I was just watching the ABC (Anything But Credibility) news and they headlined with President Trump's visit to Pittsburg where the mass killing of Jewish worshipers occurred.  The number of protesters that were protesting his visit along with others openly shouting at him that his visit wasn't welcome.  If President Trump singlehandedly cured cancer there would be thousands that would be protesting and arguing that he caused job losses in the medical field.

Some people are so deranged and filled with hatred at Trump that they cannot feel anything but hatred and anger.  I'm wondering just what Donald Trump had to do to warrant this level of anger and hatred toward him?  Or is it just anger and hatred targeted toward any Conservative or Republican?  I don't know if the answer will ever be known but it's sad.

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )

Original Post

He beat Hillary.  Demmies were salivating at the prospect of continuing and cementing their hold over government and the people.  Demmies are power oriented.  They will do anything to keep their power and influence.  

Last time they rendered the nation asunder, causing the death of 675,00.  

The news is now an arm of the Democrat party -- their Ministry of Propaganda.  Its always been slanted towards the left.  However, I've never seen them so desperately vicious and vile.  Truly mad dogs. 

 

GOP Rep. Steve King (Iowa) on Saturday defended his association with a n@z!-linked group in Austria, telling The Washington Post that the group is “far right.”

“If they were in America pushing the platform that they push, they would be Republicans,” King, who is known for his inflammatory statements about immigration, told the Post.

https://thehill.com/homenews/h...ld-be-republicans-if

 

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Yeah.  Now do you have examples of domestic terrorism?

https://www.politico.com/story...-stivers-nrcc-949523

Steve Stivers had had enough.

In an extraordinary moment just a week before the critical midterm elections, the chairman of the House Republican campaign arm called out a sitting colleague, accusing him of being racist.

Stivers, who leads the National Republican Congressional Committee, had been briefed on racially charged comments made recently by Iowa Republican Steve King, an immigration hard-liner with a history of controversial and insensitive remarks. And so with not even a heads-up to GOP leaders, Stivers went on Twitter and blasted his colleague.

He “could not stay silent,” said one source familiar with his thinking.

“Congressman Steve King’s recent comments, actions, and retweets are completely inappropriate,” Stivers wrote on Tuesday afternoon. “We must stand up against white supremacy and hate in all forms, and I strongly condemn this behavior.”

King has a history of racially insensitive comments, but he’s recently sparked even more of a backlash over his decision to endorse Faith Goldy — a white nationalist running for mayor of Toronto — and his latest criticism of liberal donor George Soros. In an interview with members of a far-right Austrian political party with historical **** ties, he tied Soros to the “Great Replacement” — a far-right conspiracy theory describing a push to replace white Europeans with minorities.

Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Farrakhan controls a sizable voting and donor base. Duke controls buttkiss.  If you didn't know this you are ignorant.  If you did know this,  you are a demagogue. 

Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

What else did they hide? Well, the fact the Muslims financed Obama's college education for one thing.

===================================

 

Saturday 0n Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Havard law professor Alan Dershowitz reacted to a photograph of President Barack Obama posing with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

At the time, Obama was a state senator, and according to Dershowitz, had he known Obama had posed with Farrakhan, he wouldn’t have supported him in his initial 2008 bid for the White House.

“Louis Farrakhan is a virulent anti-Semite,” he said. “He’s called Judaism a ‘gutter religion.’ He’s anti-American.”

“He is a horrible, horrible human being,” he continued. “And if I had known that the president had posed, smilingly, with him when was a senator, I would not have campaigned for Barack Obama. It would have influenced my decision. Look, I threatened to leave the party if Keith Ellison were elected as chairman because of his association with Farrakhan. You don’t associate with a bigot. You don’t associate with an anti-Semite. There should be zero tolerance for that kind of bigotry — and if Barack Obama associated with him, if the Black Caucus invited him, I don’t blame them for trying to suppress the truth because that’s a really horrible truth.”

Related image

Related image

Naio posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Because Kavanaugh, an originalist as to the Constitution, replaced a progressive.

Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

Robert Byrd

Naio posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Yeah.  Now do you have examples of domestic terrorism?

Farrakhan plays it smart.  He caused blacks to distrust and hate Jews in their communities.  Jews, who were strong within the civil right movement.

Its called plausible deniability.  Farrakhan sold his poison, got rich and gained influence, which peddles amongst the Democrats.

Plausible deniability has an old history.  For example, the Holocaust.  The Holocaust happened, it was real, and 8 to 10 million died under horrible circumstances.  The victims included about 6 million Jews, plus gays, Roma (gypsies), and political prisoners.  But, who ordered?  Of course, we'd state Adolf Hitler and be correct. However, historians, to this day, can't find the order or even suggestion that he ordered the mass murders. 

As to the KKK, Of the 4,743 persons lynched by the KKK from 1882 to 1964, 1,297 were white Republicans. So, pardon me, if I have a strong distrust of them.

direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Farrakhan controls a sizable voting and donor base. Duke controls buttkiss.  If you didn't know this you are ignorant.  If you did know this,  you are a demagogue. 

Prove it. Source?

gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Yeah.  Now do you have examples of domestic terrorism?

Farrakhan plays it smart.  He caused blacks to distrust and hate Jews in their communities.  Jews, who were strong within the civil right movement.

Its called plausible deniability.  Farrakhan sold his poison, got rich and gained influence, which peddles amongst the Democrats.

Plausible deniability has an old history.  For example, the Holocaust.  The Holocaust happened, it was real, and 8 to 10 million died under horrible circumstances.  The victims included about 6 million Jews, plus gays, Roma (gypsies), and political prisoners.  But, who ordered?  Of course, we'd state Adolf Hitler and be correct. However, historians, to this day, can't find the order or even suggestion that he ordered the mass murders. 

As to the KKK, Of the 4,743 persons lynched by the KKK from 1882 to 1964, 1,297 were white Republicans. So, pardon me, if I have a strong distrust of them.

Farrakhan means more to some republicans than he does to black people.

 

All it takes is a wink and a nod, the next thing you know some wacko shoots up a synagogue.

 

Pardon me but nowadays, it seems like some republicans have strong feelings have hatred towards democrats.  That's why I don't trust republicans.

Once again:  https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

http://bittersoutherner.com/fr...y-keri-leigh-merritt

 

Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black (white) superiority over whites (blacks) and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI (kkk, neo-****s, far-right) a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

The ideology is the same, but somehow only one is considered "leftist."

Naio posted:
direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Farrakhan controls a sizable voting and donor base. Duke controls buttkiss.  If you didn't know this you are ignorant.  If you did know this,  you are a demagogue. 

Prove it. Source?

Prove what?  Be specific!

Naio posted:
gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

Yes, a few old line Democrats became Republicans.  They may now be found in cemeteries.   Perhaps, you might choose something more current.  Say from the last 25 years.

Naio posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black (white) superiority over whites (blacks) and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI (kkk, neo-****s, far-right) a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

The ideology is the same, but somehow only one is considered "leftist."

Exactly what are attempting to prove?  Other than the Democrats have allied themselves with Nation of Islam!  The leftwing desire to control government. Then, to control the populace is the same as ever.

direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black (white) superiority over whites (blacks) and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI (kkk, neo-****s, far-right) a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

The ideology is the same, but somehow only one is considered "leftist."

Exactly what are attempting to prove?  Other than the Democrats have allied themselves with Nation of Islam!  The leftwing desire to control government. Then, to control the populace is the same as ever.

Would you care to prove that the democrats as a whole have aligned themselves with the noi and farrakhan controls a sizable voting and donor base? 

