Skip to main content

I was just watching the ABC (Anything But Credibility) news and they headlined with President Trump's visit to Pittsburg where the mass killing of Jewish worshipers occurred.  The number of protesters that were protesting his visit along with others openly shouting at him that his visit wasn't welcome.  If President Trump singlehandedly cured cancer there would be thousands that would be protesting and arguing that he caused job losses in the medical field.

Some people are so deranged and filled with hatred at Trump that they cannot feel anything but hatred and anger.  I'm wondering just what Donald Trump had to do to warrant this level of anger and hatred toward him?  Or is it just anger and hatred targeted toward any Conservative or Republican?  I don't know if the answer will ever be known but it's sad.

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

He beat Hillary.  Demmies were salivating at the prospect of continuing and cementing their hold over government and the people.  Demmies are power oriented.  They will do anything to keep their power and influence.  

Last time they rendered the nation asunder, causing the death of 675,00.  

The news is now an arm of the Democrat party -- their Ministry of Propaganda.  Its always been slanted towards the left.  However, I've never seen them so desperately vicious and vile.  Truly mad dogs. 

 

Last edited by direstraits

GOP Rep. Steve King (Iowa) on Saturday defended his association with a n@z!-linked group in Austria, telling The Washington Post that the group is “far right.”

“If they were in America pushing the platform that they push, they would be Republicans,” King, who is known for his inflammatory statements about immigration, told the Post.

https://thehill.com/homenews/h...ld-be-republicans-if

 

Last edited by Naio
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

Last edited by Naio

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Yeah.  Now do you have examples of domestic terrorism?

https://www.politico.com/story...-stivers-nrcc-949523

Steve Stivers had had enough.

In an extraordinary moment just a week before the critical midterm elections, the chairman of the House Republican campaign arm called out a sitting colleague, accusing him of being racist.

Stivers, who leads the National Republican Congressional Committee, had been briefed on racially charged comments made recently by Iowa Republican Steve King, an immigration hard-liner with a history of controversial and insensitive remarks. And so with not even a heads-up to GOP leaders, Stivers went on Twitter and blasted his colleague.

He “could not stay silent,” said one source familiar with his thinking.

“Congressman Steve King’s recent comments, actions, and retweets are completely inappropriate,” Stivers wrote on Tuesday afternoon. “We must stand up against white supremacy and hate in all forms, and I strongly condemn this behavior.”

King has a history of racially insensitive comments, but he’s recently sparked even more of a backlash over his decision to endorse Faith Goldy — a white nationalist running for mayor of Toronto — and his latest criticism of liberal donor George Soros. In an interview with members of a far-right Austrian political party with historical **** ties, he tied Soros to the “Great Replacement” — a far-right conspiracy theory describing a push to replace white Europeans with minorities.

Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Farrakhan controls a sizable voting and donor base. Duke controls buttkiss.  If you didn't know this you are ignorant.  If you did know this,  you are a demagogue. 

Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

What else did they hide? Well, the fact the Muslims financed Obama's college education for one thing.

===================================

 

Saturday 0n Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Havard law professor Alan Dershowitz reacted to a photograph of President Barack Obama posing with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

At the time, Obama was a state senator, and according to Dershowitz, had he known Obama had posed with Farrakhan, he wouldn’t have supported him in his initial 2008 bid for the White House.

“Louis Farrakhan is a virulent anti-Semite,” he said. “He’s called Judaism a ‘gutter religion.’ He’s anti-American.”

“He is a horrible, horrible human being,” he continued. “And if I had known that the president had posed, smilingly, with him when was a senator, I would not have campaigned for Barack Obama. It would have influenced my decision. Look, I threatened to leave the party if Keith Ellison were elected as chairman because of his association with Farrakhan. You don’t associate with a bigot. You don’t associate with an anti-Semite. There should be zero tolerance for that kind of bigotry — and if Barack Obama associated with him, if the Black Caucus invited him, I don’t blame them for trying to suppress the truth because that’s a really horrible truth.”

Related image

Related image

Last edited by Jutu
Naio posted:
Mr. Hooberbloob posted:

Meanwhile in actual America, the dims are best buddies with Louis Farrakhan and his anti Semitic merry band of racists.

