All California needs to do in leading the nation in gun control is declare everyone in the state except, politicians, police, union members, movie makers, and illegals(who can not be dealt with) as mentally ill and incompetent. And they can say the people have voted for the same corrupt leaders for so long it is obvious that voters are not sane. Thus denying guns to anyone but the ruling class, as they wish to do, and do away with guns and avoiding the silly constitutional thing of allowing ownership. I bet any liberal will be for this if it does not apply to them.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Control guns like Alabama tried to do. Anyone can carry open anywhere in the state except in the building where these people meet to make these laws. I wonder why they didn't want guns where they would be at?
Control guns like Alabama tried to do. Anyone can carry open anywhere in the state except in the building where these people meet to make these laws. I wonder why they didn't want guns where they would be at?
___________________________________________________________
Of course, in reality, there are a number of restrictions including airports, police stations and courts. But, don't let reality interfere with a good liberal rant!
Control guns like Alabama tried to do. Anyone can carry open anywhere in the state except in the building where these people meet to make these laws. I wonder why they didn't want guns where they would be at?
===================
They do have guns "where they at". Deputies carry guns. You make posts like that and wonder why no one takes you seriously about things?
I very seldom agree with jt. about anything, but he has a point. Imagine if you will, an armed populace watching the house and senate voting to mess up healthcare like the dimocraps did in odumas first term.
During the founding of DC, it was common for a civil servant to take a fowling piece (shotgun) to work on the chance he might shoot supper on the way home -- rabbits, squirrels and game birds. Time to revive an old custom?