The right wing pretends to want a smaller government.  Then they want want the government to control the lives of everyone else.  Abortion, lgbtq, etc...

direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

Yes, a few old line Democrats became Republicans.  They may now be found in cemeteries.   Perhaps, you might choose something more current.  Say from the last 25 years.

http://bittersoutherner.com/fr...y-keri-leigh-merritt

And we must take heed of the beliefs of men like Leonidas Spratt, who championed reopening the African slave trade in the 1850s, and also worked hard to keep poorer whites from casting a ballot. Spratt claimed that throughout history, the most successful societies depended on “the greatest political inequalities.” Today, Brian Kemp and many other Republicans across the South are carrying on the Confederacy’s legacies — birthed in oligarchy, and ultimately dedicated to preserving white supremacy at any cost.

Stolen elections included.

North Dakota Is Entering “No Longer a Democracy” Territory With Its Latest Efforts to Disenfranchise Native Americans

https://slate.com/news-and-pol...ns-votes-stolen.html

It is worth marveling at how far afield the North Dakota government has drifted from the original rationale behind its new law. When they introduced this legislation, Republicans claimed they were seeking to curb voter fraud. (There is no evidence that voter fraud is a problem in North Dakota, or anywhere else in the U.S.) Yet no one seriously claims that Native Americans are exploiting their lack of a residential address to cast illegal ballots. This legal battle has laid bare the law’s true intent—to disenfranchise minority voters who might give Heitkamp another term. Now Native Americans must plead with the courts to stop their state from voiding their vote. This is not what a democracy looks like


Brian Kemp’s Voter Suppression Tactics Take a Hit in Court

https://www.rollingstone.com/p...sion-georgia-751346/

direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black (white) superiority over whites (blacks) and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI (kkk, neo-****s, far-right) a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

The ideology is the same, but somehow only one is considered "leftist."

Exactly what are attempting to prove?  Other than the Democrats have allied themselves with Nation of Islam!  The leftwing desire to control government. Then, to control the populace is the same as ever.

Simple observation!  Bill Clinton and Obama associating with Farrakhan, a rabid anti-Semite.  Never saw Trump associating with David Duke, a Democrat scarecrow/strawman.  

Naio posted:
direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

Yes, a few old line Democrats became Republicans.  They may now be found in cemeteries.   Perhaps, you might choose something more current.  Say from the last 25 years.

http://bittersoutherner.com/fr...y-keri-leigh-merritt

And we must take heed of the beliefs of men like Leonidas Spratt, who championed reopening the African slave trade in the 1850s, and also worked hard to keep poorer whites from casting a ballot. Spratt claimed that throughout history, the most successful societies depended on “the greatest political inequalities.” Today, Brian Kemp and many other Republicans across the South are carrying on the Confederacy’s legacies — birthed in oligarchy, and ultimately dedicated to preserving white supremacy at any cost.

Stolen elections included.

The article cited used the 1850s as the actionable point.  Rather amusing, if ignorant.  The Voting Rights Act wasn't gutted by SCOTUS, the 9 states had their rights restored.  If, there is any actionable wrongs by the states, one may still appeal to DoJ as is done.

Meanwhile, the Democrats are practicing their old methods to keep control.  Just use a different venue and dusted off the old ways. 

California is the new Confederacy, or, at least South Carolina. Add, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii to complete the set.  New York state and the New England states are the new border states like Missouri, Kentucky and Maryland were.

The old confederacy possessed a small extremely wealthy class, a tiny middle class, slaves and large numbers of whites and free blacks in poverty.   The cotton plantation owners and factors such as Lehman Brothers, who traded in cotton, made up the wealthy class.  The small middle class included doctors, lawyers, larger shop owners and few others that catered to the wealthy.  Slave labor depressed the wages of most others. 

California’s wealthy class are mostly those in IT, show business and a few industries.  Lawyers and doctors, who cater to the aforementioned, form the upper middleclass.  The wealthy use imported labor to depress IT wages at one end and unskilled labor to keep their lawn, mansions and such, well manicured and spick and span – mimicking slavery of old.  Use of such depresses the wages of a dwindling middle class.  Add, rising taxes and either those in the middle class become poor or leave the state. California has 12 percent of the nation’s population.  But, one-third of the homeless and one-third of those on welfare. Again, a modern version of the old confederacy, complete with rebellious state governments. 

