Skip to main content

Clear Channel bows to pressure to air ads for former Tiller abortion facility

by Thaddeus Baklinski

 

WICHITA, Kansas, August 30, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Ads for an abortion facility will soon fill Kansas airwaves, after a Clear Channel radio station has changed its policy, according to a pro-life group.

 

"For several months Clear Channel radio refused paid ads from the new South Wind abortion clinic operating inside George Tiller's former abortion clinic in Wichita," said Kathy Ostrowski, the legislative director of Kansans for Life. “After news that South Wind was going to present them with a 68,000 signature petition, Clear Channel has caved, even though petition gatherers admitted that the 'vast majority' of signers are from outside Wichita.”

 

"In other words, East and West coast liberals insist Clear Channel help encourage Kansas women to get abortions!" Ostrowski said.

 

A call by LifeSiteNews to Clear Channel operations manager in Wichita, Tony Matteo, to request an explanation for the network's about-face regarding the abortion clinic ads resulted in a recorded message saying his office was closed. A voicemail message requesting comment was not returned by press time.

 

The South Wind Women's Center collected signatures from across the country in partnership with Women, Action & the Media, a pro-abortion group that advocates for gender equity in media, according to an AP report.

 

Jaclyn Friedman, the director of the gender equality group that helped South Wind in their national petition drive, "had the audacity to claim that they are ‘concerned about the precedent that could be set if it is allowed to stand — where a private company can decide whether or not local women get information about how to access health care,'" Ostrowski said.

 

Kansans for Life Executive Director Mary Kay Culp responded that Clear Channel does indeed have the right to determine what ads it will run.

 

"First, a private company certainly enjoys that right," Culp said.

 

"Second, I can safely say that Clear Channel did not originally object to the ads because they promoted 'health care,'” she added. “Abortion is not health care. Abortion is the killing of an unborn human child for money – South Wind 's specialty – again overseen by George Tiller's former employee who helped that clinic as it performed 3,000 late-term abortions here the first ten years of this century!"

 

Julie Burkhart, a former employee at the clinic, who also acted as head of George Tiller’s political action committee, ProKanDo, runs South Wind Women’s Center.

 

Her new organization, the Trust Women Foundation, purchased the site where Tiller's clinic operated with the intention of “keeping Dr. Tiller’s legacy alive.”

Kansans for Life has started its own petition to counter that presented to Clear Channel by the abortion clinic.

 

"If they want to play the national petition game, I dare say we could outnumber them 10 or a 100 to one – like we have every January in D.C. and all the state capitals for 40 years," stated Mary Kay Culp.

 

She asked pro-lifers from across the country to sign a new petition, to be delivered on November 1, All Souls Day.

 

She also asks people to contact Clear Channel Radio at 316-494-6600, and speak with operations manager, Tony Matteo.

 

“Please be courteous and polite,” Culp said. Then “express your disappointment that they have decided to run the abortion clinic advertisements, and ask him to reconsider that decision.

The petition asking Clear Channel radio to adopt their original stance and refuse advertising from the South Wind abortion clinic in Wichita, Kansas is available here

 

The site has a link to vote against the ads.

 

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ne...r-tiller-abortion-fa 

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Dove of Peace:

Vic, I'm afraid someone might make a case that this is off topic, though I can't for the life of me believe that anyone with any brains would not consider abortion a religious issue.

 

I signed the anti-abortion petition and encourage others to follow suit...

______________________________

 

I agree with you Dove. However, Best says that her opposition to abortion is not in any way related to religion. *shrug*

 

To her the issue has absolutely nothing to do with religion. Go figure...

 

I think you just called her brainless. 

 

 

I can see why to an Atheist would consider abortion strictly moral only and

against the laws of man. I also see a believer look at abortion as against the

laws of God and Man. It doesn't have to be a religious matter.

Man legalized this murderous act by way of a man made law in the name

of Human rights. With the exception of the murdered human.  

 

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:
I agree with you Dove. However, Best says that her opposition to abortion is not in any way related to religion. *shrug*

To her the issue has absolutely nothing to do with religion. Go figure...

I think you just called her brainless.  

______

Can I give my own opinion w/o it seeming as though I'm taking sides with anyone on this forum?

