Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Frankly, I do not understand the naysayers. Anyone can see that climate is changing - icebergs are melting, most areas of the world has seen the hottest summers and warmest winters on record. At first I thought it could indeed be a cycle of weather extremes, but when you see things that are happening that are "firsts" in recorded records, it it time to get your head out of the sand and start acknowledging that it is an issue.

Originally Posted by BoldTruth:

Frankly, I do not understand the naysayers. Anyone can see that climate is changing - icebergs are melting, most areas of the world has seen the hottest summers and warmest winters on record. At first I thought it could indeed be a cycle of weather extremes, but when you see things that are happening that are "firsts" in recorded records, it it time to get your head out of the sand and start acknowledging that it is an issue.


Problem with your startement is "recorded history" is just a blink of the eye compared to the entire history.  Your looking at once piece of a billion piece puzzle and claiming to know what the big picture looks like.

Who are the stinking demoslops "saving" it for? Their future plans for the county-no jobs, no way for people to make a living, robbing the ones that are still productive and they are able to rob for as long as they can, catering only to a few select groups of people and squawking about climate change,(a red herring IMO) and something that really can't be controlled.

Originally Posted by BoldTruth:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Not just hiding data, changing it and attempting to deny the little age.

And what would the purpose of this be?

 

According to the National Weather Service, September was the second hottest in recorded history. Are they not a reputable source?

That's note worthy, serpent conniver, but no one was talking about water

on Mars either.....

 

Originally Posted by BoldTruth:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Not just hiding data, changing it and attempting to deny the little age.

And what would the purpose of this be?

 

According to the National Weather Service, September was the second hottest in recorded history. Are they not a reputable source?

__________________________________________________
Like any case of fraud, one follows the money. The global warming advocates are supported by governments and private institutions grants,  If there is no crisis, their funds shrink.  Most notably, the temperatures taken by satellite do not agree with ground bases stations.  Review of the ground based stations showed that temperatures in the cities (always much hotter than surrounding rural areas) were applied to the rural areas. 

 

 

Like any case of fraud, one follows the money. The global warming advocates are supported by governments and private institutions grants,  If there is no crisis, their funds shrink.  Most notably, the temperatures taken by satellite do not agree with ground bases stations.  Review of the ground based stations showed that temperatures in the cities (always much hotter than surrounding rural areas) were applied to the rural areas. 

 

Well, not sure if I agree. I can see evidence of things happening - droughts (such as the one in California), worldwide melting icecaps, decline of Arctic penguins, and the list goes on.

Originally Posted by BoldTruth:

 

Well, not sure if I agree. I can see evidence of things happening - droughts (such as the one in California), worldwide melting icecaps, decline of Arctic penguins, and the list goes on.

--------------------------------

There are no penguins in the Arctic.  Never have been.

 

http://www.athropolis.com/arct...ts/fact-penguins.htm

http://www.greenpeace.org/inte...e-arctic/blog/12900/

Freeman Dyson is concerning science one of the most intelligent men in the world -- politics, not so much.

 

"Theoretical physicist and Democrat voter Freeman Dyson has expressed his disappointment with President Obama’s stance on climate change.

 

“It's very sad that in this country, political opinion parted [people's views on climate change],” he said, in an interview with The Register. “I'm 100 percent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this issue, and the Republicans took the right side.”

 

Now retired, Dyson was a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton between 1953 and 1994. Famed for his work in quantum electrodynamics and nuclear engineering, Dyson also worked on climate studies during his career.

 

Climate change, according to Freeman, “is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts?"

 

The physicist and mathematician argues that pollution caused by fossil fuels has been conflated with climate change. “Coal is very unpleasant stuff, and there are problems with coal quite apart from climate,” he said. “Pollution is quite separate to the climate problem: one can be solved, and the other cannot, and the public doesn't understand that.”

 

During his interview with The Register Dyson noted shortcomings in climate models. “What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies between what's observed and what's predicted have become much stronger,” he said. “It's clear now the models are wrong, but it wasn't so clear 10 years ago. I can't say if they'll always be wrong, but the observations are improving and so the models are becoming more verifiable.”

 

Dyson also wrote a strong foreword to a report published Monday by The Global Warming Policy Foundation, which calls for a reassessment of carbon dioxide. “To any unprejudiced person reading this account, the facts should be obvious: that the non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial, that the possibly harmful climatic effects of carbon dioxide have been greatly exaggerated, and that the benefits clearly outweigh the possible damage,” he wrote."

http://www.foxnews.com/science...t-freeman-dyson.html

 

 

Scientists have replaced priests among some of the leftist elite.  Unfortunately, scientists, like priests, are human, suffering from the same good and evil.  Here is an example of my earlier statement concerning those who profit from the global warming.

 

"Scientist who urged government to sue climate skeptics gets millions from taxpayers"

 

http://www.foxnews.com/science...s-millions-from.html

 

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×