And, lickspittles who justify it. 

 

 

Jutu posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

What else did they hide? Well, the fact the Muslims financed Obama's college education for one thing.

===================================

 

Saturday 0n Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Havard law professor Alan Dershowitz reacted to a photograph of President Barack Obama posing with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

At the time, Obama was a state senator, and according to Dershowitz, had he known Obama had posed with Farrakhan, he wouldn’t have supported him in his initial 2008 bid for the White House.

“Louis Farrakhan is a virulent anti-Semite,” he said. “He’s called Judaism a ‘gutter religion.’ He’s anti-American.”

“He is a horrible, horrible human being,” he continued. “And if I had known that the president had posed, smilingly, with him when was a senator, I would not have campaigned for Barack Obama. It would have influenced my decision. Look, I threatened to leave the party if Keith Ellison were elected as chairman because of his association with Farrakhan. You don’t associate with a bigot. You don’t associate with an anti-Semite. There should be zero tolerance for that kind of bigotry — and if Barack Obama associated with him, if the Black Caucus invited him, I don’t blame them for trying to suppress the truth because that’s a really horrible truth.”

Related image

Related image

 

As both Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, have noted many times, they paid for their educations via scholarships and student loans, in the process (like many people) incurring debts which were not fully paid off until many years later. (In the Obamas’ case, it was largely the revenue derived from Barack’s pair of best-selling books that finally allowed them to retire their student loan debts.)

gbrk posted:

I was just watching the ABC (Anything But Credibility) news and they headlined with President Trump's visit to Pittsburg where the mass killing of Jewish worshipers occurred.  The number of protesters that were protesting his visit along with others openly shouting at him that his visit wasn't welcome.  If President Trump singlehandedly cured cancer there would be thousands that would be protesting and arguing that he caused job losses in the medical field.

Some people are so deranged and filled with hatred at Trump that they cannot feel anything but hatred and anger.  I'm wondering just what Donald Trump had to do to warrant this level of anger and hatred toward him?  Or is it just anger and hatred targeted toward any Conservative or Republican?  I don't know if the answer will ever be known but it's sad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD068xXkCZc

 

A "genius", LOL!!

direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

Yes, a few old line Democrats became Republicans.  They may now be found in cemeteries.   Perhaps, you might choose something more current.  Say from the last 25 years.

http://bittersoutherner.com/fr...y-keri-leigh-merritt

And we must take heed of the beliefs of men like Leonidas Spratt, who championed reopening the African slave trade in the 1850s, and also worked hard to keep poorer whites from casting a ballot. Spratt claimed that throughout history, the most successful societies depended on “the greatest political inequalities.” Today, Brian Kemp and many other Republicans across the South are carrying on the Confederacy’s legacies — birthed in oligarchy, and ultimately dedicated to preserving white supremacy at any cost.

Stolen elections included.

The article cited used the 1850s as the actionable point.  Rather amusing, if ignorant.  The Voting Rights Act wasn't gutted by SCOTUS, the 9 states had their rights restored.  If, there is any actionable wrongs by the states, one may still appeal to DoJ as is done.

Meanwhile, the Democrats are practicing their old methods to keep control.  Just use a different venue and dusted off the old ways. 

California is the new Confederacy, or, at least South Carolina. Add, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii to complete the set.  New York state and the New England states are the new border states like Missouri, Kentucky and Maryland were.

The old confederacy possessed a small extremely wealthy class, a tiny middle class, slaves and large numbers of whites and free blacks in poverty.   The cotton plantation owners and factors such as Lehman Brothers, who traded in cotton, made up the wealthy class.  The small middle class included doctors, lawyers, larger shop owners and few others that catered to the wealthy.  Slave labor depressed the wages of most others. 