Go figure what, Jank? I can tell you for a fact that my thoughts on abortion has absolutely nothing to do with religion!! Just because someone would feel the need to call me brainless, does not make it so. I'm not brainless, in fact I'm far from it.

If I had never in my life heard of God/Jesus/Bible or any form of religion, my brain would still have the capacity to know right from wrong. If someone shot/killed a friend or a family member, is my brain not capable enough to know what that person did is wrong? It would have nothing to do with any kind of religion!

I resent the implication that a person has to be brainless or that they would have to be religious to know right from wrong. I'm far from religious, but my heart functions normally & my heart hurts for that baby that's murdered, no matter how it's murdered. I hope I never get so cold and/or heartless that I can't feel compassion & pain over a murdered baby/child.

Originally Posted by Dove of Peace:

Vic, I'm afraid someone might make a case that this is off topic, though I can't for the life of me believe that anyone with any brains would not consider abortion a religious issue.

I signed the anti-abortion petition and encourage others to follow suit...

______

Dove, I resent your implication that I have no brains. I am not a Christian, I am not religious, & I will go to Hell the day I die. (IFHell exist)

I know right from wrong & the way I see it, right from wrong has nothing to do with religion. You evidently believe that it does, but I would never say you have no brains for the way you believe.

Can you explain to me why you think a person would have to be a Christian and/or religious to know right from wrong?

Originally Posted by Dove of Peace:

Vic, I'm afraid someone might make a case that this is off topic, though I can't for the life of me believe that anyone with any brains would not consider abortion a religious issue.

I signed the anti-abortion petition and encourage others to follow suit...

 

----------------------------------

Could you explain why abortion is a religious issue? I don't base anything on religious reasons. Abortion on demand is, like one poster put it long ago, barbaric. It's a murderous, horrendous, sickening to normal people, practice, that every human being should be working to make obsolete. 

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by Jankinonya:
I agree with you Dove. However, Best says that her opposition to abortion is not in any way related to religion. *shrug*

To her the issue has absolutely nothing to do with religion. Go figure...

I think you just called her brainless.  

______

Can I give my own opinion w/o it seeming as though I'm taking sides with anyone on this forum?

Go figure what, Jank? I can tell you for a fact that my thoughts on abortion has absolutely nothing to do with religion!! Just because someone would feel the need to call me brainless, does not make it so. I'm not brainless, in fact I'm far from it.

If I had never in my life heard of God/Jesus/Bible or any form of religion, my brain would still have the capacity to know right from wrong. If someone shot/killed a friend or a family member, is my brain not capable enough to know what that person did is wrong? It would have nothing to do with any kind of religion!

I resent the implication that a person has to be brainless or that they would have to be religious to know right from wrong. I'm far from religious, but my heart functions normally & my heart hurts for that baby that's murdered, no matter how it's murdered. I hope I never get so cold and/or heartless that I can't feel compassion & pain over a murdered baby/child.

_____________________

 

Ok Semi, That's your opinion on abortion. Personally I have a different opinion. I have known women that have had abortions and I resent you or anyone else calling them murderers. I resent being told I am heartless, cold and without compassion because I support those womens rights to their own bodies. For most all women who have abortions it is a very hard decision to make. Not a decision made without heartache in many cases. Those that are so self righteous who judge them as cruel murderers, have not lived their lives, nor walked in their shoes. 

 

I have tried to have a discussion on this subject with you, Best and a few others here on the forums before, but usually when I ask you to see it from the other side I get no response.There are a million different reasons why a woman would chose abortion, yet you all want to only view it as a selfish, unfeeling act. 

 

The reason I think it is most definitely rooted in religion is because there is too much science that proves the embryo is not viable outside the womans womb for traditional abortions to be considered "murder". Yet those that oppose it seem to believe that this potential life holds equal if not more rights than the walking, talking, feeling, breathing woman that carries it. Why? If you don't believe it is because the embryo has a soul then how do you put so much more worth on a group of cells than the actual woman? 

 

I have put this scenarios to you a couple of times before and yet you have never given me an answer. I will try again.

 

If there was a building on fire and inside was a 6 month old baby and a container filled with embryos and you could only save one...which would you save and why?

 

Or how about a 10 year old is raped by her father and becomes pregnant, should she be forced to have his baby?