It not just Trump, anyone who stands in the left's way of destroying America is in their cross hairs.   Just look to the supreme court confirmation for undeniable proof.

Really? All of the dems? Why was there such a difference between the gorsuch and kavanaugh confirmations?

Because Kavanaugh, an originalist as to the Constitution, replaced a progressive.

Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

Robert Byrd

Naio posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Yeah.  Now do you have examples of domestic terrorism?

Farrakhan plays it smart.  He caused blacks to distrust and hate Jews in their communities.  Jews, who were strong within the civil right movement.

Its called plausible deniability.  Farrakhan sold his poison, got rich and gained influence, which peddles amongst the Democrats.

Plausible deniability has an old history.  For example, the Holocaust.  The Holocaust happened, it was real, and 8 to 10 million died under horrible circumstances.  The victims included about 6 million Jews, plus gays, Roma (gypsies), and political prisoners.  But, who ordered?  Of course, we'd state Adolf Hitler and be correct. However, historians, to this day, can't find the order or even suggestion that he ordered the mass murders. 

As to the KKK, Of the 4,743 persons lynched by the KKK from 1882 to 1964, 1,297 were white Republicans. So, pardon me, if I have a strong distrust of them.

Last edited by direstraits
direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Farrakhan controls a sizable voting and donor base. Duke controls buttkiss.  If you didn't know this you are ignorant.  If you did know this,  you are a demagogue. 

Prove it. Source?

gbrk posted:
Naio posted:
Naio posted:
direstraits posted:

Democrats, including presidents Obama and Clinton, have openly met with ant-Semites and racists like Farrakhan and Linda Sarsour.  Never saw President Trump meeting or even agreeing with David Duke, who has almost no influence with anyone about anything. 

The same with Farrakhan. 

Furthermore, the kkk, as an organization, has a well documented history of domestic terrorism. The nation of islam doesn't.  Fact check me...


The thought of people even trying to deflect from the reality of what happened in Pittsburgh shows how lost the republican party is now.

I don't know that using the KKK (Ku Klux Klan) advances your point with respect to the Republican party because during the majority of the KKK's history, as an organization, they were mainly backed by, supportive of, and members of the Democratic party.  Up until the 1960's some of the Democratic parties leading politicians held positions within the KKK even.  Just like in the passing of Civil Rights legislation Lyndon Johnson would never have achieved that Civil Rights legislation without Republican support for it was the Democrats, mostly Southern Democrats, that opposed the legislation and tried to prohibit it from passing.  It only passed with Republican support.  Many want to ignore that fact but history is what it is.

https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

direstraits posted:
Naio posted:
Kraven posted:

Since its founding in 1930, the Nation of Islam (NOI) has grown into one of the wealthiest and best-known organizations in black America. Its theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBT rhetoric of its leaders have earned the NOI a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate.

 

Yeah.  Now do you have examples of domestic terrorism?

Farrakhan plays it smart.  He caused blacks to distrust and hate Jews in their communities.  Jews, who were strong within the civil right movement.

Its called plausible deniability.  Farrakhan sold his poison, got rich and gained influence, which peddles amongst the Democrats.

Plausible deniability has an old history.  For example, the Holocaust.  The Holocaust happened, it was real, and 8 to 10 million died under horrible circumstances.  The victims included about 6 million Jews, plus gays, Roma (gypsies), and political prisoners.  But, who ordered?  Of course, we'd state Adolf Hitler and be correct. However, historians, to this day, can't find the order or even suggestion that he ordered the mass murders. 

As to the KKK, Of the 4,743 persons lynched by the KKK from 1882 to 1964, 1,297 were white Republicans. So, pardon me, if I have a strong distrust of them.

Farrakhan means more to some republicans than he does to black people.

 

All it takes is a wink and a nod, the next thing you know some wacko shoots up a synagogue.

 

Pardon me but nowadays, it seems like some republicans have strong feelings have hatred towards democrats.  That's why I don't trust republicans.

Once again:  https://threadreaderapp.com/th...981446615322624.html

http://bittersoutherner.com/fr...y-keri-leigh-merritt

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×