California’s wealthy class are mostly those in IT, show business and a few industries.  Lawyers and doctors, who cater to the aforementioned, form the upper middleclass.  The wealthy use imported labor to depress IT wages at one end and unskilled labor to keep their lawn, mansions and such, well manicured and spick and span – mimicking slavery of old.  Use of such depresses the wages of a dwindling middle class.  Add, rising taxes and either those in the middle class become poor or leave the state. California has 12 percent of the nation’s population.  But, one-third of the homeless and one-third of those on welfare. Again, a modern version of the old confederacy, complete with rebellious state governments. 

And, lickspittles who justify it. 

 

 

Cool. Now do Georgia or North Dakota.

Florida is the biggest unknown and state in transition.  Texas is still mostly conservative but it appears that Florida may elect the mayor of Tallahassee, the very radical Democrat, who if is successful in transforming Florida will be just reward for those who have moved from states that were messed up by liberals only to continue to vote the same way putting in the same type people that ruined the states they left in the first place.  Florida has almost been taken over by those from Northern states moving to Florida to live.  California is another example of a State that was basically Conservative and changed to Liberal and now you have people leaving California in droves and lots of them are choosing to move to Texas (from what I have heard).  

What's crazy is how people that have the means to leave states that become inhabitable due to extremely high taxation and restrictions move to places that are much more desirable living areas only to attempt to enact changes that will ultimately end up turning their new location into their old one that they chose to flee from.  

Naio posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Surely you can't be that obtuse?

Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Naio posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Surely you can't be that obtuse?

Obtuse is her middle name

Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Naio posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Surely you can't be that obtuse?

Kick rocks if you can't back your claims up.  

Kraven posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:
Naio posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Surely you can't be that obtuse?

Obtuse is her middle name

This outta be good.  Who do you think I am?

gbrk posted:

Florida is the biggest unknown and state in transition.  Texas is still mostly conservative but it appears that Florida may elect the mayor of Tallahassee, the very radical Democrat, who if is successful in transforming Florida will be just reward for those who have moved from states that were messed up by liberals only to continue to vote the same way putting in the same type people that ruined the states they left in the first place.  Florida has almost been taken over by those from Northern states moving to Florida to live.  California is another example of a State that was basically Conservative and changed to Liberal and now you have people leaving California in droves and lots of them are choosing to move to Texas (from what I have heard).  

What's crazy is how people that have the means to leave states that become inhabitable due to extremely high taxation and restrictions move to places that are much more desirable living areas only to attempt to enact changes that will ultimately end up turning their new location into their old one that they chose to flee from.  

If, Gillum wins, I suggest they rename Florida -- Nueva Venezuela. 

direstraits posted:
gbrk posted:

Florida is the biggest unknown and state in transition.  Texas is still mostly conservative but it appears that Florida may elect the mayor of Tallahassee, the very radical Democrat, who if is successful in transforming Florida will be just reward for those who have moved from states that were messed up by liberals only to continue to vote the same way putting in the same type people that ruined the states they left in the first place.  Florida has almost been taken over by those from Northern states moving to Florida to live.  California is another example of a State that was basically Conservative and changed to Liberal and now you have people leaving California in droves and lots of them are choosing to move to Texas (from what I have heard).  

What's crazy is how people that have the means to leave states that become inhabitable due to extremely high taxation and restrictions move to places that are much more desirable living areas only to attempt to enact changes that will ultimately end up turning their new location into their old one that they chose to flee from.  

If, Gillum wins, I suggest they rename Florida -- Nueva Venezuela. 

DeSantis is predicted to win over Gillum ....thankfully folks in Florida made the right choice to preserve their progress.  Brian Kemp also soundly defeated Stacy Abrams so Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida have all voted in Republican Governors.  Looks though that the Democrats will have taken and controlled the House.  I believe that the Stock Market will show it's displeasure but who knows how that will go.  Looks like Republicans will gain some seats in the Senate making it easier to confirm judges and get other things done.

One thing about Democrats taking control of the House is that, from what I have heard, they won the House by taking moderate stands and not highly liberal ones so if they then turn and legislate from the highly liberal position then I believe they will lose in two years and other Democrats should realize that it took moving toward moderate positions to enable them to win.

Add Reply

Likes (1)
Jutu

×
×
×
×