 

You have a daughter in critical condition who is 2 months pregnant. The Dr tells you that the only way she will live is if they abort the pregnancy. What do you do and why?

 

Of course these are not the only reasons women have abortions and I am not trying to say that, but they are relevant when discussing abortion. If you feel that the baby should be saved over the embryos then you have to admit that a living, breathing, fully functioning baby is different than a potential baby. If you think that no 10 year old should have to endure the long nine months of carrying a pregnancy that resulted in her father raping her, then you see the difference in that girls worth and the embryo she is carrying in her body. If you would chose your daughters life over that of a 8 week embryo then you see the difference once again. If you see no difference in these lives over the embryos then I would say that it is you that is heartless, cold and without compassion. Since I don't think you are any of those things I imagine you do see the difference. 

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by Dove of Peace:

Vic, I'm afraid someone might make a case that this is off topic, though I can't for the life of me believe that anyone with any brains would not consider abortion a religious issue.

I signed the anti-abortion petition and encourage others to follow suit...

______

Dove, I resent your implication that I have no brains. I am not a Christian, I am not religious, & I will go to Hell the day I die. (IFHell exist)

I know right from wrong & the way I see it, right from wrong has nothing to do with religion. You evidently believe that it does, but I would never say you have no brains for the way you believe.

Can you explain to me why you think a person would have to be a Christian and/or religious to know right from wrong?

-----------------------------

Semi, My very humble apology... I probably should have worded it differently... It was not aimed at anyone   In particular... The thing is, abortion and religion have become so intertwined that it is difficult to discuss abortion without being caught up in a discussion of religion... it is difficult to have a rational discussion on abortion because of this... Perhaps this thread does belong in another forum rather than religion. Myself, I try to consider abortion outside of religion and I am hesitant to get into discussion of the issue since it tends to infame emotions on both side. Again, my apologies to anyone offended...

On a lighter note, I'll bet you never thought you'd see anyone apologize in this forum... LOL...

 

Originally Posted by Dove of Peace:
Semi, My very humble apology... I probably should have worded it differently...
Myself, I try to consider abortion outside of religion and I am hesitant to get into discussion of the issue since it tends to infame emotions on both side. Again, my apologies to anyone offended...

On a lighter note, I'll bet you never thought you'd see anyone apologize in this forum... LOL...

_______

Thank you, Dove. I'll admit I was shocked to see your "anyone with any brains" comment because it didn't sound like you & I do appreciate your apology.

I also hesitate to get into a discussion of abortion since it does tend to inflame emotions & make people angry. I would never say someone was wrong for their opinion if different from mine & I would never accuse him/her as being brainless for that opinion.

As far as seeing anyone apologize in this forum, I'm not surprised to see it from you. It's not hard to tell who would have a heart for admitting a wrong, but most on this forum does not.

quote:   Originally Posted by Quaildog:

Abortion is killing.  Simply.  Accepted action? Yes but it is killing. It is killing even if it is involved in a 10 year old or whomever. It is your business to accept it if you wish but you are wrong to not allow others to not accept it.

Hi Quail,

 

You are right that abortion is killing -- the killing of an innocent baby.  I explain this in much greater detail in the new discussion titled "Abortions In America - Necessity, Or Convenience? "

 

Take a look.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,


Bill

Jank, I have answered your questions before, twice in fact. I have also responded before to your side of how you see it. You have every right to your opinion, & I would never dream of calling you names or treating you like you were stupid for believing the way you do.

I didn’t comment to your post to start a debate because I know how you feel. I commented to let you know that my thoughts, my opinion on abortion had absolutely nothing to do with religion, & I resented the implication that a person had to be brainless to be against abortion.

 

 

It’s not that I don’t want to answer your questions, I won’t because I’ve answered them before & I know it will once again lead to the same anger & hard feelings it did before. Some things just should not be discussed, & I should not have responded to your post. I won't apologize for my feelings/beliefs about abortion but if I offended you in any way, I do apologize for that.

Originally Posted by Quaildog:

Abortion is killing.  Simply.  Accepted action? Yes but it is killing. It is killing even if it is involved in a 10 year old or whomever. It is your business to accept it if you wish but you are wrong to not allow others to not accept it.

Well Puffquail, I almost missed the only thing you've gotten right. Good dog.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×