much use for a moderate Republican. RINOs not welcome in the Palmetto State! Haley, winger that she is, nevertheless is campaigning for Romney, but given her current unpopularity in South Carolina, that could be a kiss of death. Meanwhile, the evil-tempered, snarling, flabby-jowled ATTACK DAWG will be snarling and growling: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45866677#.TwQY8TU7Uuc

Licking his wounds: http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/04/...28RSS%3A+Politics%29

Romney will win because he, and his friends with benefits, have the most money.  

Nothing else matters.

Its good to be a 1%'er!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 Not so fast there my friend. I have to agree with the analysis that said that 75% of the GOP in Iowa did not want Romney. He should have won Iowa walking away with Paul finishing a distant second. The last minute surge of the Christian vote to Santorum is real trouble for Romney. It shows the Christian conservatives are not ready to accept a Mormon. I think South Carolina could be his Waterloo.

 

 I think the real losers last nite was Bachmann and Ron Paul. The late deciders went to Santorum, that shows as well that the Christian conservatives are not willing to vote for a Libertarian. This is death to the Paul campaign as he cannot win without some of this vote.

 South Carolina will indeed be the Waterloo for Paul. I'm sad to say.

Whoever survives the Republican horror show will meet his Waterloo in November.

I don't believe Obama has lost yet.

HOW funny!  NOT ONE OF THE RETHUGLITEACON CLOWNS HERE AT THE TD BIG TOP CIRCUS ARE WILLING TO EVEN ANSWER THIS!

What a bunch of cowards!

Just "thugs" being "thugs"!

I hope all the regular "normal" folks who are NOT rethugliteacons or Foxophiles, give them all HELL in November when President Obama is reelected!

I may drive by and  raise a little myself!!!!!!!!!!!

Such a child just being a child...

 

 

What a Deek. And to think people like you actually proliferate.

An amoeba could best you in intelligence.

 

 

You need to try and stay in focus.

I hope all the regular "normal" folks who are NOT rethugliteacons or Foxophiles, give them all HELL in November when President Obama is reelected!

I may drive by and  raise a little myself!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------------------------

"Regular normal" folks like you? Do you think you're normal? Does a "normal" person think they can "drive by" a newspaper forum? What are you going to be driving? Do you still have your trikey or did mommy and daddy buy you a big boy bicycle for christmas? 

 

 

  Rocky's Ride???

The November election will be a Waterloo. However, the Republicans and Independents will play the part of the Duke of Wellington, the Tea party the part of the Prussians and Obama the part of Nappie.  Although, I find the idea of the Democrats playing the part of the French Guard ironic.  Froggies fought well, back then. 

 

FYI, for the uninitiated, Waterloo was a really bad day for Nappie.

 

Perhaps, the next President could offer Obama use of an Air Force plane for a one way trip to where ever.  Elba is lovely in January. 

OBama has 255 electoral votes in the bag.  He only has to win 1 of the big swing states Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania and North Carolina to win in 2012.  Guess where he'll be spending his $billion dollars in campaign cash?  Media outlets in those states are drooling over the extra revenue.  AlOBama will not see any campaing ads after the primary. 

I'd say Waterloo was the worst day and Elba would fit just fine.

Obama will lose, and then Waterloo will hit him between the eyes.

The sad part is a year can be a long time.

Ditzy makes the mistake of counting his votes before they're done at the polls.  With 42 % of the nation identifying as conservatives, 21 percent identifying as liberal/progressives and the rest as independents, there are more states in play than he admits.

 

 

---

But, but, but you've already declared OBama the loser in the general, even before the nominee is selected.

 I'm just passing along the DNC strategery, which is available on Youtube in videos from national campaign strategery meetings.  It's interesting to see how the people that look at politics like a sport view the election cycle.  There are no mentions of policy or issues, just the allocation of monies, because afterall it is just a popularity contest.  . 

Seems to me the Republicans have no intention of even trying to win the election. They appear to realize all they say they would do would only make the bad situation we are facing today worse, so they have thrown a bunch of unelectable clowns into the race, so they won't be put into a situation where they would be responsible of the further collapse of the country.
Nobody that has the slightest bit of intelligence could vote for any of them.

Rush is saying that the Repubic leadership has decided that OBama cant be beat and that Romney is the candidate least likely to offend the moderates and therefore the vote down the ticket.  In other words, the Repubics want someone more liberal and more likeable than McCain. 

The RNC strategy is to run on Obama's record -- videos of promises vs results. Nothing like letting someone indict himself with his own words.

 

I've seen several of the ads  and they are effective. 

The ads are only effective to the point that ignorant Americans (I12, for example) believe them.

Conservatives, such as myself, deal in facts and figures more than theoretical methods developed in the late 19th and early 20th century.  Inconvenient thing for those of the regressive prog left -- facts.

Like I said, ignorant folks (I12) will believe anything.

 

 

Maybe you should turn us on to the philosophy of Pop-tart labels?

Pity poor Jimi, his care giver hasn't changed his Depends, yet! 

Always nice to hear from dumb and dumber.